Click here to support the Daily Grail for as little as $US1 per month on Patreon
Hoax image shows 'Center for Global Human Population Reduction'

The Five Craziest Bill Gates Vaccine Conspiracy Theories

I’ve always been partial to a good, fun conspiracy theory. Trying to fit all the pieces together to find a hidden story, even if done with a hefty amount of speculative glue, is always an exciting pursuit.

The age of social media, however, is turning me into a grouchy old curmudgeon when it comes to conspiracy theories. They’re spreading like wildfire on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, even when they’re dumb as a box of hammers.

How bad is it? Consider this: I’m now writing a post defending Bill Gates.

Please understand: I’ve been ragging on the Microsoft co-founder since way back in the ’90s. This isn’t easy for me. But after seeing post after post on social media this week attacking Gates as some sort of demonic grim reaper, poised to remove billions of people from the planet with his poisonous vaccines, I felt compelled to speak up.

Because when conspiracy theories are *not* fun, is when they are (a) literally putting people’s lives at risk, and (b) purposefully deceitful.

And make no mistake: the impact of most of these conspiracy theories will be to have more people rejecting vaccines – an outcome which will cost many lives. Whether they’re started by alt-med grifters, true believers, or as influence operations, I can’t say – but in the end, the result will be the same.

So, here’s a sampling of the crazy Bill Gates conspiracy theories going around at the moment, along with why they’re bullshit – feel free to let your friends know the next time they share one on social media:

1. Bill Gates admitted that he was going to depopulate the planet by killing people with vaccines.

This one regularly makes the rounds, usually in the form of a short clip from a TED talk given by Gates, in which he says…

The world today has 6.8 billion people, that’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.

There it is! Boom, not even shy about it, Bill Gates says straight up, in public, that his vaccines are going to kill billions of people.

Except that’s not what he’s saying. The actual story: Bill Gates believes that by increasing the chance of childhood survival through vaccines, that parents will decide to have less children because they feel more secure that they won’t lose them to disease:

A surprising but critical fact we learned was that reducing the number of deaths actually reduces population growth… Contrary to the Malthusian view that population will grow to the limit of however many kids can be fed, in fact parents choose to have enough kids to give them a high chance that several will survive to support them as they grow old. As the number of kids who survived to adulthood goes up, parents can achieve this goal without having as many children.

Now, you can certainly argue whether Bill Gates is correct in this assumption, for sure. But he is not saying that vaccines are going to kill off people – actually, he’s saying the opposite. He’s trusting that they will help children survive disease in their youth, and that will help lower population in future by lowering birth rates.

2. The Center for Global Human Population Reduction

Tied in to the previous conspiracy meme, comes this one: an image that circulates regularly ‘showing’ that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation are behind a ‘Center for Global Human Population Reduction’.

The problem? There is no such center, and the image is photoshopped. But that hasn’t stopped it from being shared widely across social media, without anyone stopping to ask if it is real.

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation building

3. Bill Gates is going to make $200 billion from pushing vaccines on to people.

One of the funnier things I’ve seen going around is the claim that Bill Gates is making vaccines so he can be rich. Okay, sure, maybe he could be richer. But still…

Those pushing this line are quick to point out that Gates has said on a number of occasions that he has figured out there is a 20:1 return on investment for vaccinees – so the $10 billion he’s put into vaccines has earned $200 billion in profit.

The full video, however, tells a different story. What Gates is saying is that him donating $10 billion to global health programs results in an estimated $200 billion in social and economic benefits – as well as saving millions of lives.

As Gates notes in the part of the video that is edited out…

…Helping young children live, get the right nutrition, contribute to their countries – that has a payback that goes beyond any typical financial return.

4. Bill Gates is gleefully talking about injecting children with genetically modified organisms.

Yet another deceptively edited clip shows Bill Gates apparently talking gleefully about jamming a needle in kids’ arms and injecting genetically modified organisms (GMOs):

If, however, you watch the full video (Gates starts talking at 2:07), you’ll find something surprising: he’s actually advocating for careful testing before doing anything with GMOs. After his wife Melinda begins the talk advocating for the usage of GM crops in Africa, Bill Gates chimes in by saying…

The strongest analogy is to medicines…is there something to worry about with medicines, that is, might some of them have side effects? Do we need safety testing? I mean, we’re taking things that are genetically modified organisms, and we’re injecting them into little kids’ arms…we just shoot them right into the vein. So yeah, I think maybe we should have a safety system, where we do trials and test things out.

5. Bill Gates wants to put a microchip in the coronavirus vaccine and given to everybody in the world so that they can be tracked.

It’s the old ‘mark of the beast’ conspiracy theory, dressed up 2020 style!

Infowars microchip conspiracy

To be fair, there’s some background to this conspiracy theory that makes it reasonably plausible. The Gates’ Foundation has supported research into quantum dot technology for storing vaccination records as a micro-tattoo of sorts (not a microchip though, and not trackable remotely), and also into using microchips to ‘track’ medical samples taken from patients (not patients themselves though; not ‘trackable’ remotely; and not containing confidential information).

Conspiracy theorists have tied this rumour in with another Gates-backed project, ID2020, which seeks to create a global digital identification system.

However, it’s fair to ask why, in the age of ubiquitous smart phones, advanced facial recognition systems and biometric identification, Bill Gates would need to embed a microchip in everybody. And it might be interesting to find out how many of the people frightened by this conspiracy theory use Windows or Microsoft’s Office suite of products…

So, no Bill Gates is not using the coronavirus as an opportunity to build a global surveillance system. (That already exists, silly.)

We should certainly keep a close eye on billionaires and how they use their money and power to influence decision-making that affects us all. And we should be aware of how our privacy is constantly being eroded by the growth in surveillance systems.

However, we also need to understand that in the age of social media there is an army of grifters and political operatives seeking to use fear of vaccines, and mistrust in the likes of Bill Gates, as a tool to achieve their own objectives. And they don’t care whether their spreading of misinformation ends up killing thousands of people.

So it’s up to us. Before spreading that viral conspiracy theory – and likewise, before eating up any heart-warming stories about Saint Bill – we need to look at each story on its merits, check whether it is valid, and let truth guide us, rather than our political or cognitive biases.

  1. Over the years I have tried to get people to see many different things, and I would find it impossible to get them to even read books or watch video on the topics.

    – The more I would push them to see what I was saying, the more bizarre the pushback. HA!

    I found the book Factfulness that comes close to what I’m talking about.

    by Hans Rosling

    Rosling gave lecture after lecture and found that the more educated, the more informed, his audience was the less able they were to realize that they were wrong and learn what was right.

    This is a YouTube series discussing Factfulness.

    Hans Rosling on factfulness (2015)

    I do not see a solution to this problem. The more facts and information you present, the more people resist changing their mind.

    It is a clear example of the Zen concept of the need for The Beginner’s Mind. Most people are not willing to start from the beginning to actually learn something that contradicts everything that they already think that they know.

    From wiki:
    Shoshin is a word from Zen Buddhism meaning “beginner’s mind.” It refers to having an attitude of openness, eagerness, and lack of preconceptions when studying a subject, even when studying at an advanced level, just as a beginner would. The term is especially used in the study of Zen Buddhism and Japanese martial arts.

    The phrase is also discussed in the book Zen Mind, Beginner’s Mind by Shunryu Suzuki, a Zen teacher. Suzuki outlines the framework behind shoshin, noting “in the beginner’s mind there are many possibilities, in the expert’s mind there are few.”
    I’m sure you guys have come across this many times. Watch the YouTube series and maybe read the book just to realize that it happens all the time and not just with “Fringe” stuff. HA!

    BTW, notice the view count on the first video in the series – 7,571, Yet, the series has been on YouTube since 2015.

    1 – 7,571
    2 – 57,232
    3 – 18,258
    4 – 5,206
    5 – 1,456,334 <———-Wow
    6 – 6,569

    Notice, in the second video, at 11 minutes, he mentions how everybody got the answer wrong, not because they were stupid, but because it violated their preconceived ideas.

    Notice, in the fourth video he talks about the BS of "The Population Bomb" and how people are still trapped in that lie.

    Notice, in the fifth video the views jump because he goes into detail about the population growth.

    That is an example of what I mean. No one wants to actually understand something that disrupts their own personal viewpoint.

  2. Neither historians writing books nor those making YouTube documentaries can include everything for their chosen topic. They will choose some items and exclude others, creating a narrative that is aligned with their opinions or beliefs. (This will be more pronounced in a video documentary, owing to the nature of the medium.)

    James Corbett has strong opinions on a number of topics and these influence how he creates his documentaries. Even so, he endeavors to be fact-based and provides links to his sources.

    I always learn something from his documentaries although I don’t always agree with his conclusions or assessments — they may be based on facts but what’s missing that, added in, might create a different or fuller picture? Some are mere inference bordering on speculation; some place too much weight on the views of particular historians, leaving out contrary views by equally credible historians.

    Even so, I would recommend both his _How Big Oil Conquered the World_ and his multi-part series on Bill Gates. There are major differences between the Rockefellers and Gates and yet they have much common with some surprising links between them, while some of the Rockefeller activities were deliberately obscured by their public relations firms.

    Corbett’s videos can be found at

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mobile menu - fractal