Click here to support the Daily Grail for as little as $US1 per month on Patreon

News Briefs 29-10-2013

From today’s collection of news briefs, you may be able to deduce that Halloween is almost upon us…

Quote of the Day:

It would do the world a lot of good if we all made a habit out of trying really hard to not be unnecessarily upset at things.

Joe Rogan

Editor
  1. news
    Necropants: That’s just gross, they don’t even look tanned.

    Blob: Today’s forecast, slight chance of terror followed by showers from people wetting themselves. On a side note, stocks for Hanes are going way up 😛
    https://drupal.org/files/images/the_blob.jpg

    Brocken: One day, on my bucket list…

    Jung: I would like to go Trick-or-Treating with Jung, just for the conversations in between houses (I’m not that young anymore LOL but it would be fun)

  2. Science has lost its way
    I’m always immediately dubious about those who speak about “science” as if it was an entity and the author didn’t disappoint.

    What was amusing is that what he sees as being where research is going awry has long been the case. Science is a methodology implemented by people. It is not some perfect completely objective unbiased accessed to genuine knowledge.

  3. our brains may not yet have evolved sufficiently to unlock the s
    I don’t know about the “evolved” bit but it seems clear that the standard way humans operate mentally at present is still very backward.

  4. Science really has lost its way
    This Hiltzik article is a good one with truth in it.
    I am not so much concerned about the “cost to humanity”, but on the cost to science itself.

    1. Science is not an entity – it’s a set of methods
      [quote=nil]This Hiltzik article is a good one with truth in it.
      I am not so much concerned about the “cost to humanity”, but on the cost to science itself.[/quote]

      A method cannot “lose it’s way” nor can anything be a cost to it. Science is a loose accumulation of methods employed by humans. It isn’t an entity wandering around, checking a map, getting lost or found.

  5. In History of the Ouija, the
    In History of the Ouija, the article states:

    “What the team found surprised them: When participants were asked, verbally, to guess the answers to the best of their ability, they were right only around 50 percent of the time, a typical result for guessing. But when they answered using the board, believing that the answers were coming from someplace else, they answered correctly upwards of 65 percent of the time. “It was so dramatic how much better they did on these questions than if they answered to the best of their ability that we were like, ‘This is just weird, how could they be that much better?’” recalled Fels. “It was so dramatic we couldn’t believe it.” The implication was, Fels explained, that one’s non-conscious was a LOT SMARTER THAN ANYONE KNEW.”

    I find these statements shocking from professors of psychology, and other fields… Clearly the “professionals” who decide to run these studies have no familiarity with the alternative research of which they are undertaking. Anyone who has any knowledge of these fringe areas of the mind: dreams, esp, etc… well know the unconscious is far more intelligent than the conscious mind, as evidenced in dream studies. In dreams, our minds work out our problems – the ones we direct it to, and the ones we aren’t consciously aware we have. A well recalled and analyzed dream often will combine symbols, people, events, feelings, dialogue all in a complex tapestry to convey not just one message, but many messages simultaneously to our conscious mind, including information about health issues, problem solving, moral dilemmas, even precognitive information. It is common to “sleep” on a problem only to awaken with the answer. This holographic type of problem solving is rarely done by our conscious mind, which operates in a far more linear mode.

    Further the article says:

    “Ouija boards are not, scientists say, powered by spirits or even demons. Disappointing but also potentially useful—because they’re powered by us, even when we protest that we’re not doing it, we swear. Ouija boards work on a principle known to those studying the mind for more than 160 years: the ideometer effect…”

    Assuming the ideometer effect – small muscular movements – is the cause of the movement, whose to say spirits are not communicating through the human host who’s acting as a medium, compelling the movements… Or whose to say the person’s unconscious mind isn’t tuning into Jung’s universal unconscious, or receiving information through esp or remote viewing that is being relayed through the ideometer effect. I don’t think anyone believes spirits are moving the planchette or it would move on its own, not requiring human fingers touching it. Clearly it is directed by the human touch, but what is the source of the information conveyed through its movement – that is the question these scientist cannot definitively answer. Nor do I know the answer…

    And yet, I do know my unconscious mind is far smarter than my conscious mind, and moving my conscious mind out of the way to listen to my “gut,” to go with my intuition, to hear my unconscious prompting always results in far more favorable outcomes.

    Our conscious mind is cluttered with noise, usually chaotic, is often self-serving, rationalizes, justifies, sometimes petty, and is the source of most of the trouble we get into…at least that is my experience.

    Cayce’s hierarchy was conscious mind – most bound to earth, unconscious/subconscious mind – the go between, superconscious mind – our highest mind/our soul, with its direct connection to the universal mind/God. I agree with this analysis, however that may play into the Ouija…

    1. Nailed it
      [quote=Greg H.]Assuming the ideometer effect – small muscular movements – is the cause of the movement, whose to say spirits are not communicating through the human host who’s acting as a medium, compelling the movements… Or whose to say the person’s unconscious mind isn’t tuning into Jung’s universal unconscious, or receiving information through esp or remote viewing that is being relayed through the ideometer effect. I don’t think anyone believes spirits are moving the planchette or it would move on its own, not requiring human fingers touching it. Clearly it is directed by the human touch, but what is the source of the information conveyed through its movement – that is the question these scientist cannot definitively answer. Nor do I know the answer…[/quote]

      Spot on, and overall I found your entire comment a wonderful examination of that story. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!

  6. Ouija bored
    I wonder what kind of answers would they have got if they asked questions the participant definatelly would have not known the answer. Of course we can only speculate. But I love how they have interview Chris French for this one.
    What this proves is that well, our uncounsiousness move our body and that it’s intelligent, and these are not too suprizing results.
    I don’t deny ideomotor but this raises more questions in my mind than gives answers.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mobile menu - fractal