Click here to support the Daily Grail for as little as $US1 per month on Patreon
Communing with the Gods Book Cover

‘Going Native’ with Paranormal Experiences

In a recent article here on TDG, Jack Hunter described some of the paranormal experiences of anthropologist Edith Turner, when working among the Ndembu people of Zambia (see: “Anthropology of the Weird“). Today I was browsing through a book I helped publish last year, Communing with the Gods: Consciousness, Culture and the Dreaming Brain, by Charles D. Laughlin, Ph.D. (available from Amazon US and Amazon UK), and came across some quotes from Turner on what she sees as flaws in how anthropologists do their work:

Members of many different societies, even our own, tell us they have had experience of seeing or hearing spirits. Let us recall how anthropology has dealt with the question in the past. Mainline anthropologists have studiedly ignored the central matter of this kind of information – central in the people’s own view – and only used the material as if it were metaphor or symbol, not reality, commenting that such and such “metaphor” is congruent with the function, structure, or psychological mindset of the society… the neglect of the central material savors of our old bete noire, intellectual imperialism. What is pitiful is the tendency of anthropologists from among the Native peoples themselves to defer to the western view and accordingly draw back from claiming the truth of their own religion. The mission of western anthropologists to explain the system in positivist terms at all costs, which thereby influences a new elite, is oddly similar to the self-imposed task of the more hidebound religious missionaries who are also sworn to eliminate their hosts’ religion…

Laughlin discusses this problem in terms of the “don’t go native” rule in anthropology – which, in many ways, comes from a foundation of staying objective and thinking rationally, which is a state of mind very far removed from the beliefs and practices of many non-Western cultures. But, as Laughlin says (and Jack Hunter’s essay shows), “the simple fact is that these [transpersonal/paranormal] dream phenomena do seem to occur in the experience and data of ethnographers”.

The danger for the ‘scientific’ anthropologist? “One’s brain mediates one’s states of consciousness, and one is only able to reach a new state of consciousness when the circuitry of the brain has transformed into a new configuration. Once the new configuration is developed, there is no going back.” Scary stuff indeed for the committed rationalist…

You might also enjoy…

  1. “Once the new configuration
    “Once the new configuration is developed, there is no going back.”

    That is the essential fallacy. They have no faith in the “plasticity” of the human mind to experience various states without being overthrown. In their case that might be a legitimate fear. If the average anthropologist is narrow minded to begin with then they are likely to fear stepping out mentally. They know that their mind is dependent on rules for behavior and a code, so they fear a new code taking over; and they have so little faith in their mind’s ability to discern reality that they fear any challenges to their current consensus reality.

    1. Very good point too. The most
      Very good point too. The most academically conservative people I know are college professors. There is a groupthink and god help you if you depart from the accepted script. It can have real consequences professionally too. By far the people most terrified of discussing the 911 false flag are college professors. It makes them blanche and tremble. I live in a college town and have some professor friends. If word gets out that they are even vaguely having truck with those ideas the academic grapevine will quickly start hunmming with uncertain cosequences for their careers.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.