Click here to support the Daily Grail for as little as $US1 per month on Patreon

News Briefs 24-02-2009

I’m multitrack recording onto a phone. Me in 1995 would be incredulous.

Quote of the Day:

Some believe consciousness is entirely physical, others that there is some nonphysical component, some kind of soul. All seem sure. Not me. Trained in brain research, I lean toward the physical. Living as a sentient being, I lean away. Consciousness is a deep probe of the mystery of existence.

Robert Lawrence Kuhn

Editor
  1. Göbekli
    The Göbekli site is a reminder that all our early great invention were achieved by people we consider primitive and uneducated. But if you think about where all of it came from, there were really innovative minds at work.

    Not only did they come up with ways of doing things like building, writing, growing food, sailing, and so on. They came up with the idea that these things were useful.

    I think a lot of the explanations are wrong that say, for example in the Newsweek article:

    [quote]
    The need to build and maintain this temple, he says, drove the builders to seek stable food sources, like grains and animals that could be domesticated, and then to settle down to guard their new way of life.
    [/quote]

    There was no need to do any of those things, building temples, growing food or herding animals. Someone decided life would be better if they did those things.

    There is never any need to improve life. People typically just suffer at the currently accepted rate. Many religions glorify this. Never ask for more, they say.

    1. very good point
      and I don’t think it was all about survival. What of fun, pleasure and creativity. Expressing their imaginations. Life could have been easier then we realise and time for just having a good time may have been plentiful. This complex could have spawned out of that.
      Look at our technology that is a direct result of entertainment.
      Just a thought from another angle.

      1. cermony and celebration
        I was just thinking about something related the other day.

        We have all these ceremonial sites, and get-togethers for religious purposes.

        At the same time, humans love to celebrate. Weddings, harvest, successful hunt, you name it.

        We then have our eminent social scientists and historians explaining that the reason for the ceremonies and ceremonial sites is the religion.

        To a large extent that is probably not correct. Mostly people just want an excuse to celebrate, pretty much anything will do.

        So the reason for celebrations, ceremonies and monumental architecture is not the religion, which then forces innovation and hard work. It is more the other way around – celebrations, and their formality, get bigger because people can afford it.

        How about this: early art did not start as an expression of deep emotional convictions. It started because it was a cool thing to do. Hey we can make pictures of horses being hunted!

        Similarly with much of what we call engineering today. People make things, create things, because it is fun. It is much less important that the created thing is useful or fun. The making is fun.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.