Click here to support the Daily Grail for as little as $US1 per month on Patreon

Depth Perception

I found this YouTube video of the late Carl Sagan explaining the ‘4th Dimension’ interesting:

Now apart from Sagan’s bald plagiarism in knocking off Hugo Weaving’s ‘Agent Smith’ from the Matrix movies (crumbly, but…good), he’s also of course taking much of the narrative here from Edwin Abbott’s classic 1884 novel Flatland. In its time, the book was on the cutting edge – not just for it’s coverage of thinking in a higher dimension, but also for its analogies to social heirarchies and deviantism. Of course, the idea itself can be found in various forms* throughout history, such as in Plato’s allegory of the cave (*pun not intended).

What I find ironic about this video though is that we have Sagan – a high-profile skeptic, who sits in the pantheon of ‘skeptical deities’ – discussing how anomalous (even mystical) phenomena can occur through some agency beyond our understanding, leaving the experiencer somewhat isolated due to the ineffability of the experience. Without Sagan batting an eyelid.

As Michio Kaku says, in his book Parallel Worlds:

…in a four-dimensional world, we are the Flatlanders, oblivious of the fact that higher planes of existence might hover right above ours. We believe that our world consists of all we can see, unaware that there may be entire universes right above our noses. Although another universe might be hovering just inches above us, floating in the fourth dimension, it would appear to be invisible.

Because a hyperbeing would possess superhuman powers usually ascribed to a ghost or spirit, in another science fiction story, H.G. Wells pondered the question of whether supernatural beings might inhabit higher dimensions. He raised a key question that is today the subject of great speculation and research: could there be new laws of physics in these higher dimensions. In his 1895 novel ‘The Wonderful Visit’, a vicar’s gun accidentally hits an angel, who happens to be passing through our dimension…The vicar questions the wounded angel. He is shocked to find that our laws of nature no longer apply in the angel’s world. In his universe, for example, there are no planes, but rather cylinders, so space itself is curved.

Flatland, in my opinion, offers a very good reason why investigation of anomalies is a valid exercise. Certainly, it demands the use of rigorous and honest scientific research; but also it requires an open mind and the willingness to speculate wildly at times.

——-

Interesting sidenote: While researching this story I had a run of fun coincidences/synchronicities which readers might enjoy. I had just finished reading an article on filmmaker David Cronenberg and his movie VideoDrome, and walked into my study to begin work on this story about multiple dimensions. As I walked into the room, my gaze landed on two books on one of my bookshelves – Michio Kaku’s Hyperspace and Parallel Worlds. I sat down to see at the top of the list in Nambu (my Twitter client) an entry from Mac Tonnies: “Touch interface technology and David Cronenberg’s “Videodrome”: http://tinyurl.com/lf8x58″. After enjoying that little moment, I then went to Wikipedia to look up ‘Hypercubes’, and was pleased to find this animation of a rotating hypercube – I’d seen something similar a few years back on the web, but could never find it again. Once I finished reading, I then clicked on Mac’s link, which took me to his Posthuman Blues blog. Go on, click it, and look to the right of the page…

Editor
  1. UFO:

    Unidentified
    Fourth-dimensional
    Object

    PS: Agents sporting “turtle necks” wouldn’t look too menacing 😉
    —–
    It’s not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me…
    It’s all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!

    Red Pill Junkie

  2. Sagan/Matrix
    HIlarious–about Sagan and Agent Smith. Never saw that before. ( BTW–Sagan had been dead for three years before “The Matrix” was even released, so not much chance of plagiarism there–unless there was some time travel involved.)

    1. Baldly going…
      [quote=jupiter.enteract]( BTW–Sagan had been dead for three years before “The Matrix” was even released, so not much chance of plagiarism there–unless there was some time travel involved.)[/quote]

      Greg was being tongue-in-cheek, although you can never be sure with this 4-D business. But this however:

      [quote=Greg]apart from Sagan’s bald plagiarism in knocking off Hugo Weaving’s ‘Agent Smith’ from the Matrix movies…[/quote]

      “Bald”? Bit harsh Greg, Sagan had a very nice head of hair in this video. :p

      Quantum physics leaves my head in a spin, but if it’s good enough for the likes of Michio Kaku to speculate, then I see no reason why we can’t consider the possibility that the inhabitants of higher dimensions can see us — and it’s only when they enter our level of perception that we can see them. Some religious texts and philosophies are suggestive of this, although I think as more of an ethical motivator (act as if you’re always being watched, is a Buddhist teaching).

      ~ * ~

      @levitatingcat

  3. Email I sent to friends related to this article…
    Thanks Greg for researching and posting this article! I guess it was just the right time for me to be reading this because it really fired my imagination.

    I used some of the links from the article, added a couple myself, and sent the following email to my spiritual friends (fellow adventurers):

    Hi All,

    I don’t take those intelligence tests that are constantly being advertised in the media. Who knows if they are solvable, or actually measure whatever they purport to measure?

    But here is an intellectual challenge that I have decided to attempt to get my mind around. I offer it to you because you might see the value in attempting to understand this challenge….

    Most people understand the 3-dimensional world we live in. We have to understand the basics of three dimensional reality in order to throw a baseball, drive a car, or even walk around our own home. But science has started to describe the existence of additional dimensions in data storage, quantum physics, and other intellectual/physical fields of endeavor. Some spiritual authors/speakers say that beings live on alternate dimensions and are sometimes able to communicate/interface with people living in the 3-dimensional world. We could be talking about angels, spiritual “masters’ (think Jesus), even GOD.

    Well, what would that sort of communication consciously be like? How would we recognize a communication coming from another dimension? Would we even recognize that?

    In the movie “What the Bleep” (http://www.whatthebleep.com/whatthebleep/)there is an animated story of “Flat-landers” living in a 2-dimensional world who come into contact with 3-dimensional beings for the first time. It is an excellent example of the panic that might result in these 2-dimensional character’s lives if a 3-dimensional conscious being suddenly “pushed” themselves into a 2- dimensional world. It would take too long to describe, in text, what the 2-D beings experience, but it is available in the movie “What the bleep” if you want to rent it and watch the short animated feature. This animated short is also available here on Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWyTxCsIXE4

    So what if we were living in a 3-dimensional world, and a 4-dimensional or higher level being tried to interface with us? What would that kind of communication be like? Perhaps by understanding how higher dimensional objects can be visualized by mathematicians/scientists, you can prepare your mind to receive communication from Angels? Or spiritual masters. Then again, it might be too scary to imagine, like the little girl “circle” at 2:42 in the video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWyTxCsIXE4).

    Anyway, the following Wikipedia articles discuss higher dimensional objects, and I wanted to make them available to you, along with an explanation of why you might be interested in trying to understand them.

    The three articles I found are:

    Hypercube (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypercubes#n-cube_rotation)

    n-sphere (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypersphere)

    Simplex (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simplex)

    1-solo-adventurer

  4. Masters?
    When we stars dscussing the possibility of beings living in higher dimensions, we immediately assume that they are more advanced than us, either technologically, in intelligence, or spiritually.

    One of the things I loved the most about the movie “The Mothman Prophecies” was the explanation that Dr. Leek (based losely on John Keel) gives to John Klein —also based on Keel— who’s played by Richard Geer, when Leek points out a skyscraper and says that a person standing on the top floor of that building has a better vantage points to observe events that are out of the scope of the ones standing on the ground; you could even say that such a person would be able to know of events before the ones standing on the ground (say, a fire or a car accident).

    Now the thing is this: in the movie Leek argues that the person in the building may not be more intelligent or more well-intentioned than the rest; he just happens to be standing in a higher level.

    That’s something we should all think about.

    —–
    It’s not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me…
    It’s all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!

    Red Pill Junkie

    1. Sauce for the goose
      [quote=red pill junkie]Leek points out a skyscraper and says that a person standing on the top floor of that building has a better vantage points to observe events that are out of the scope of the ones standing on the ground; you could even say that such a person would be able to know of events before the ones standing on the ground (say, a fire or a car accident).

      Now the thing is this: in the movie Leek argues that the person in the building may not be more intelligent or more well-intentioned than the rest; he just happens to be standing in a higher level.
      [/quote]

      Really excellent snack food!

      I heard the same basic allegory, back in the late 1970s, but using a slightly different vehicle…

      A person, any average person who may be at the wheel of an automobile at the time of a breakdown, has far more knowledge of the immediate situation than does a trained mechanic a mile away.

      The universe is built to service its inhabitants, or users, if you will. We don’t have to have a working understanding of the deep mechanics because it was designed and/or constructed to be user friendly. But once (or if) we do someday master the nuts and bolts of the system, all things become possible and nothing at all will be impossible. Magic becomes mechanics and supernatural becomes a simple matter of adjustment.

    2. Don’t Bow Too Quickly
      It seems to be a natural response in humans. When confronted with a novel phenomenon, subordination through fear or worship is repeatedly seen in population after population.

      Take Cortes. A little white skin, some steel, and a couple of horses, and people take you for a god. Of course, it wears off, but look at the results. Consider cargo cults in the Pacific or the worship of nature spirits in some cultures. Even the elevation of Western cultural elements in some societies has a degree of subordination to it.

      My concern is that I see this assumption by some in UFO circles. If we are contacted by aliens, I expect a number of people to automatically start venerating and even collaborating with them. If the aliens have sinister motives, humanity will be at war with itself as well.

  5. The Cube
    There is another series of movies that might interest you, The Cube and it’s two sequels. From idmb:

    Six different people, each from a very different walk of life, awaken to find themselves inside a giant cube with thousands of possible rooms. Each has a skill that becomes clear when they must band together to get out: a cop, a math whiz, a building designer, a doctor, an escape master, and a disabled man. Each plays a part in their thrilling quest to find answers as to why they’ve been imprisoned.

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0123755/

    1. Puzzle it Out and then Right for the Future
      When I saw the first movie, I was “Hey, this is a Dungeons and Dragons adventure.”

      (I could almost hear the dice rolling when a new room was opened)

      I so like seeing movies like this so I can recognize the Canadian actors…

  6. Full of Melancholy Elephants
    Greg,

    Get ready for what is happening now, what with the creation of a ‘perfect memory’ for humanity (computers, the ‘net, and such storage devices) and what that is going to do to IP :3

    I wonder if the ‘intentional forgetting’ that was built into the old IP rights will be able to survive…or if it will be something entirely different?

    And Sagan had a doppelganger, like all celebrities did, one that wasn’t the person it described…

    I think that scientists are beholden to try to use what terms and concepts they already have to try to describe what they are observing. That can cover a lot. It is almost an addiction, I think, to try to come up with fruits that “aren’t really there.”

    Then I think of the creators of Quantum Mechanics, and, even though someone might not truly grok what it means, the equations still work and produce results. And I think of the language that they have had to create, just to be able to try to understand what it is they are observing.

    (it is almost as if they are Shamans. almost)

    I laugh when I think when they have to try to explain it to us ‘uninitiated’ — to try to translate the precise concepts of QM to mere French/English/Hindustandi/etc :3

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mobile menu - fractal