Click here to support the Daily Grail for as little as $US1 per month on Patreon

The Truthiness About Medium

Last week, the Phoenix New Times posted an extremely in-depth story about medium Allison Dubois, who has gained fame over the past few years due to the TV series based around her life, Medium. The article takes a skeptical eye to the Dubois’ claims about working with law enforcement, as well as some more personal stories, talking not just to the lady in question, but her family and friends as well.

As Michael Prescott has pointed out on his blog, there is a decidely negative tone to the story. Michael cites the example of the death of Dubois’ childhood friend – much space is devoted to a contrary account to the story told by Dubois, but hardly any to supportive material.

However, medium Marcel Cairo has taken issue with Dubois’ alleged ‘creativity’ in recounting her past history assisting law enforcement agencies, in his recent blog post “Dubious About Dubois“:

As a medium devoted to the promotion of psi research and the demotion of charlatans, I would hope that Ms. Dubois would genuinely tackle the very valid criticisms made against her rather than attack those who make them. The more ammunition we give the skeptics to ridicule and debase the search for outer consciousness, the more banging of our heads against the wall we’ll experience.

Personally, I can’t help but see a little hypocrisy in Allison Dubois falling out with Dr Gary Schwartz because it “angers her that someone would try to profit from her abilities”, when she herself writes books which mention people’s dead children whom she has assisted in locating (such as the Dave Hartman mentioned in the article) – those parents may have a greater claim to being offended, in my opinion (regardless of her ability). Similarly, her alleged private email threats to the writer of the story mention putting things on the public record.

However, whatever character flaws Dubois might have (or not have, as the case may be – I’m hardly trusting of the press), shouldn’t be considered in assessing her possible psychic abilities. Certainly, as Marcel Cairo says, such controversies provide ammunition for fundamentalist skeptics – and so it’s worthwhile calling for some explanation of the story’s criticisms. But, Dr Gary Schwartz, despite no longer being on speaking terms with Dubois, maintains that she is an immensely talented medium. If that is the case, we can only hope that Allison Dubois at some point undergoes further scientific testing to assess her abilities.

Editor
  1. Criteria…
    I think the problem is that a lot of people expect that mediums are “better humans” than the rest of us, nicer, less money-hungry and more publicity-shy. Such “requirements”, however, are purely in the eye of the beholder. We have come to accept that politicians sleep with any woman they fancy, that sport stars can be dim, and singers drug addicts. But it doesn’t mean singers cannot sing. With mediums, however, the consensus seems to be that they need to be “more”, “better”. This is as much “our” fault, as the media’s, who in this case merely acts as a mirror, and uses this as a perfect excuse to go for the debunking.

    By raising the bar for the supernatural, we’ll never get evidence for it. In short, Greg, I agree with you 😉

    1. Agreed
      The worst type of skeptic debunks the person, rather than their theories or abilities. Unfortunately, it’s the norm amongst skepticism.

      I also think our disappointment in the personalities and personal lives of mediums stems from the fact that we believe and hope the development of psychic abilities means we are evolving from materialistic, warmongering, petty, selfish creatures of pop culture into higher beings of peace, love and enlightenment. What happens if, in 2012, we all achieve an evolutionary jump, but lack the moral grounding? It’s why I strongly believe Eastern mysticism, especially Buddhism, and its moral depths is vital to the path of enlightenment and self-development. Are we in the West developing psychic abilities without the moral grounding those in the East are raised in? The Tao, Buddhism, Sufism, Gnosticism, all have a strong moral grounding. Many experiments at the Monroe Institute strongly suggest good, sincere intentions and attitudes are vital to achieving solid results.

      1. What abilities?
        Funny that there has not been one psychic who submitted themselves to any OBJECTIVE scientific tests which confirms their “gift”. This does not just mean Randi’s 1m challenge it means any neutral and objective tests designed in a way to eliminate any partiality of the tester.

        Of course the argument is that these “gifts” are affected by numerous negative agents (and other well rehearsed excuses) which prevent any confirmation. That so then how can there be any creditability given to anything the so “gifted” person says from the “beyond” as this could have been easily affected by any of the aforementioned negative agents and other excuses?

        Keep in mind that when any of these so called gifted psychics are wrong they are quick to use their “get out of jail free” card with excuses of negative agents and other factors affecting their “ability”.

        There seems to be no shortage of “gifted psychics” – pick up any woman’s tabloid – many to choose from and 100% accurate “guaranteed” too! Wow!

        On to the “mystical” year of 2012…

        “What happens if, in 2012, we all achieve an evolutionary jump…”

        What makes the Mayans so special that they are the holders of anything so prophetic as the “end of the world” and other things like you mentioned – a software upgrade, or a service patch from the beyond?

        The Mayan “long count” calendar is very complex and due to its structure there are cycles which the counting is reset. A little research into would show this – here is a good start.

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maya_calendar

        Why then is there any significance to one such reset in counting due in 2012? Well for one it sounds good, makes good reading…and there are no shortage of people who will subscribe to it. Especially if by coincidence there is some event that coincides with 2012 like a asteroid near miss (or near hit) which fans the fire! LOL!

        I do agree with one point that if everyone satisfied their need of a “religion” or “spiritual belief” with something benign as Buddhism instead of the more “kill the heretics” beliefs and religions the world would be a better place.

        Keep in mind that good morals and a sense of right and wrong does not need a spiritual belief or religion to develop.

        However ff people like or need to believe in these things and are happy to do so well who am I do take that away – go for it.

        Cheers

        1. Really?
          [quote=tihz_ho]Funny that there has not been one psychic who submitted themselves to any OBJECTIVE scientific tests which confirms their “gift”. This does not just mean Randi’s 1m challenge it means any neutral and objective tests designed in a way to eliminate any partiality of the tester. [/quote]

          I think the problem there may be more to do with your definition of “OBJECTIVE scientific tests”. Have there been any such tests designed and offered that you agree with? I’m assuming that your use of the ‘objective’ qualification means you don’t accept Leonora Piper undergoing more than 20 years of testing by the SPR, who all agreed – even the uber-skeptical Frank Podmore – that she gained information supernormally.

          To be fair to Piper, she also willingly underwent tests by skeptics Hall and Tanner, including undergoing physical discomfort during those tests (pressure tests on the hand, and blistering to her lips from camphor put in the mouth, in order to test her trance). Though Hall and Tanner came away with a negative result, their tests were hardly objective (not to mention their conclusions are rather confused…they can’t seem to believe even that Piper was genuinely in a trance, despite their tests suggesting that was the case) – so that still doesn’t fit your criteria.

          Whether mediums have those abilities or not is debatable. But I think you have it wrong in saying that *all* mediums studiously avoid being tested. In fact, I know of one medium who comments here on TDG, that is very keen to undergo objective scientific testing.

          Kind regards,
          Greg
          ——————————————-
          You monkeys only think you’re running things

          1. Hmm that was a hundred years ago but…
            Leonora Simonds Piper was born in June 1859.

            Scientific study at that time was at most primitive. I recall an Physicians Medical book from 1880 which stated that while the function of blood is unknown it is known that if one loses enough of it death may occur.

            Therefore any scientific testing in the 1800’s is not what I would call conclusive as Cottingley fairies hoax comes to mind…so if Piper is the only medium to date who could be certified “genuine” well then I rest my case…

            Why hasn’t the one medium of who you speak been tested in one form or another?

            Cheers

          2. Primitive?
            [quote=tihz_ho]Scientific study at that time was at most primitive. I recall an Physicians Medical book from 1880 which stated that while the function of blood is unknown it is known that if one loses enough of it death may occur.

            Therefore any scientific testing in the 1800’s is not what I would call conclusive as Cottingley fairies hoax comes to mind…so if Piper is the only medium to date who could be certified “genuine” well then I rest my case…[/quote]

            Hiya,

            While I appreciate your skepticism, until you read the actual documentation I fear you’re talking from a less than knowledgable position in this case. There are around 1000 pages in the Proceedings of the S.P.R. regarding the testing of Leonora Piper, which are worth acquainting yourself with if you want to be taken seriously in debating the Piper case – not to mention calling into question the scientific thoroughness of the investigators. I’m hoping to OCR a bunch of them at some stage and put them up on TDG, though the full complement is going to be rather time intensive.

            Piper is not the only one, I only used her as an example. Gladys Leonard was held in almost the same esteem, just she doesn’t have the same documentation regarding her testing.

            Additionally, your mention of the state of science in the 1800s as being “primitive” is wide of the mark. Anytime in the past can be condemned for ‘ignorance’ of established facts (just as we will be in the future). However, there was also some remarkable science done in the 1800s – ironically, some of it done by the members of the SPR such as Sir Oliver Lodge and Sir William Crookes.

            My point though wasn’t in saying that these mediums were genuine (although the Piper case is pretty damn amazing when you read the details) – it was regarding your assumption that mediums avoid testing. Mrs Piper submitted to it for 26 years or so.

            [quote]Why hasn’t the one medium of who you speak been tested in one form or another? [/quote]

            I can’t speak for him, perhaps he might see this and say something. I know he has approached some people though, whether anything has come of it I’m not sure.

            Kind regards,
            Greg
            ——————————————-
            You monkeys only think you’re running things

          3. Apples and Oranges
            I do appreciate you taking the time in your replies as I know how busy you are. 🙂

            I imagine the Piper tests would be an interesting read – however if this study revealed something substantial why then is this study still fringe and unaccepted by main stream science after 100 or so years?

            Seems odd…

            But then again during this time dinosaur bones were also thought to be “proof” of giant humans who once walked the earth or daemons and Noah’s flood – Mars was of course inhabited (so was the moon) and the proof was there in the canals and so on.

            Therefor I do stand by my statement regarding scientific study then and now. I am quite familiar with Sir William Crookes – he also was a supporter of spiritualism and studied mediums. I can understand why you referenced him…

            I am sceptical of things that later prove to be not what was first thought to be. I am also not close minded however the jury is still out on this one.

            Perhaps the problem is there are too many nuts in the muesli. People will believe what they damn well want to believe whether it is in mediums or pseudo-science with lots of “quantum” double talk.

            Cheers

            PS – A 1000 pages is a lot! If you have only hard copies scanning anything more than a few pages is a slow an arduous task. This is where Adobe Acrobat excels – scanning directly to a PDF and an eager intern! 🙂

          4. A Fascinating subject
            [quote=tihz_ho]I imagine the Piper tests would be an interesting read – however if this study revealed something substantial why then is this study still fringe and unaccepted by main stream science after 100 or so years? [/quote]

            Maybe you should be asking mainstream science…?
            😉

            One important fact to come out of the Piper case – regardless of anyone’s final conclusion of the evidence – is that the modern skeptical movement will lie and deceive as heartily as those they claim are defrauding. Martin Gardner’s skeptical piece on Mrs Piper – often cited by skeptics who haven’t read the files as a ‘demolition’ – is a catalogue of mis-statement, innuendo and, dare I say it, deception. Goes to show that skepticism should be applied evenly to *all* claims.

            [quote]But then again during this time dinosaur bones were also thought to be “proof” of giant humans who once walked the earth or daemons and Noah’s flood [/quote]

            I do believe there is the same belief these days in some quarters! 😉

            [quote]I am quite familiar with Sir William Crookes – he also was a supporter of spiritualism and studied mediums. I can understand why you referenced him…[/quote]

            I think you didn’t read my sentence properly. I deliberately referred to him as being both a top-notch scientist *and* a member of the SPR (Society for Psychical Research), to show that the two were compatible.

            [quote]I am also not close minded however the jury is still out on this one. [/quote]

            Absolutely agreed. As I said, my original comment was about your opinion that mediums did not submit to scientific testing. I think Mrs Piper deserves more credit for the scrutiny (some might say intrusion) she allowed investigators.

            Kind regards,
            Greg
            ——————————————-
            You monkeys only think you’re running things

        2. 2012 reference point
          [quote=tihz_ho]
          On to the “mystical” year of 2012…

          “What happens if, in 2012, we all achieve an evolutionary jump…”

          [/quote]

          I used 2012 simply as a reference point, an example of a singularity event or jump in evolution. I am not saying this will happen in 2012.

          There have been plenty of scientific papers written in recent years that suggest we evolved in infrequent, massive jumps, rather than slow, steady natural selection. So, my original point remains very valid in context of the topic.

      2. capabilities and morals
        You (Rick MG) make a good point :

        “…we believe and hope the development of psychic abilities means we are evolving from materialistic, warmongering, petty, selfish creatures of pop culture into higher beings of peace, love and enlightenment”

        That indeed seems to be a common belief. It would be nice if that happened.

        But what makes us think that a person with more capabilities would act in a more moral way?

        People who can run faster don’t act nicer. Same with people who have a better understanding of human nature, or of rocket science, or of gardening.

        It seems more likely that actual psychics, who are able to understand or even change other people’s minds, would take advantage of this ability. They would (or are) just as selfish and greedy as the rest of us.

        As an entirely separate point, I don’t see how Eastern cultures have made people there any nicer. In spite of the moral grounding of their philosophies and religions, they are just as selfish and brutal as everyone else.

        —-
        The large print giveth,
        The small print taketh away.

        1. East meets West
          [quote=earthling]
          As an entirely separate point, I don’t see how Eastern cultures have made people there any nicer.[/quote]

          I’m referring to Buddhist monks, Ghandi, etc., those who practice what they preach. Eastern traditions, in my view, adhere more to personal responsibility, rather than blaming an outside force or authority. It’s why Bhutan and so many buddhist nations tend to be more peaceful, as opposed to Maoist China, Catholic Spain, or capitalist America. Although in the West you have those who adhere to what Jesus Christ taught, not what the Church commands. But most people, from what I’ve observed, think those who pursue such moral paths (in the true sense of morality, really basic stuff — do no wrong to others, be truthful, etc) are weak, weird, or losers.

          So yeah, if we do experience a massive evolutionary jump in the near future and develop psychic abilities… well, I don’t hold out much hope for people being responsible.

          1. societies or monks
            I’m not as optimistic. Certainly there are a few thousand monks who practice what they preach.

            But India, in spite of Ghandi, is not a particularly peaceful place. There is crime and war and terrorism, at least as bad as in the West.

            People used to say nice things about Nepal, as if it were a paradise of sorts. Again, terrorism and war are there, they are just now trying to get over that.

            Bhutan? I don’t know much about the place, other than where it is on a map. So I can’t judge how people live there. But I have heard the story before with other isolated places – things are supposed to be just great there, and nobody can really tell. I suspect it is wishful thinking this time too.

            —-
            The large print giveth,
            The small print taketh away.

          2. Bhutan
            Bhutan isn’t Shangri La, it’s very real and very amazing. I’d love to visit there one day — Tiger’s Nest Monastery is my desktop wallpaper. It’s true that, being a very small country, they can choose the direction they want to go in. Half a million people, all of whom are Buddhist, makes it a lot easier, but no less challenging with Western (and capitalist Asian) influences looking for gaps in their defences.

            I’m not saying Bhutan is a shining magical world of peace and love, I’m sure there are selfish people around — but the overwhelming majority of Bhutanese have a rich grounding in spirituality/morality. If a consciousness shift happens, they’ll be in a much better position to deal with it responsibly and with sincerity than, say, the people of Oslo Norway. Nothing against Norwegians mind you, I just picked Oslo because it has parity with population to Bhutan. 😉

          3. remote places
            Yes I know that Bhutan is a real place. I hope you get to visit sometime. Don’t disturb them too much if you go.

            It is just that I heard things like this before. Two examples: Iceland and Albania.

            Iceland – not long ago there was some newspaper or magazine that wrote the happiest society on Earth was Iceland. I haven’t been there in many years, and back then I only was on an airport. Icelandair had the cheapest flights from Europe to North America. The natives at the airport at Keflavik were just as grumpy as any airport. Not a fair sample, I have to admit – the grumpiness of the travelers rubs off.

            Albania – back in the 1970s, there was a guy in my school who was a really idealistic communist, let’s call him AL. Mao was too reactionist for him. The shining example of good communist practice was Albania – nobody could go there, so it was difficult to contradict AL. When Albania finally opened up, we saw that people there were far from happy.

            I hope that Bhutan is different.

            —-
            The large print giveth,
            The small print taketh away.

  2. Medium Testing
    I believe the medium Greg is referring to is me.

    I’ve been doing plenty of thinking about why mediumship testing has gotten nowhere in the last century and a half.

    My conclusion is that mediumship is simply a tool of spiritual psychology and not a source of verifying fact. Though this doesn’t mean that mediumship can’t every now and then uncover a fact in the process of conducting spiritual analysis.

    What I am saying is that mediumship has been misrepresented.

    If mediumship were a hammer, mediums would claim that their hammer was designed to hit nails and not people, but they could never prove it, since many hammers themselves have hit thousands of thumbs, and additionally, many angry people have used hammers to hit other humans.

    So when skeptics attack medium experiments for their results being subjective, the experimenter for being biased and the mediums for being cold readers, you can’t prove this wrong because like that hammer that keeps hitting that thumb, what skeptics are saying is often true – even though this is a consequence of poor usage than of poor design.

    What I am getting at is that I am trying to figure out how you put a hammer under scientific scrutiny to prove that it was designed for one purpose, even though there exists evidence to the contrary.

    Therefore, I think medium testing should move away from the survival hypothesis, and refocus itself to testing the non-local consciousness hypothesis (i.e. Telepathy, PK, etc.)

    I am designing some new experiments that will hopefully combine some of what has been done with Ganzfeld testing and what has been done with medium testing.

    We first have to prove that consciousness is not limited by the walls of the skull before we try to extrapolate that consciousness continues on beyond the death of the brain.

  3. I have experience with
    I have experience with projecting electromagnetic fields. I’m just curious what your practice entails. Do you sit in full-lotus? If so, how much? What did you do for your training? http://springforestqigong.com relies on energy transmissions from Master Chunyi Lin and he teaches the small universe practice plus some simple standing tai-chi moves and also self-concentration meditation. He teaches how to open up other people’s small universe channels — the main front and back channel — using the hands and then to use thunder palms and sword fingers to put in and break up energy, respectively. In Level III he touches your forehead to help open up the pineal gland and now I have a permanent magnetic bliss in my pineal gland. I sit in full-lotus as much as possible but my diet is terrible. My main practice is somewhat strange. Electromagnetic fields from my pineal gland shoot into females around me, causing us to have a mutual climax, as I take in their electrochemical energy and then transfer it back into electromagnetic fields. Last summer I went 3 days without food just by relying on those mutual psychic climaxes while I sat in full-lotus. I call them “O at a Ds.” It started when I kept getting hit on so much by females so I started sitting in full-lotus in public as a preventative measure from getting my chi converting back into fluid. Then I noticed that I caused this young female who came near me to have a climax and it was mutual.

    I haven’t taken classes from Chunyi Lin since 2005 or so but he also trained Jim Nance to be a qigong master. They both send energy at a distance and have made the middle of my head burn from this energy at a distance. I did an 8 day bigu fast or energy feast just on half a glass of water and then the full-lotus practice caused the room to spin around me. At a weekend retreat I saw dead spirits, yellow orbs, coming to hear Master Chunyi Lin speak as he emitted chi. He confirmed this. Also I healed my mom of a serious illness. That was back in 2000 but the energy was too strong for normal day to day living so now I just read one book a day while having “O at a Ds” all day. Plus I have a lot of bacteria in my head from when the vagus nerve transduces the electrochemical energy or jing from my stomach. Since I don’t practice a special diet I just use tea tree oil as an anti-septic.

    So that’s about it — Qigong master Chunyi Lin does healing for people all over the world and he’s worked with the Mayo clinic, the top hospital in the world, showing strong success with late-term cancer, etc. When I took his classes he would demonstrate telepathy to me and he would shoot out energy balls from his hands and look into my body, causing particular parts to burn with bliss, etc. He said he created another physical body and he’s trained with even Yan Xin’s teacher! Chunyi Lin spent at least a month in a cave with no food, no water and no sleep — just sitting in full-lotus. The closest thing I’ve seen to his work is the teacher you studied with who most know as John Chang and also the Wang, Lingpi biography, “Opening the Dragon Gate” and also Dr. Yan Xin.

    Thanks for sharing.

    drew hempel

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mobile menu - fractal