Click here to support the Daily Grail for as little as $US1 per month on Patreon

Resurrecting the Quest for the Ark

Was Graham Hancock on the right track with his book The Sign and the Seal (Amazon US and UK)? A news story doing the rounds provocatively announces that German archaeologists may have traced the Ark of the Covenant to a temple in Ethiopia – claiming that they have found the remains of the palace of the Queen of Sheba, which has within it an altar “that may have held the Ark”:

Professor Helmut Ziegert, of the archaeological institute at the University of Hamburg, has been supervising a dig in Aksum, northern Ethiopia, since 1999. “From the dating, its position and the details that we have found, I am sure that this is the palace,” he said.

The palace, that is, of the Queen of Sheba, who is believed to have lived in the 10th century B.C. After she died, her son and successor, Menelek, replaced the palace with a temple dedicated to Sirius.

The German researchers believe that the Ark was taken from Jerusalem by the queen — who had a liaison with King Solomon — and built into the altar to Sirius.

“The results we have suggest that a Cult of Sothis developed in Ethiopia with the arrival of Judaism and the Ark of the Covenant, and continued until 600 A.D.,” an announcement by the University of Hamburg on behalf of the research team said.

Interesting story, although other archaeologists are skeptical. Not to mention my own cynicism about the timing of the story, coming shortly before Indiana Jones makes his long awaited reappearance…

Editor
  1. I’m a bit mystified
    Can anyone explain why a “Cult of Sothis” should have been the outcome of the possible arrival in Ethiopia of Judaism along with the Ark of the Covenant? The one doesn’t seem to me to have any connection with the other.

    Regards, Kathrinn

    1. I agree
      Only if the star had a deep significance, like being the beacon of the Mesiah’s arrival. But that theory is flawed since the concept of the Messiah hadn’t appeared by the time judaism was imported to Ethiopia.

      Nevertheless, judaism had been greatly influenced by egypcian mysticism and astrology, and Sirius was important for the egyptians.

      —–
      It’s not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me…
      It’s all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!

      Red Pill Junkie

      1. Sothis/Sirius
        I agree with all you say, Red – however …

        Sirius was important to the Egyptians as the heliacal rising of the star heralded their annual Nile flood and land regeneration.

        This would have been of no interest to the Israelites (Jews) who do not appear to have been in the least astronomically minded. They could even have considered an interest in Sirius as a cult-figure akin to the worship of an icon or ‘graven image’ if Sirius were to have been sufficiently elevated to the status of a Deity.

        And yes, Judaism became established in part of Ethiopia, but I think it unlikely they also transported Sirius with them as a cult or culture heroine, despite their past associations with Egypt.

        Sirius could well have been important to the Ethiopians, but I still can’t see any connection to the Ark of the Covenant.

        And so, to me, the mystery remains.

        Regards, Kathrinn

        1. atavisms?
          Rituals and customs often loose their original meaning with the passage of time. Look what happened to Halloween… or Christmas! 😉

          —–
          It’s not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me…
          It’s all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!

          Red Pill Junkie

          1. So do I
            A really interesting mystery. I wish it will be solved within our lifetimes.

            Or… maybe I don’t. Life is cooler with a few mysteries to pop up once in a while 🙂

            —–
            It’s not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me…
            It’s all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!

            Red Pill Junkie

  2. Quest for the ark
    By no means an afficianado of (or particularly versed in) Hancock as such, but I have always thought his take on the ark the most credible of his theories (regardless of the original provenance they might carry), the most convincing aspect of which being the deep long history of Judaism in Ethiopia as well as the living religious/cultural importance of the ark and the long deeply held traditions which are said to exist to this day in Ethiopia. Do not such traditions tend to have to have some central focus in order to become traditions? Is not the reason, really, that one believes in the historical Jesus that we cannot imagine what we see day to day could exist without a real man to, in some way, inspire it all? I would not be at all surprised to find that there is a large smattering of truth in these ideas.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mobile menu - fractal