Click here to support the Daily Grail for as little as $US1 per month on Patreon

Tuesday Roundup 02-08-2005

A varied list of readings to get you through the week…

Enjoy!

Editor
  1. Another terrific article by Fillip Coppens
    I really loved this weeks article although I like all Coppens’ stuff.
    I had no idea that William Blake was interested in Druids.I’ve always been interested in Blake for his spiritual writings but assumed that he was probably C of E.
    Great stuff.
    I will save it as usual.

    shadows

  2. Whitley
    I have been listening to Whitley’s Dreamland for some time now and am always enthralled with the material. His writing is very honest and always enjoyable. I first heard of his site from the grail and visit everyday.

    Thanks Greg.
    H.

    1. Double-Dutch
      Hi Errad,

      I think Filip’s first language is Dutch (he may correct me!), so it might pay to keep in mind that he is not writing in his ‘natural’ language. One thing’s for sure, his essays make more sense than mine would if I wrote them in Dutch…
      😉

      Peace and Respect
      Greg
      ——————————————-
      You monkeys only think you’re running things

      1. Ik Ook!
        Ik Ook! However,if his first language is Dutch then it would make even more sense to have someone proofread it first. It is nothing to do with being ungrateful, Shadow, it is about having a bit of respect and consideration for your reader; something I thought all writers considered pretty important.

        1. Sometimes they don’t have time
          Errad, I think you are being a bit difficult here.Some writers do not have access to proof readers for a simple article.I know I don’t.I am a rather good proof reader myself and yet mistakes slip through in my writings.
          If you are just going to criticise an internet article for the spelling and grammar mistakes then I think you are on the wrong website.
          There is so much information put out here on this site on a daily basis that only God could be perfect.
          And to split hairs over such a trivial thing when the gist of the article is wonderful shows where you are coming from.

          shadows

          1. Sorry, my mistake. I was unde
            Sorry, my mistake. I was under the impression that comment was invited irrespective of whether it was positive or negative. I had no idea that I had strayed into an uncritical fan club.

            I think that in future I will stick to reading and keep my old-fashined notions of propriety to myself.

          2. you’re being a bit silly mate
            Hi Errad,

            You’re going over the top with this so I suspect your feelings are hurt.
            Constructive criticism is always good but there is not much sense in taking a shot at someone who gives us excellent articles but who also has a little problem with English.
            It’s strange that I have not noticed the problems of which you speak as in another life I used to look for that sort of thing so I could shoot the writers down.

            The criticism of which I speak is the sort that decides whether an article makes sense or it is a beat-up and whether it adds to the total of interesting knowledge on this site or detracts from it.

            You are smart Errad and you have much to contribute.I am looking forward to hearing what your feelings are on a lot of subjects.

            Pax,

            shadows

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mobile menu - fractal