A password will be emailed to you.

After posting the latest Scientific American contents on Tuesday, I felt moved to write a little about their resident ‘skeptic’ Michael Shermer (and I use the single quotes to denote his self-proclaimed title, not my designation). It is quite amazing to me that a publication with the pedigree of Sciam could enlist such an amateur ‘skeptic’ – in my short essay ‘The Shermer Sham‘, I give just a few examples of his biased and weak logic, and ask whether it’s time that Sciam dumped him. Your thoughts?