Click here to support the Daily Grail for as little as $US1 per month on Patreon

News Briefs 07-12-2009

My silicon chip and I are both totally shattered from me reading what seems like a million articles on climate change this weekend — so you won’t have to.

Thanks to Nick.

Quote of the Day:

Norman Borlaug, who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1970 for his work on the “Green Revolution” [boosting grain production to keep pace with worldwide population growth], wrote the afterword of my End of the Game [1965] book with me. He was, he said in his acceptance speech for the prize, very honoured to get the award but did they realise he was pouring gasoline on a fire? Because more food means more people. [Borlaug] knew the end result would be over-population and nature’s destruction, but nobody listened to him. Leonardo da Vinci talked about this in the 1490s. He said humans are monsters with these enormous teeth eating up the world. And when they’ve eaten everything, they’ll want to go up to heaven, but the weight of their stomachs will keep them down, and their bodies make a tomb.

Photographer Peter Beard, in a recent interview.

  1. Mass cannibalism
    We don’t know that. We might know that the ancient humans stripped the flesh from the bones of the bodies with knives; but we don’t know what they did with the flesh —whether they consume it, or maybe burn it as part of a burial ritual.

    We do know there was an ancient tradition of trying to get the corpses of the dead stripped of flesh through more “natural” mean, from the evidence found in sites like Catal Hüyuk, where the bodies were placed in an area where vultures and other carrion beasts would clean them of any tissue.

    Maybe the so-called mass cannibalism was part of a burial ritual as well, but my point is: talking abut cannibalism is still speculatory at this point. But for me to accept the theory of cannibalism would require a human coprolite with little pieces of human bones in it.

    BTW, Catal Hüyk and Gobekli Tepe are thoroughly discussed in the latest edition of Darklore —in case you haven’t sent your letter to Santa yet 😉

  2. The arguments made by climate change sceptics
    “Furthermore, while the UK Met Office regards 1998 as the hottest year yet, Nasa thinks it was 2005 (they use the same data but interpret it differently).”

    Very reassuring.

  3. Leonardo
    I think that Leonardo’s comments on the number of people reflects the attitude of many who think themselves better than the common man or woman: there can’t be too few people for them.

  4. Voynich
    The Voynich is clearly a right brain exercise, not the left. Doesn’t come apart for logic. I’m inclined to think that Edith’s on the right track… it’s playful. Unlike most of the ‘experts’ it puzzled.

    Maybe the Jesuits grabbed it from somebody they ‘saved’. Possibly it’s a copy of an original (the church had a copyist or two … see ‘Name of the Rose’) – and so the dating would be misleading. It keeps its secret close.

    1. Voynich
      The Voynich is a lot of knot, and you’ll need both left-brain and right-brain working hard to make any, ummm, headway. 🙂

      Don’t forget that the Society of Jesus was founded roughly a century after the current dating, and it didn’t get to Athanasius Kircher until a further century after that.

      I’m pretty sure it is an enciphered copy of a set of other documents… but that’s another story. 🙂

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mobile menu - fractal