You Monkeys Are Not Ready for ET Contact!

It is quite possibly every middle-aged geek’s wet dream, aside of a working hover-board: That fateful day when humans finally get to shake hands, claws or tentacles with ambassadors from another world; the watershed moment when we’ll finally know for certain that we’re not alone in the universe, and a new chapter –or rather, an entire volume– in the history of our species would commence.

I’ve been ready for that moment all of my life, ever since I heard that seminal 5-tone sequence in Close Encounters of the Third Kind, but what about humanity as a whole? That’s what Gabriel G. De la Torre, a professor of psychology from the University of CΓ‘diz in Spain, sought to find out. His conclusions: We still need a looot of growin’ up to do before we can hang out with the big boys of the galactic playground.

De la Torre is a corresponding member of the International Academy of Astronautics (IAA) and has been part of several committees related to space-oriented projects. In a paper published on the IAA’s Acta Astronautica titled Toward a New Cosmic Consciousness: Psychoeducational Aspects of Contact with Extraterrestrial Civilizations, he analyzed the preliminary results of a written questionnary he applied to 116 college students from Spain, Italy & the USA, to assess whether our current level of awareness would be capable of handling the deep psychological impact, of discoverying and/or contacting an extraterrestrial civilization. His concern is that several cultural factors –religion in particular– would tend to skew our opinion & expectations about the aliens; are they friends or enemies? conquerors or saviors? Like anything else we interact with, there would be an unconscious tendency to anthropomorphize these non-human entities.

We estimate that this type of event will have not only a social effect but also on both consciousness and biology as well. Some authors [16] believe that an anthropocentric vision can influence the benevolent or malevolent perception of a possible EC.The variables that produce these misperceptions or interpretation biases with regard to this type of event are related to what we called modular aspects of cosmic consciousness.

I must say that after reading De la Torre’s paper, I found it something of a mixed bag. Yes, organized religions tend to color the prejudice of a great percentage of the population –although it must be pointed out that all the participating students in his study were living in Christian nations, and that he initially focused on the 80 of them who were from Spain, where Catholicism still has a great influence– but I think most Grailers would agree with me when I say you can also find a lot of biased opinions among non-religious individuals. When Louis Pasteur was trying to support the case for germ theory, arguing that diseases like cholera or anthrax were caused by a whole realm of tiny organisms which are invisible to the naked eye, I hardly suspect whatever resistance he encountered was fueled by the lack of mention of microbes in the Bible…

What’s more, De la Torre seems to follow the party-line assumption that alien contact has yet to occur, even though a significant amount of his study subjects considered UFOs “are a real phenomenon that explains that beings from other worlds are visiting us today;” and yet further along on the paper he states that although an open contact would be the most likely scenario, “a covert or unconscious contact is another possibility we should not discard.” If De la Torre is so preoccupied with the social & biological effects of alien contact, perhaps he should pay more attention to Jacques Vallee’s ‘cultural thermostat’ theory of UFOs, and his ideas of how this phenomenon acts like a control system slowly shaping our cultural, and perhaps even physical evolution.

Not that De la Torre is a hard materialist per se, mind you. There’s a part in the paper where he gives a little shout-out to Roger Penrose & Stuart Hameroff’s quantum consciousness theory, and he even speculates whether consciousness may play a bigger role in the structure of the Universe than we’re currently aware of. Like I said, mixed bag.

In the end I guess the matter is something of a paradox: Nothing could ever fully prepare our world for the cultural shock of ET contact, and realizing it’s not just us floating about in all this ‘wasted space’; and yet facing that truth would greatly accelerate our shift from a local awareness to thinking in a much, much broader scale. Like Richard Dolan & Brice wrote in their book After Disclosure: The People’s Guide to Life After Contact, when they equated it to parenthood –no matter who you are, you’re NEVER ready to become a parent, but when the time comes you learn the ropes as you go along.

While he tries to continue with his research, applying his little questionnaire to more students from other nations, De la Torre has already found a deficiency in astronomy & space-related knowledge among the subjects studied so far; he proposes that aside from scanning the skies in search of that long-waited ET tweet, SETI should also focus some of its efforts in devising strategies to improve the education of astronomy is school curricula.

Extensive education outreach and efforts to increase awareness of Space related topics and existent relationships between Cosmos, Earth and life can be extremely helpful. SETI can take an important role in this regard.

That’s all well & good, but if we’re REALLY serious about achieving that cosmic consciousness of his, how about we start including some magic mushrooms in school lunches, too? πŸ˜‰

  1. We’re not ready?
    My knee jerk reaction to De la Torre is…ya think? But this paper is interesting.

    I would submit though, that it’s unlikely we ever will be “ready” for such contact.

    In the words of my favourite MIB operative K- “A person is smart. People are dumb panicky animals, and you know it.”

    1. ready?
      Actually, with all the thought and writing and philosophy that has bee put into this, we are way ready.

      It’s those others, they are just too slow.

      1. Too slow
        The slowness may be relative. If we’re talking about civilizations that are thousands of years more advanced than us, then waiting a few hundred years more might be nothing for them.

        But we should also ask, where would be the incentive? whatever they might find interesting about us & our culture would be completely obliterated the moment they made open contact. Even benevolent aliens wouldn’t be able to avoid ending human civilization as we know it by their mere presence, just like in Arthur C Clarke’s novel Childhood’s End

        1. remotely
          well yeah, it would be shocking for us.

          For them, if you assume that they could contact us, then we are assuming that they are ahead of us by at least 200 years.

          Why would they bother? Conquest across stellar distances doesn’t make sense, economically. Neither does trade, all the raw materials are pretty much everywhere.

          What does that leave? Culture perhaps? I’m sure Carlos Santana is the only one in the universe πŸ™‚

          1. Santana

            In the end, trying to understand the motives & motivation of an ET civilization is a very frustrating exercise. By the very definition of the term, an alien intelligence is crazy.

            But if they happen to like Santana, maybe not that crazy πŸ˜‰

          2. Let’s Not Forget About It
            I’ve heard of people going a long ways to see a concert, but that takes the prize.

          3. Right on!
            The folly of SETI & ‘serious’ ET hunters, is to assume an extraterrestrial intelligence would ALWAYS act intelligently πŸ˜‰

          4. There’s Just Something About SETI
            Yeah, a few of those far, far away civilizations should have done a little more homework before sending their space balls out into the interplanetary woods!

            I have to admit that it’s difficult for me to take the human race seriously any more. Maybe we are just here for entertainment value to ET’s in transit.

            Supposedly when Jimmy Carter got the ET brief, he just sat in the oval office and cried. How should we interpret that response? He has continued to do humanitarian work, so it’s fairly obvious that whatever he learned did not make him lose hope. But, then again, can we take Jimmy Carter seriously?

          5. Carter
            Ah. I’ve heard of that story, and how Bush Sr. tried to use the UFO secret as a bargaining chip to keep his job. Fascinating stuff, albeit unprovable –until Carter is on his deathbed at least πŸ˜‰

          6. Most interesting account I
            Most interesting account I have read about humans trying to figure out what the ET’s are up to is Jim Sparks’ “The Keepers.” He was subjected to all kinds of irritation and donkey and carrot stuff inflicted on him by the aliens who were attempting to teach him their alphabet and and highly advanced, super efficient grammar.

            Art Bell’s interview with Sparks:

          7. What’s Learned with Pleasure is Learned Full Measure
            That is so crazy it’s believable! Haven’t the ET’s ever heard of profiling? Sounds like the married, church-going workaholic was trying very hard not to figure out what ET was up to. The old school “learning techniques” recall those of the strict disciplinarian Thoth of the Egyptian pantheon, who also is incidentally credited with hieroglyphs.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.