Click here to support the Daily Grail for as little as $US1 per month on Patreon

News Briefs 28-07-2011

By Rick MGon

Deepest sympathies to our Norwegian readers.

Thanks Kat, Greg, & Ryan.

Quote of the Day:

I’m a guy that lives with a lot of questions. I say “What’s out there?”, and I try to resolve that. And I never can. I don’t think anybody can. Who’s got the answers? I sure would like to hear the ultimate one. But I haven’t yet. And so I live with a lot of questions.

And I find that entertaining… If my life were to end tomorrow, it would be fulfilled in that manner. I would say, “The questions have been terrific.”

~ Jack Kirby

Rick MG
Related

14 Comments

  1. Trickster
    enjoyed the “Why the Trickster archetype is a weak argument for the paranormal.”. always felt people were kind of missing the point on the whole Trickster thing. nice post.

      1. US aircraft being tested
        I’ve heard about that theory plenty of times. So far I haven’t seen incontrovertible evidence to substantiate it.

        How is it that these aircraft were capable of outmaneuver the NATO jets that were scrambled to intercept them, for instance, along with the capacity to hover in one place indefinitely.

        I do not discount the very real possibility that the USAF has already the replacement for the Stealth fighter, the B2, and maybe even the Space Shuttle.

        But the Belgian triangles behaved in ways that seem to be as far away from our current level of avionics, as the Wright brothers’ glider is from a F-16.

        1. Red Pill Junkie
          “But the Belgian triangles behaved in ways that seem to be as far away from our current level of avionics, as the Wright brothers’ glider is from a F-16.”

          The reality is that we are approximately at 300 years in advance of any aircraft yet publicly exposed. I am not a fan of flight so my description of traveling aboard classified standard use aircraft would not be accurate.

          “I do not discount the very real possibility that the USAF has already the replacement for the Stealth fighter, the B2, and maybe even the Space Shuttle.”

          Manned space flight as defined in terms by the award of the United States Astronaut Badge takes place everyday.

          “How is it that these aircraft were capable of outmaneuver the NATO jets that were scrambled to intercept them, for instance, along with the capacity to hover in one place indefinitely.”

          Technical advancements discovered by the United States which are incorporated in our classified aircraft are not generally shared with N.A.T.O. nations. These classified aircraft do not fly under the authority of the United States Air Force but are directly commanded by the Council of National Defense. Despite this fact the majority of pilots flying these aircraft are members of the U.S. Military. Some advanced technology is shared with the United Kingdom. Many of these aircraft could in theory hover in place for thousands of years if no major mechanical malfunction took place which would be highly likely over that period of time.

          “I’ve heard about that theory plenty of times. So far I haven’t seen incontrovertible evidence to substantiate it.”

          If the Council of National Defense does its job you properly will never see any incontrovertible evidence.

          1. Technical advances
            But here’s the paradox: you claim the United States is indeed in possession of this incredible technology, meanwhile its economy is crumbling as we speak, and the (official) space program is a pale shadow of its former self.

            In what way does the United States benefit from withholding these ‘black’ technologies indefinitely, if the entire nation goes bankrupt?

          2. Debunking the US test flights
            If the USA was secretly testing black ops aircraft, without informing NATO countries — that is a serious breach of protocol.

            “One theory can be definitely dismissed, however, since the Belgian Armed Forces have been positively assured by American authorities that there has never been any sort of American aerial test flight,” – Belgium defense minister Leo Delcroix, 1992 (source).

            Ret. Major General Wilfred De Brouwer has also gone on the record to state no American test flights were in operation in Belgian airspace during the UFO wave.

            Now you can say De Brouwer has been ordered to keep his mouth shut (in which case, you’re calling him a liar, and everything I’ve seen and heard shows him to be an honest man), you can say America assures a lot of people about a lot of shady things they continue to do, but the black ops aircraft explanation has been debunked by people in the know.

            One photo does not debunk near a thousand civilian, law enforcement, and military eyewitnesses who clearly described what they saw to be physical, flying objects. When the photo was released, there had already been months of reputable sightings (the wave began November 1989 and “ended” April 1990), so it’s to be expected the class clowns would muddy the waters with hoaxes. If skeptics think the Belgian UFO wave was just secret black ops technology… well, they just admitted UFOs exist. 😉

            Personally, I wonder at the timing of the photo hoax admission.

          3. SAPs
            Supposedly there are SAPs (Special Access Programs) that are part of the so-called ‘black budget’, in which the people involved are required to lie in case they are questioned about their program.

          4. The public are the saps. 😉
            This brings us back to the problem with the blacks ops explanation though — the USA is staring at the bottom of the economic barrel after a century of domination, the wars in the Middle East continue to go nowhere… if this technology is working as designed, why aren’t they using it more widely? The Belgian UFOs were 22 years ago — how far advanced is the tech now?

            The black ops explanation raises more questions than it answers.

          5. That it does
            I agree, it’s like the people behind these black ops are so near-sighted and tunnel-visioned about the bigger picture, they behave almost like automatons! what’s the use of a 2-billion stealth drone if you can’t pay your debts to the Chinese? you’d think the Yanks would have learned a thing or two about the collapse of the Russkies 😉

          6. Secret Stealth Helicopter
            [quote=red pill junkie]the people behind these black ops are so near-sighted and tunnel-visioned about the bigger picture[/quote]

            That sums up most governments. 😉

            The stealth-modified Blackhawk is the level of black ops technology the US is at (or are willing to use, anyway). We only know about it because it crashed on the way back from the Osama Bin Laden raid in Pakistan. Note that it’s not the helicopter per se, but the modifications.

            It’s the 21st Century. Even the President is asking, “where’s my hovercar dammit?”

          7. Red Pill Junkie
            “But here’s the paradox: you claim the United States is indeed in possession of this incredible technology, meanwhile its economy is crumbling as we speak, and the (official) space program is a pale shadow of its former self.

            In what way does the United States benefit from withholding these ‘black’ technologies indefinitely, if the entire nation goes bankrupt?”

            I don’t believe it does benefit but my opinion is in the minority. What the real Illuminati have planned for the United States is worse than Orwell’s 1984. Don’t get me wrong they will let you have faster computers, better chips for better video games and they make money from it. The worse it gets for you the better it is for them. I find this sick.

            Mr. X
            http://www.dailygrail.com/blogs/MRXUSA

  2. Regarding the “:timeslip” event
    Regarding the story of the Naval cadets and timeslip event at Kersey, England,

    There is another interesting possibility that I’ve come across. In 1957, the BBC was filming a documentary entitled “The England of Elizabeth”. It ran for a little less than a half hour, but the opening scenes were of Tudor houses and streets. I’d think it worth the time to try and see where those scenes were filmed because it might well have been Kersey, and that would explain a great deal about the butcher shop, the sides of beef being props, and also the “greasy windows”, as glass is routinely dulled on sets so as not to cast light reflections and cause film artifacts & lens flares.

    I may be wrong, but if it was dressed as a set, and the shooting done, or not yet started, our intrepid cadets might have simply walked onto a dressed set while the dressers and props folks were away.

    respects,

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mobile menu - fractal