Click here to support the Daily Grail for as little as $US1 per month on Patreon

News Briefs 23-05-2011

Has Greg been conjuring up some Merlin-level fog in Brisbane?

Quote of the Day:

Left to their own devices, [internet] personalization filters serve up a kind of invisible autopropaganda, indoctrinating us with our own ideas, amplifying our desire for things that are familiar, and leaving us oblivious to the dangers lurking in the dark territory of the unknown.

In the filter bubble, there’s less room for the chance encounters that bring insight and learning. Creativity is often sparked by the collision of ideas from different disciplines and cultures. Combine an understanding of cooking and physics, and you get the nonstick pan and the induction stovetop. But if Amazon thinks I’m interested in cookbooks, it’s not very likely to show me books about metallurgy. It’s not just serendipity that’s at risk.

By definition, a world constructed from the familiar is a world in which there’s nothing to learn. If personalization is too acute, it could prevent us from coming into contact with the mind-blowing, preconception-shattering experiences and ideas that change how we think about the world and ourselves.

Eli Pariser, in the TED Talk What the Internet knows about you. Pariser’s book The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You is available at Amazon US & UK.

  1. Thermodynamics Of An Intelligent Living Universe (Hail S?)
    It was a bit of a confusing article. So, living things are the Universe’s solution to accelerating Entropy (disorder) in order to achieve equilibrium… but we humans are bad because with our shenanigans we impede Life’s goal of fastening the death of the Universe?

    We could reverse the argument and conclude that we humans ARE meant to be the way we are in order to delay the slow freezing death of the Universe 😉

    In truth, I think there are some things we might want to include in any argument dealing with Entropy. IMO Information is much more interesting that Energy, or to put it in other terms, the more desirable end result of work achieved through the application of energy. If you hammer down a block of marble, you might be increasing the thermodynamic Entropy of that stone matrix, but you’re adding something which the stone itself could never be able to have: a shape meant to convey some kind of emotional response.

    So in a sense humans are adding something to the system. We are adding complexity into the Universe by a way of increasing the amount of information —ideas, dreams, designs, machinations— in an otherwise Universe full of potential but devoid of purpose. So does that make us pro-Entropy or anti-Entropy?

    Furthermore, are we really certain that we live in a closed-system Universe? how does M Theory affect the Laws of Thermodynamics?

    Or maybe I just need to hear more of MC Hawking’s lyrics, yo 😛

    1. …intelligent living universe
      It’s not an article — it’s an essay.

      I was hoping it might stimulate some thought, and maybe even some discussion, on the dark energy/entropy news.

      One down, 14,999 to go. 😉

      How’d you like Greg’s fog?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mobile menu - fractal