Click here to support the Daily Grail for as little as $US1 per month on Patreon

News Briefs 17-01-2011

Bacterial and viral DNA can teleport? Now that’s a paradigm shifter!

Big thanks to Moezilla and Red Pill Junkie.

We have found that DNA produces structural changes in water, which persist at very high dilutions, and which lead to resonant electromagnetic signals that we can measure. Not all DNA produces signals that we can detect with our device. The high-intensity signals come from bacterial and viral DNA. We have found these signals coming from bacterial DNA in the plasma of many patients with autism, and also in most, if not all, patients with Alzheimer, Parkinson’s disease, and multiple sclerosis.

Nobel Prize winning biologist Luc Montagnier.

  1. DNA Teleportation

    Montagnier and his team say this suggests DNA emits its own electromagnetic signals that imprint the DNA’s structure on other molecules (like water). Ostensibly this means DNA can project itself from one cell to the next, where copies could be made – something like quantum teleportation of genetic material, a notion that is spooky on multiple levels.

    One man’s electromagnetic signal, is another man’s morphogenetic field…

    Pretty rad stuff. This new study should pave the way nicely for that other unpublished paper on precognition —poor CSICOP dudes are gonna have to work overtime this year 😉

  2. NASA’s sex study (how prudish!)

    “Naturally, if a few males monopolize the available females, the other male astronauts will respond negatively and this may lead to violence. This can be avoided by a rule which relieves the monopolizer of command in cases of sexual monopolization, thereby stripping any male of the high status which made female astronauts prefer him to the other male astronauts.”

    The solution might be even simpler, but it will never fly with the prudish attitudes of NASA’s bureaucracy:

    Assign deep-space long-term missions only to she-male astronauts 😛

    PS: Let me just clarify: my point is that NASA is planning the steps mankind will need to take in the coming decades and centuries to achieve the colonization of other planets, and yet they are viewing at the problem through a *very* narrow cultural perspective. What if the astronauts are Mormons (i.e. polygamous)? What if they are bisexual? Heck, even the study assumed that the commander of the mission is ALWAYS going to be a male.

    If the last history of the world has taught us anything, is that there’s nothing more malleable than the way human beings experience sexuality; and the prospect of becoming a multi-planetary species will do nothing but enhance that proclivity.

  3. The gender equation
    Back in history class (in the days of dinosaurs), someone once asked why females didn’t get drafted and go to war. Our teacher was quick to reply that… in war, many people die. Many, many, many. A nation can lose the flower of an entire generation in a few battles that don’t go their way.

    So… it becomes a matter of math, though it is unlikely that we have ever consciously realized it.

    10 women and 2 men can make 10 babies in a 12 month period. Re-population begins. The two guys get along fine.

    10 men and 2 women make, at most, two babies and 8 of those 10 guys will likely end up dead.

    Yeah… that’s us all over the place.

    1. Interesting
      So under that premise, every fertile woman left at home during a period of war should be entitled to the same veteran benefits as the soldier guys who are lucky enough to return 😉

  4. Your zodiac sign DID Not just get rumbled
    News Flash: The zodiac isn’t wrong. Your sign isn’t changing. Ignore the misinformation.

    Every year or so, another astronomer erupts into the mainstream media with a portentous announcement about how, due to the precession of the equinoxes, the astrological signs are no longer aligned with the actual constellations. Often the supposed 13th constellation, Ophiuchus, is also invoked as a further proof of how delusional astrologers are.

    What it means, according to these experts, is that astrology is invalid. Most of the people who think they’re Tauruses are actually Aries. Most Scorpios are really Libras. And so on.

    That latest offering was, as noted in the link from Daily Grail, from Parke Kunkle, a board member of the Minnesota Planetarium Society. “When [astrologers] say that the sun is in Pisces,” he speculated, “it’s really not in Pisces.”

    I understand that scientists like him would prefer not to lower themselves to the task of actually doing research about how astrology works. But if they’re going to question its foundations, they should at least learn it well enough to know what they’re talking about.

    Here, briefly, is the lowdown on what certain astronomers are too lazy to find out for themselves.

    In modern Western astrology, the astrological signs are not defined by the constellations you see in the sky. In antiquity, when both astrological and astronomical thinking were based on insufficient data, the names of the constellations happened to be paired with the astrological signs. Today, those pairings are no longer in sync: Astrological signs do not line up with the constellations in the same way they did way back then, due to the precession of the equinoxes.

    Modern Western astrologers understand this perfectly. It’s irrelevant to their work because the information upon which they base their hypotheses does not involve a study of distant stars or constellations. Rather, their data have to do with the movements of the planets in our own solar system within a zone of influence defined by the relationship between the Earth and Sun.

    The key demarcation points in that relationship are the equinoxes and solstices. At the Northern Hemisphere’s vernal equinox, which occurs on about March 20th of each year, the Sun enters into the sign of Aries. At the Northern Hemisphere’s summer solstice, the sun enters into the sign of Cancer. The locations of the constellations are irrelevant; the “influence of the stars” isn’t considered.

    To reiterate: Western astrologers don’t work with stars or constellations. Their focus is our solar system. They study the patterns of the planets and the moon as they pass through 12 zones defined by the relationship between the Earth and sun. Those zones have the same names as constellations because of a historical quirk, but they are unrelated to the constellations.

    When Parke Kunkle triumphantly says, “There is no physical connection between constellations and personality traits,” as if he has finally stamped out the delusions of us astrologers, he doesn’t realize that we agree with him completely. We don’t deal with constellations.

    There haven’t been many corrective articles in the mainstream press — most publications have been content to let their un-fact-checked stories stand as if they were gospel — but the New York Times and the Daily Beast did have the journalistic integrity to make a stab: http://nyti.ms/gSSVIq and http://bit.ly/fNEijs.

    Rob Brezsny
    Free Will Astrology

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mobile menu - fractal