Click here to support the Daily Grail for as little as $US1 per month on Patreon

News Briefs 08-02-2010

… not to reproduce what we can already see, but to make visible what we cannot

Thanks Rick

Quote of the Day:

The invisible & the non-existent often look very much alike.

Julia Sweeney

  1. Unwilling messiah?
    The headline is a bit misleading. Share International itself hasn’t been searching for anyone.

    However, it’s understandable that the announcement in Share International magazine, January/February 2010 about the US tv interview of Maitreya, who appeared in the guise of an ordinary person under another name, would meet an enthusiastic response from its readers. Whether these readers have managed to correctly identify this ‘oridinary person’ via their web searches is another matter.

    This announcement wasn’t the only thing of interest in the Jan/Feb issue of Share Internationl:

    UFOs – Their Spiritual Mission (2009 Keynote Talk)

    Includes a huge photo of a UFO taken by a visitor to the Cuzco (ancient Inca city) area of Peru on 16 February 1989. The extraordinary object in the sky was not seen by the photographer nor by the people buying and selling wares on the mountain. Nevertheless, it appears on two photographs taken at different spots, higher and lower on the mountain.

    You may need to adjust your monitor to a darker than usual setting to more clearly see the object in the sky in this photo.

    The star that heralds Maitreya’s emergence

    10-minute YouTube containing numerous videos from around the world of this new ‘star’.

    How to spot the ‘star’
    “It behaves in a way no other celestial object does.” — Benjamin Creme

    The ‘star’
    • resides in our Earth’s atmosphere
    • can move, spin, pulsate and blink
    • can change size and shape (eg round, diamond, hexagonal)
    • can change position in the sky
    • can get closer, and recede, at speed
    • is very bright and sometimes the only star visible
    • can radiate bright colours, often in quick succession
    • has been sighted day and night
    can respond to thought: has been known to appear and move when asked [bold emphasis mine -Kat]
    • several witnesses have even seen all four ‘stars’ together
    • is seen all over the world.

    Note: Benjamin Creme explains that the ‘star’ regularly recharges its energy from the sun and is not always visible. Also note that in cities high-rise buildings can obscure sightings of the ‘star’, so keep watching.

    More about the star, including numerous still shots.

      1. The One?

        “It became a flood,” said Mr. Patel, referring to a torrent of e-mail messages that asked: “Are you The One?” He removed the contact information from his Web site, but dozens of pages, discussion groups and videos have emerged online proclaiming his holiness.

        C’mon! Telling whether he’s The One or not is pretty simple:

        You shoot him; and if he can stop the bullets, then you know! 😛

        As for the ‘Star Sign’ video released by the Share Intl. All I can say is that I’m not convinced. It seems like a collage of UFO Youtube videos (some of which seem like pure misidentifications, magnified by lens flare of the digital camera’s zoom) taken out of context & with no apparent correlation of size, color of form; and they are saying “Yeah, that’s our star”.

        So any weird thing seen in the sky can be used to validate their claim; it’s a win-win with them.

        As for Patel, I remember enjoying his interview at the Colbert report. He seemed intelligent & charming, but the minute Stephen confronted him, he started to stutter and loose his train of thought. All I’m saying is I would expect more from an ascended master…

        And he also doesn’t look like the chap that supposedly materialized in the middle of an African religious gathering.

        1. The ‘star’
          >> ‘As for the ‘Star Sign’ video released by the Share Intl. All I can say is that I’m not convinced. …any weird thing seen in the sky can be used to validate their claim; it’s a win-win with them.’

          That’s one reason I included How to spot the ‘star’, and embolded the line, ‘can respond to thought: has been known to appear and move when asked.’

          I would suggest that as an experiment — if I knew anyone with a video camera who ever looked up at the stars at night.

          But what the heck… RPJ, can you see any stars where you live? If so, maybe you could check the weather reports for several nights in a row that are apt to be relatively cloudless, and then we could coordinate a ‘thought request’ for this ‘star’ to appear over your city between dusk and midnight, and stay visible there for at least 30 minutes on any one of those cloudless nights. What do you think?

          1. Hmmm
            Stars are more visible during the winter days. And also, there has been a lot of winds and rain lately, which helps with the pollution.

            So yeah, I think observing a powerfully enough celestial feature is possible in this neck of the woods 🙂

  2. Now listen ‘ere…
    From Monty Python’s Life of Brian:

    Look, you’ve got it all wrong. You don’t need to follow me. You don’t need to follow anybody. You’ve got to think for yourselves. You’re all individuals!

    Yes, we’re all individuals.

    You’re all different!

    Yes, we’re all different.

    You’re all got to work it out for yourselves! …

    Curiously similar to something else from the Jan/Feb 2010 issue of Share International:
    The Art of Self-Realization, Part 1.

    Full disclosure (as they say in the msm):
    I’ve been reading Share International for decades, and my car tag has said MITREYA for at least 15 years (ever since I’ve been able to afford a ‘vanity plate’). I haven’t done any web searches trying to find him — possibly because six years ago I telepathed to him that I really needed someone to talk to, and 3 days later he appeared in my living room, and was there with me for about 30 minutes.

  3. Hedgehog artifact???
    Either archaeologists don’t often study wildlife or someone has a very vivid imagination – that could be anything. In fact it looks more like a wombat, and I don’t suppose there have been too many of them wandering about Salisbury Plain!

    Regards, Kathrinn

        1. Well, yes. The news was the
          Well, yes. The news was the evidence for hedges, but I couldn’t resist the link with the hedgehog. And it IS a hedgehog. No miserable cynic will persuade me otherwise 😉

          To be serious for a moment, I wonder how much this will add to our understanding of Stonehenge. A hedge is a hedge, for dividing space, for keeping out/in livestock/people or symbolically, for dividing the sacred from the less sacred, keeping out/in spirits.

          The evidence for two hedges does also suggest a pathway. I also wonder if the archaeologists will be able to tell what species of tree the hedges were built from. Were they evergreen or deciduous? I’d be willing to bet on the former.

          Perhaps the space between the hedges was like the ‘pit’ between the stage and the audience, patrolled by bouncers.

          1. symbolic and practical
            Two levels of hedges could be there for many different reasons. A hierarchy of spiritual levels. Or an outside hedge could keep the small animals out of the sacred places. Or it could serve as a snow break, to keep snowdrifts from covering the centre. Although I’m not sure that works.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mobile menu - fractal