Click here to support the Daily Grail for as little as $US1 per month on Patreon

News Briefs 12-04-2007

If I’m covering for Greg, who covered for Kat, who covered for me, then who’s covering for Jameske?

  • Locks of 3200-year-old hair from Ramses II were unveiled at the Egyptian Museum, stolen 30 years ago in France. So that’s why Zahi Hawass wears the hat.
  • The decorated tombs of the Valley of the Kings are deteriorating faster than they can be preserved.
  • The tomb of Djehuty, overseer of works at Thebes during Queen Hatshepsut’s reign, amazed Egyptologists not only because of its unique architecture, but the artifacts inside.
  • Clothing ornaments thought to confer supernatural powers were all the rage among important people in England 4000 years ago. Probably because those considered unimportant were cursing them.
  • A mountain village in Umbria wants a 2600-year-old Etruscan chariot restored and displayed by the Metropolitan Museum of Art in NYC returned or else. I wonder if they’ll drive it back.
  • Like an ancient Chinese number puzzle, archaeologists have unearthed more than 5000 items dating back 2000 years from a complex of 385 tombs discovered in Mongolia.
  • The 3000-year-old city of Jinsha, including a palace and 800 tombs, is being excavated in Chengdu, Sichuan Province.
  • Restoration work has begun on the tomb of Takamatsuzuka in Japan, its murals damaged by fungus.
  • Anthropologist discovers new evidence suggesting ancient farmers in Mexico cultivated maize almost 1200 years earlier than previously thought.
  • The Aztec kidnapped sacrificial victims from as far away as Mayan, Pacific and Atlantic coastal communities, according to DNA analysis of over 50 skeletons discovered at Teotihuacan’s Pyramid of the Moon.
  • The Sun is more active now than it has been at anytime in the previous 1000 years. Before that, it was the Dark Ages.
  • Danny Boyle and Alex Garland’s film Sunshine couldn’t be better timed. Except maybe a 2012 release.
  • Astronomers have detected water in the atmosphere of a planet outside our solar system for the first time.
  • The Pentagon’s National Security Space Office (NSSO) is considering the possibility of using satellites to collect solar energy for use on Earth.
  • Researchers report that the Earth’s magnetic field was at least half as strong 3.2 billion years ago as it is today.
  • NASA scientists have discovered that a mysterious red glow, seen throughout the Milky Way and other galaxies but never on Earth, radiates from extremely fine dust.
  • Space tourist Charles Simonyi is all smiles about the International Space Station. I’d be smiling too if I were him.
  • A former American astronaut is accused of intending to kidnap an ex-lover, wearing nappies and possessing X-rated bondage images. The Astronaut’s Wife starring Johnny Depp and Charlize Theron might be worth watching again.
  • Do blogs need classifications for coarse language and some nudity, and do some bloggers use freedom of speech as an excuse?
  • The amount of spam originating from China dropped dramatically in the first three months of 2007, according to a US IT security firm. What happened to you, China? You used to be cool.
  • An international science journal has deleted a South Korean paper on wolf cloning from its website pending an investigation into incorrect data. Does that make Dolly a wolf in sheep’s clothing?
  • Research has found that children who eat a traditional Mediterranean diet are 30% less likely to develop hayfever and asthma. I’m going to a traditional Greek wedding on Saturday, so I’ll pig out.
  • Participants in an experiment exploring egalitarian impulses in human nature consistently robbed from the rich and gave to the poor, suggesting there’s a Robin Hood in all of us. There’s a Sheriff of Nottingham in political and religious leaders too.
  • Archaeologists are excavating a house they think may have belonged to legendary Scottish outlaw Rob Roy.
  • A British man who dreamed a phone number then called it out of curiosity has married the woman whom it belonged to. *Sigh* I only dream of 0055 numbers with hot, sexy female voice-overs.
  • A book review of How to Predict Your Future: Secrets of Eastern and Western Astrology by James Braha (Amazon US or UK).
  • Nick “UFO Mystic” Redfern discusses the British Ministry of Defense’s chilling report that paints a strange and bleak view of our future 30 years from now. The Guardian has an article about the MoD’s report which is worth reading.
  • As Hillary’s presidential campaign gears up, researchers, journalists and the curious are finding it difficult to access the William Jefferson Clinton Presidential Library, including UFO files.
  • RIP Kurt Vonnegut, 1922 – 2007. So it goes.

Quote of the Day:

A democracy which makes or even effectively prepares for modern, scientific war must necessarily cease to be democratic. No country can be really well prepared for modern war unless it is governed by a tyrant, at the head of a highly trained and perfectly obedient bureaucracy.

Aldous Huxley

  1. The Sun is more active now…
    Maybe this explains Al Gore’s strange behavior? Among other things….

    Oh, and Aldous Huxley is a freakin’ moron. I’m just sayin’…

    1. If you’re just sayin’…
      Are you basing your opinion soley on Huxley’s quote or anything else? Because you are the first person I have ever heard mention “moron” and “Aldous Huxley” in the same sentence. Or maybe you’re just really confused.

      1. Huxley
        This quote. Other quotes. Pretty much most of what his drug-addled brain has come up with. I know, I know…how dare I blaspheme this legendary and inspiring icon of self-anointed intellectual stoners everywhere. I’m such a hate-monger.

        1. Hate-monging
          I wouldn’t say a hate-monger. I’d just say laughably wrong. Have you read any of Huxley’s books? There’s plenty online, so go do it before labelling him ‘a moron’. I think you’ll find that you may turn a very deep shade of red afterward.

          Of course, he’s never going to reach the high intellectual peaks of “I know that the human being and the fish can coexist peacefully”, but there are only so-many true geniuses in each generation…
          😉

          Kind regards,
          Greg
          ——————————————-
          You monkeys only think you’re running things

          1. Funny
            Funny how when someone hears something they don’t like they automatically assume the person who said it is ignorant, stupid or “just laughably wrong”. Where are we to end up if a person’s OPINION is summarily judged “wrong” just because we don’t agree with it (what would Huxley think about that?) ? Well, we end up with the assault on free speech that the Left has been engaged in for many years. But that’s ok, since such a judgment is just another opinion. And as such, just as open to debate (to the Left’s consternation).

            But maybe I’m wrong because the man’s IQ puts him well out of range of the moron percentile? That I would concede, but then I don’t think describing someone as a moron has anything to do with their IQ, but rather their application of that IQ.

            Of course I’ve read Huxley. Who hasn’t read Brave New World? As well as Island. But in my OPINION, Huxley, and most of his ardent fans, confuse his cynicism and unconditional pacifism (and later, heavy doses of narcotics) for intellectualism. If you were a Haight-Ashbury hippie coming of age in San Francisco in the 60’s, than that is exactly your definition. If you are a normal person, who actually lives, works and loves in the real world, then it just describes someone who never worked a real day in his life or lived among the real working class (the middle-class), and can’t differentiate (or accept) reality from utopian longing, but did manage to write an interesting book.

          2. Universal Irony FTW
            [quote=Anonymous]Funny how when someone hears something they don’t like they automatically assume the person who said it is ignorant, stupid or “just laughably wrong”. [/quote]

            Or even a “freakin’ moron“? You know, just with the ‘universal irony’ and all, that’s one of the funniest things I’ve read this year. I’m just sayin’…
            😉

            [quote]Where are we to end up if a person’s OPINION is summarily judged “wrong” just because we don’t agree with it[/quote]

            I could labour the point, but I think I’ve covered it all above…

            Kind regards,
            Greg
            ——————————————-
            You monkeys only think you’re running things

          3. that’s one of the funniest

            Or even a “freakin’ moron”

            Yeah, I’ve got to cut back on satirical provocation as a means for stimulating debate. Too many people just don’t get it. I blame the impersonal nature of the Internet.

            that’s one of the funniest things I’ve read this year

            Is that a fact or an opinion? I’m gonna have to say that you are WRONG either way. I mean, do you read Kat’s posts?

            Oops….and I just said I was going to try to stop doing that.

            LOL
            😉

          4. Satirical Provocation
            [quote=Anonymous]Yeah, I’ve got to cut back on satirical provocation as a means for stimulating debate. Too many people just don’t get it. [/quote]

            Sorry, you can’t weasle out of a bad position with that nonsense. You put forth an opinion (that Aldous Huxley was a “freakin’ moron”). When other people offered their opinion that you were wrong, you then took them to task with a statement which actually (accidentally) took your own statement to task (“Funny how when someone hears something they don’t like they automatically assume the person who said it is ignorant, stupid or ‘just laughably wrong’.”) You were not attempting ‘satirical provocation’, as you then offered reasons to justify your position.

            Furthermore, my statement that you were “laughably wrong” wasn’t actually an opinion, it was a fact (as much as any fact could be). Looking for as respectable a source as I can, Britannica doesn’t in fact list Huxley as a “freakin’ moron” – instead he is labelled as being “chiefly remarkable for his acute and far-ranging intelligence, his graceful style”…and “one of the most witty and intelligent writers of his generation”.

            I asked whether you had actually read any of Huxley’s work, and you replied that you had and offered your opinion that “If you are a normal person, who actually lives, works and loves in the real world, then it just describes someone who never worked a real day in his life or lived among the real working class (the middle-class), and can’t differentiate (or accept) reality from utopian longing.” You obviously haven’t read enough Huxley, as his novel Antic Hay takes the knife to Bohemianism. You say you’ve read Brave New World, and yet it is the antithesis of Utopianism.

            You offered an opinion. You were laughably wrong, and hypocritical to boot. I would suggest admitting so, rather than retreating behind silly excuses such as “satirical provocation” and shifting the onus to those “who don’t get it”.

            Kind regards,
            Greg
            ——————————————-
            You monkeys only think you’re running things

          5. Response to “Anonymous”
            (1) You describe Huxley as “someone who never worked a real day in his life”

            Aldous Huxley was severely visually impaired, if not virtually blind, from the age of sixteen. What would you have him do to consider him a worker? He wrote 47 books as well as numerous essays and other literary works. That is real work. Writing and publishing one book in a lifetime is, in my opinion, exemplary, laudable and a demonstration of hard work.

            (2) “…or lived among the real working class (the middle-class).”

            The working class is the working class. The middle class is the middle class.

            (3) “And as such, just as open to debate (to the Left’s consternation).”

            What the gibbon from hades inspires you to think that the Left does not like debate?

    2. I’m curious…
      If Aldous Huxley is an (expletive deleted) moron, what sort of person do you regard as a genius? Or even as a mediocrity? I have to wonder which of his writings you’ve read to form so low an opinion of him.

      cheers

      Good News: There’s a guiding force at work in the Universe. Bad News: It’s Irony.

        1. Well, no, I don’t think so.
          For someone who thinks that his/her right to an opinion is being infringed upon by others, you seem in quite a rush to do the same to the opinion of others, although with less justification, as I see it.

          You made an inflammatory comment about a fellow held in some esteem by a fair number of people; you should expect some reaction. You introduce irrelevancies such as calling the reaction Leftist-in comparison to what, the Right’s evenhanded reaction to any criticism?-and that does rather look a bit disingenuous. Then you make comments that are simply wrong and it doesn’t much help your position, for example alluding to Huxley as “someone who never worked a real day in his life”…well, you’ll have to forgive me for saying that it looks like you have little grasp of his writing or of how large and diverse his body of work is if you can say such a thing. And by the way, what does Huxley’s use of psychedelic drugs have to do with the literary merit of his work? Is the worth of his work related to how stoned he was when he wrote it? Do you judge authors on the basis of their life-style? I wonder how much literature we’d lose if we dumped every author who was excessively fond of booze? Do we lose the work of someone like Samuel Taylor Coleridge because he liked narcotic drugs?

          Nobody has tried to stifle your right to self-expression, certainly not Greg, whose simplest course would have been to nuke your post if he genuinely wanted to conduct an assault on your right to freedom of expression. It is no defence of free speech to claim that one’s right to free speech exempts one from criticism, not when your opinion appears to be on shaky ground at best.

          Of course, that’s just my opinion.

          cheers

          Good News: There’s a guiding force at work in the Universe. Bad News: It’s Irony.

          1. “For someone who thinks that
            “For someone who thinks that his/her right to an opinion is being infringed upon by others,”

            “Nobody has tried to stifle your right to self-expression, certainly not Greg”

            And I never said anything like that.

            “You made an inflammatory comment about a fellow held in some esteem by a fair number of people; you should expect some reaction. You introduce irrelevancies such as calling the reaction Leftist-in comparison to what, the Right’s evenhanded reaction to any criticism?-and that does rather look a bit disingenuous.”

            As a conservative, I listen to the most outrageous, hateful and fallacious things said about people I admire everyday, so I certainly don’t need to listen to the indignation of liberals who can’t stand to have their icons criticized. A simple “I don’t agree, and here’s why…” would’ve sufficed. I’m open to having my mind changed, or my attempts at satirical criticism tempered (but in Huxley’s case, I know more than enough about him to stand by my opinion of him). But I do reserve the right to challenge anyone who says that my “opinion” is wrong. I mean, if you are going to try to make a point that my opinion is “wrong”, you should come up with something better than “because MY opinion is right”. And thanks for sharing yours.

          2. Have you heard of The Law of Holes?
            It states: When the hole is deep enough, stop digging.
            Believe me, the hole you’re in is deep enough.

            cheers

            Good News: There’s a guiding force at work in the Universe. Bad News: It’s Irony.

    3. That artical is Old about sunspots.
      It was written during the height the the solar cycle! I’v noticed it circulating around the news net in the last 2 weeks. Seems the global warning smear team is working hard.

      And please tell me what strange behavior do you allude too by Al Gore?

      And just sayin ‘ Aldous Huxley is anything but a moron.

  2. Sun spots causing spots before editors’ eyes?
    Oy! I don’t know whether The Anomalist dug up that BBC sun spot article themselves or just found a link posted by someone else who unearthed it, but by now, somebody should have noticed that the article was published on Tuesday, 6 July, 2004.

    Kat

    1. Oi yourself
      Got it from Livescience. That’s what happens when you cover for someone else’s news. 😉

      Besides, it’s just as pertinent now as it was 3 years ago. And it allowed me to plug Sunshine.

    2. It was noticed. And it still
      It was noticed. And it still might explain Al Gore’s strange behavior over the last several years. LOL

      Some of you people really need to develop a sense of humor.

      The other point was an allusion to the scienctific evidence that the sun has a far greater effect on our weather than does any other variable. Hence, changes we are currently seeing in Mars and Jupiter, as well as the global cooling we saw from 1940-1970.

      (I know I’m a terrible heretic for daring to challenge group-think of the global warming brown shirts.)

  3. Deteriorating Tombs
    Surely the solution to this is to build a large high brick / stone wall around all monuments and charge a large entry fee. Restricting access to the only true descendants of the pharaohs is the way ahead.

    Why not appoint the direct descendant of the Gods, Zahiamunraseti the Hat to speak on behalf of all to instruct the world in their errors and omissions. Remove the tourists and make more high quality truthful documentaries showing discoveries of fish bones and bread tins, and charge all universities an annual fee to study anything Egyptian. Any researcher with a new theory should pay a large fee for having a different theory to the Great one with hat.

    If all else fails, then the great Zahiamunraseti the Hat can walk on water, feed the masses and purge the world of all infidels. After all his ancestors were the ones that originally did all these things and other religions just copied it years later.

    AAiek

  4. Remembering Vonnegut
    That link above is to a members only page, so here’s one that’s a bit more open-arms and free-minded befitting the man it praises:

    For countless teenagers, reading Vonnegut was as much an entry into adult life as your first beer. The world became funnier, more dangerous, more exciting. If you were looking to send up authority, question life’s meaning or face the worst and keep your sense of humor, Vonnegut was your teacher.

    Novelist Jess Walter, also a National Book Award finalist last fall, recalled working on his nominated book “The Zero,” a Sept. 11 story “with satire about our culture.” Walter would joke that he wore a wristband that read, “WWVD _ What Would Vonnegut Do.”

    “I became a writer because of him,” said Walter, 41. “It was his compassion, humanism and great humor in the face of 20th century horrors that made me realize all that a writer could do. He was deceptively simple and because readers discovered him when they were young, they sometimes made the mistake of dismissing him later, but what he was doing was so complex, so difficult.”

    Kalfus, too, found that Vonnegut was an author who stayed with you long after you thought you had outgrown him. You don’t have to be young to appreciate that “we are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful what we pretend to be” or agree that “laughter and tears are both responses to frustration and exhaustion.”


    [ Writers Praise Kurt Vonnegut – washingtonpost.com ]

    ‘course, he was no Huxley, but then, who is? and vice versa.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mobile menu - fractal