Click here to support the Daily Grail for as little as $US1 per month on Patreon

News Briefs 11-11-2004

From ancient death rituals to futuristic spaceplanes all in one list. Only TDG News can do this – we refresh the parts other news sites don’t reach.

  • An inventor is attempting to re-create daVinci’s “impossible machine”, which he says was a robot.
  • The president of a creation apologetics group says the dwarf skeleton of Homo Floresiensis may confound evolutionists, but it is easy for creationists to explain.
  • The same group have a comment on the recent National Geographic special on evolution vs creationism (as reported by Greg a couple of weeks ago). Here is a possible solution to the controversy!
  • A recent report for the U.S. Air Force on teleportation has been criticised by sceptical scientists.
  • Boeing and Northrop Grumman are to collaborate on a design for the space shuttle’s replacement.
  • A spacecraft propelled by a solar sail will be launched in March of 2005.
  • New excavations at Qumran help to explode the myth that the Essenes wrote the Dead Sea Scrolls.
  • The latest installment of the BBC’s “Planet Under Pressure” wonders whether we can meet our energy needs without destroying the planet. Particularly horrific is the Chinese environmental abuse.
  • Mining the Moon is the gateway to Mars, says a group of specialists.
  • A 13th Dynasty wooden coffin has been unearthed in Luxor.
  • How do you clean depleted uranium up from a battlefield? Tumbleweed, of course.
  • It’s the 25th anniversary of a notorious Scottish alien abduction attempt.
  • Secret German cult in Chile breaks 43-year spell to reveal it’s secrets at long last.
  • The X-34 hypersonic scramjet is to get it’s last public appearance now that it has been handed to DARPA.
  • An example of how politics has muddied the global warming debate as one faction critisizes another faction for saying that global warming is an anti-US conspiracy by Europe.
  • How coping with the forces of darkness can shape your office or business.
  • Scientists have long pondered the hows and whys of physical attraction, but I think they don’t really have a clue.
  • Does Utah have it’s own Area 51? If it did, would the Pentagon admit it to a news reporter?
  • I had to look twice at this website for the University of Birmingham, UK’s new Cryptozoology Dept.
  • The architect who used automatic writing to guide restoration of a historic church and was then written out of it’s history himself.
  • Now heres the kind of moral value I could back – France introduces chemical castration for sex offenders.
  • Questioning orthodox opinions about the neolithic cult of the head.
  • The Maori hunted the Giant Moa, a huge flightless bird, to extinction – but it may have been dying out anyway.
  • Way back in 1981, the Chinese publication “Nature Journal” reported well documented instances of children teleporting objects several metres.
  • Changed weather patterns mean some Australian cities may run out of water, but as long as they don’t run out of beer, no worries.
  • An influential moderate muslim argues that the West and the Internet are the battlefields where the struggle to modernise and democratise Islamic societies will be fought.

Quote of the Day:


A tyrant must put on the appearance of uncommon devotion to religion. Subjects are less apprehensive of illegal treatment from a ruler whom they consider god-fearing and pious. On the other hand, they do less easily move against him, believing that he has the gods on his side.



Aristotle

  1. da vinci
    Did anyone in Oz see Kath and Kim tonight?
    Kath said she is reading the abridged version of The da Vinci Code.
    It is called the eensie weensie vinci code.

    I loved the story of the Scottish sighting of the UFO.It is so strange that one wonders how someone could make up something like that and go public about it.
    This is the type of sighting that I always believe is true.

    shadows

  2. A tyrant must put on the appe
    A tyrant must put on the appearance of uncommon devotion to religion. Subjects are less apprehensive of illegal treatment from a ruler whom they consider god-fearing and pious. On the other hand, they do less easily move against him, believing that he has the gods on his side.

    Aristotle

    This is a great quote, immediately made me think of Saddam Hussein.

    Thrustbucket

      1. Deja vu all over again
        W has not joined a congregation in DC. This man is not religious whatsoever. The cult of personality mixed with faux devotion is what W is.If and when people recognize just what he is, his bubble will burst. How would we know the good without the bad? Create peace, Dennis

          1. Hi Oscar
            Hi Oscar,

            Dont you think you should sign the vitriolic ones too? I begin to seriously doubt the veracity of your tales.

            Regards, C

        1. Actually I knew the quote was
          Actually I knew the quote was placed their because the placer obviously had W in mind, I was being fecicious.

          I love hearing the banter about W’s religious convictions leading the country to hell, its more entertaining than the Saturday night movie on TNN

          Thrustbucket

          1. sad
            Hi Thrust,
            That’s rather a sad way to get your kicks don’t you think?
            Because your country is going to ruin, and shortly you will see just where the religious nuts are going to take you.
            But you don’t have to take my word for it, the proof of the pudding is in the eating and you will be eating the pudding soon enough.
            If that is the quote from Aristotle then I must admit I didn’t think it was aimed at anyone.
            There had been discussion in this forum about religious agenda and I thought it was just further to that.

            shadows

          2. Just goes to prove
            Hi Thrust,

            Just goes to prove you don’t know me as well as you think you do. Shadows in his post is right. The quote was intended as a continuance of my post on yesterdays news, that I loathe fundies of all types and descriptions (including the very rare Pagan ones like Carlyon). When I decided to post it, I thought of bin Laden, Bush, the Iranian Islamic Council, Hitler, the Taliban, Musharraf of Pakistan, several Israeli politicos, Margaret Thatcher and dozens of others. I am actually far more open minded than you give me credit for. If you could see my favourites list under the “General Opinion” folder you would see Mich News, Capitalism Magazine and the Command Centre (all “right”) as well as AlterNet, Information Clearing House and Common Dreams (all “leftie”).
            I dont come from the US and don’t intend to stay forever, remember? I have no vested interest in your system and think for myself.
            Regards, C

          1. wrath of grapes
            Although it states Democrat on my registration card, I will answer your question.

            I have liked several Republican politicians: Mark Hatfield of Oregon was one of my favorites, because he supported the Nuclear Free Zone (NFZ) movement in the United States and was an antiwar activist. But he represented a liberal wing of the Republican party (the Ripon Society/Rockefeller Republicans) which is fading into obscurity.

            I would support any Republican like Hatfield who was active in the peace & justice movement, but unfortunately there are not many anymore.

            I think in the 1860’s I would have voted Republican, as they were the abolitionist party, and the Democrats were proslavery. Unfortunately, today, Democrats seem to be in the forefront of advancing civil rights and Republicans in the South seem to want to refight the Civil War.

            I disagree with a number of Democrats, including any that refuse to repudiate Louis Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam as black leaders. Malcolm X left the NOI in 1964 to found a more universalist, less racist organization, and they killed him for it. Meanwhile they continue to proclaim Jews were the main agents behind the slave trade.

            There are a number of races in which I have voted for third party candidates, including Greens and Libertarians. In many local races I have preferred the Republican to the Democrat.

            I deeply disagree with Democrats like even my co-ethnic Joseph Lieberman who feel it is the government’s job to protect children from arts, music, and entertainment through prior restraint and censorship.

            So my party registration does not drain me of independent thought. And, frankly, given the kinds of Democrats who are in office these days (such as the now gone off the deep end Ed Koch), I’m starting to rethink that.

            Steven Mizrach
            Academic, Pop Culture Junkie, Grail Recycler

          2. Registration Card
            Lokk I hva no idea about the workings over in the USofA so I have the following Question.
            What is this registration card? I have heard the term more than once so just curious

            Electricmonk

          3. What is this registration card?
            At age 18, one can register to vote. Each state has a varying number of ‘counties’ (which in Louisiana only, they call ‘parishes’), and each county has a number of voting ‘precincts’. The precinct where you vote is determined by where you live, i.e. your actual street address. Your name is added to the voter roles in your precinct.

            So to register to vote, you fill out a ‘voter registration form’ with your name and address — and party affiliation, if any. You’re also allowed to register as an ‘independent’. Then the county where you register sends you your official ‘voter registration card’ which has your name, the precinct you’re to vote in, your party affiliation, etc.

            One’s party affiliation can be important for several reasons, but here’s a big one. Since any particular political party may have more than one person who is seeking to become that party’s candidate for a particular office, that party has a ‘primary election’ before the main election to choose which person will be the party’s official nominee for the office. In most states, only people who have registered as members of that party are allowed to vote in this ‘primary’.

          4. What is this registration card?
            so, if you say you are a Democrat then you are a member of the party? Surely not? Surely there are properly paid up, card carrying members of US political parties, and surely they make decisions on candidates etc? Can anyone just announce that they are Republican and then have a say in that party’s decisions? What a curious system!

          5. What a curious system!
            Yep, you got it. We just ‘announce’ which party we’re for. For instance, here’s California’s online voter registration form. Note the section on political parties.

            The political parties are organized from the local level up. Take a look at Florida’s local Republican organization: Florida Republican Counties. Escambia County [Florida] Republicans’ Local Committees are composed of just local folks who possibly volunteered because they had the money, time, and interest to do what was needed.

            Parties also have state organizations. From two states you may have read about recently:
            Republican Party of Florida
            Ohio Democratic Party

            Smaller parties like the Libertarians would obviously have fewer local organizations, since they have fewer members. But even the small parties have local groups: Libertarian Party of Boulder County.

            How does it work where you live?

          6. Voting in Australia
            As said above, I too think it a strange system but then again it is one that I have not grown up with. Here in Australia when you turn 18 you have to vote or receive a $50 fine. When there is an election you go to the nominated voting station and get ticked off the election roll. After that it is up to you wether you vote Mickey Mouse or make a serious contribution. The structure of the political party is sorted out by the party’s members or the party leader. We have a few smaller but it will always be either Liberal or Labour who get to be in power. The votes for smaller parties or independents usually end up deferred to either of the two major parties. One change I would really like to see is “Parliamentary Privilege” taken away. With this Politicians can say whatever they want at a cabinet meeting even if it isn’t true and get away with it. I would also love it if when a politician makes a promise or says something is going to happen and it doesn’t gets fined or at least has to face some retribution.

            Electricmonk

          7. strange system
            Hi Electricmonk,
            I agree that the Australian system of voting leaves a lot to be desired.
            In Qld we were stuck with the gerrymander for years; put there by a Labor government and finally removed by one.
            And preferential voting stinks.
            I can hardly ever find any single person I would like to vote for, let alone give preferences to.
            You are right on the ball with the lies politicians tell too.And they’re all as bad as each other.

            shadows

      1. Clintons posing as religious fanatics?
        I fail to see the relationship here. Granted, the Clintons must, like most, have had their lows. On the other hand and correct me if I err, they never posed as born again or used religion or god as a shield to actions that would otherwise be anti-Christian in philosohy unless you were a Puritan.

        This statement sounds more like score settling since it has no relevance.

        Did you leave that party or were you cut off?

    1. funny you should say that
      Saddam never was a very devout Moslem and in fact only started wearing the trappings of devotion right around the First Gulf War.

      The Ba’ath Party in Iraq was a militantly secular Arab nationalist party, emphasizing Sunni Arab culture and progressive reform over Islam.

      Under the Ba’athists, Iraq actually allowed women to get an education, legalized abortion, and allowed women to remove the burqa’a.

      This is why, BTW, for a very long time Hussein was on Osama bin Laden’s fatwa list. Perhaps not unlike here in the U.S., secularists do not like the Islamists. This is also why the PFLP (Marxist Popular Front) and Hezbollah never cooperated, either.

      So yes, I would agree with the comment that he was a tyrant who hid behind false religiosity, He started reading from the Quran and started talking about jihad around 1991 because it was a good way to pacify the Shi’ite minority in Iraq and unify them against the Americans.

      But the truth was, he never was much of a Moslem, and his party never had much to do with the radical Islamic fundamentalist groups, who despised him in turn.

      Steven Mizrach
      Academic, Pop Culture Junkie, Grail Recycler

  3. Evolution vs Creation
    Regarding this article and these issues….

    I am really kind of depressed to see that after all these years of ‘open minded thought’ neither side seems to be willing to concede a little and maybe try and figure out how the ‘truth’ lies somewhere inbetween. Why is each side of the debate so polarized? Why does truth have to fall into an extreme?
    Sadly it’s kind of a symbolic parrallel between Conservatives and Liberals or Dems and Repubs. When are people going to wake up and see that neither side has the truth?

    A powerful shirtless musclebound man, sitting on his throne in the clouds did not create everything. Furthermore, everything, especialy life, did not simply spring forth by random arrangements in a chaotic universe of elements. The truth is something else! Maybe people need to start exploring other possibilities?

    Thrustbucket

    1. the excluded middle
      I agree with your comments, Thrustbucket, in the end ideological tunnel vision often presents us from seeing the “excluded mdidle” of reality.

      I am a huge fan of Robert Anton Wilson’s, and he repeatedly makes this point. Whatever your reality tunnel, if you don’t look at the world with new eyes occasionally, you are missing the whole story. Maybe UFOs are not alien spacecraft and maybe they also are not all hoaxes/fakes/natural phenomena. Why are other possibilities besides these two extremes never discussed? Maybe Democrats aren’t always right and Republicans aren’t always wrong, or the other way around.

      I do not think the political spectrum is unidimensional; in fact an Utne Reader article once suggested it’s far better to look at politics as a Cartesian plane than a single left-to-right line. So, on certain things, for example, Jameske and I are far closer than other people, whereas on others, we are further apart.

      So, on the creation vs. evolution debate, here’s my 2c.

      1. If we’re going to teach the Genesis creation myth as science, we should also teach other creation myths as science. I believe students should be equally exposed to the creation narratives found in the Hindu Vedas, the Popul Vuh, and the Babylonian texts from which Genesis draws upon.

      2. Oddly, I do not remember Michelangelo or anybody else ever depicting Yhvh as shirtless and musclebound. For some odd reason, a picture flashed in my head of Arnold Schwarzenegger arranging the planets. Now I know why the asteroid belt is there…

      3. I agree with your basic point – I think evolution is correct in that the universe evolves and so do living organisms. That said, the current dogmatic position on the mechanisms governing that evolution is not necessarily tenable. That all mutations are random and that all evolution results from natural selection plus blind chance ignores the apparent facts that the genetic code is an informational system and as such follows “morphogenetic” and mathematical laws of form and function. The genetic code is a reflexive, self-organizing system.

      The real puzzle of evolution is that organisms are more adaptable biologically than they need to be, and that is a curious thing, if the “watchmaker” is blind.

      Steven Mizrach
      Academic, Pop Culture Junkie, Grail Recycler

  4. Anti-US Enviromentalism
    Generic claims may sound crazy but when you look closer at specific issues like the US refusing to sign the Kyoto ageement it isn’t. The US already has a domestic program almost identical to the Kyoto agreement. All signing the Kyoto agreement would do is force the US to bribe post-industrial countries like Russia for pollution credits.

    Read some of this commentary for more info:

    http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=128827&threshold=5&mode=thread&commentsort=1&op=Change

  5. China’s environmental crisis
    I’m considering teaching english in China next year, and environment is a big factor in determining my decision. I suffer allergies and sinus problems, so the last thing I want is to live in a heavily polluted environment.

    I’ve been doing my research and my gods has the Chinese landscape been raped and tortured and abused beyond recognition. It’s a county bigger than Europe, yet it has fewer trees!

    There’s a satellite image of the world’s pollution hotspots, and the darker colours represent extreme pollution — the entire northeast of China is the darkest colour possible.

    It’s frustrating when I hear everyone constantly gripe about America’s environmental crimes — yet here’s China, and nobody is speaking out about it. Even worse, the Chinese people don’t get a voice, enslaved under the yoke of beaurocratic communism. Mao did irrepairable damage, and that beautiful culture of the Orient that existed for thousands of years will never recover in my mind.

    I think I won’t go to China. Considering how opinionated I can be, I’ll probably get deported!

    Rick

    1. China
      Hi Rick,
      I have known people teaching English in China, South Korea and Japan.
      The couple in China were sent to a tiny village in the far north of the country, where there was no running water and the families kept their pigs in the houses with them because of the cold.
      The food was appalling and they were doled out a litre of water each a day for drinking and bathing.
      They loved the people and children but hated the conditions and couldn’t wait until their contract ran out.
      The one in SK is also unhappy,hates the cold but loves the kids.
      The ones who went to Japan probably fared the best and stayed 8 years and made lots of friends. However the woman found the attitude to women from the Japanese men to be over-bearing and humiliating.
      I guess we are all used to our own cultures.
      On the environmental front, yes, China is right up there with unequalled environmental damage,except for India where the big corporations and IMF are interfering in the country but at least we know about it.
      No one knows about what happens in China, except for the huge new dam on the Yellow River which has caused massive loss of live and ecology.
      I don’t think any of those countries would suit you with allergy problems.
      Also, worse than being deported would be having to stay and fulfill your contract.
      Good luck anyway, whatever you decide to do.

      shadows

      1. Turning Japanese-ah
        Shadows,

        Funnily enough, my first choice was Japan. However, I turned 31 last July, so I no longer qualify for a working visa (you have to be 30 or younger). I was devastated, I had my heart on teaching in Japan next year. It’s more frustrating considering that a few weeks before I turned 31, I went to the organisation to apply, but they said to wait until September. Turns out I could have applied back then, I was given the wrong information — and I would have qualified because I was 30 years old at the time of application, despite turning 31 a few weeks later. I felt like I had been shot when someone told me about the mistake. I also don’t have a Bachelor’s degree, I only have an Associate Diploma, so I can’t apply for full-time teaching work in Japan.

        I’d love to visit China, but I don’t feel 100% right about living and working there like I do Japan.

        Oh well, these things happen for a reason eh? I just have to keep walking my path and good things will happen.

        1. working visa
          Hi Rico,
          I didn’t know that about the age limit for a working visa for Japan.What a disappointment for you!.
          Personally, if I was young again and had an option open to me to work in one of these countries, I would go to China.
          It would be hard toughing it out for a year, but you would learn a lot of the language and a lot of the culture.
          In years to come a knowledge of Chinese culture and history and all the languages is going to be worth a lot to whoever has it.
          China is the next super-power on the way up.
          South Korea obviously does not have an age limit as my friend there is nearly 50 and has been there for 3 years.
          Also, just a personal thing, but I much prefer the Chinese people to the Japanese people.

          shadows

  6. published by mistake
    A recent report for the U.S. Air Force on teleportation has been criticised by “sceptical scientists”. –

    – the scientists are always skeptical (it’s caused by conventional mathematics) i glanced the doc and – decided not to save it for futher refference.

    section you don’t like: ?teleportation … from my past experiences what did it take ?yes

    love(agree) everything as no need to change anything — so when you fool yourself into that – make a whish and the system that you just accepted ? responses the same … well somewhat so i whished to fly and it was then a question of accepting that exactly (so i gess much the same 1 can messup with surrounding time and space..)

    .. anyways the question here is how to teleport mathematically – if there’s math support theres social use for this – otherwise u’d play the god for a while.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mobile menu - fractal