Click here to support the Daily Grail for as little as $US1 per month on Patreon

News Briefs 11-10-2004

There are lots of monkey references in today’s news briefs — apes, gorillas, bigfoots (or bigfeet?). Peel yourself a banana and enjoy …

  • A potentially new species of ape has been discovered in the Congo. This is actually the same news reported several months ago.
  • Chinese film-makers witness three Yeren (the Chinese Yeti/Bigfoot) in Shennongjia Forest. This is frustrating — an entire FILM CREW witnesses three yeti, but NO ONE thinks to use their cameras and film them!
  • This isn’t the first sighting of the elusive Yeren. You can read more about them here.
  • Scientists drill holes at the discovery site of Peking Man, searching for evidence of early humans.
  • Ancient Greeks may have used advanced technology to lower limestone coffins, one weighing 3.3 tonnes.
  • Ancient hill-mound tombs of Macedonia. Egypt, South America, China … and now Greece/Macedonia.
  • Mexican Govt approves the construction of a Wal-Mart at Teotihuacan. I don’t know why people are surprised, there’s been a KFC at Giza, Egypt for years.
  • The long road to restoring Iraq’s National Museum in Baghdad. Perhaps Dubya will approve replacing it with KFC.
  • South Korean troops help restore an ancient castle in Iraq.
  • Can mathematics aid the fight against terrorism? Yes, it’d definitely help if Dubya could count.
  • Denmark is attempting to claim the North Pole, because thinning ice sheets are making oil more accessible. I hope Iorek Byrnison bites their behinds.
  • Russia’s commitment to the Kyoto Protocol may just be the beginning.
  • Coral Reefs could get electro-shock treatment to encourage regrowth. Hundreds of unemployed electric eels apply.
  • Nobel Peace Laureate claims HIV deliberately created. I personally believe it’s possible HIV was created in a lab, but I think it’s highly irresponsible to claim it’s a conspiracy against black people. A lack of education (and in many cases, the wrong education, such as Catholic Missionaries preaching condoms are a sin — this is contributing to unsafe sex and the spread of the HIV virus), poverty, and the disinterest of wealthy nations (not just the West, but the East also), are what’s helping the HIV virus’s murder spree in Africa.
  • Here’s some information on Africa’s AIDS crisis, and this is what Irish rock group U2’s Bono has to say. Am I bugging you? Sorry, I didn’t mean to bug ya.
  • Here’s a great article asking if GM crops will help or hurt us.
  • The Lawton crop circle is not a fake, according to researchers.
  • Why are UFO sightings on the rise in India? Warning: this article has blatant patriotic propaganda! Also, someone needs to tell the reporters about Vimanas
  • An example of a petty, narrow-minded archaeologist.
  • A new age of aviation, as space tourism hots up. I love the Japan Times’ motto: All The News Without Fear or Favor.
  • A NASA employee falsified safety check reports. That’s comforting news to the families of the crew of the Space Shuttle Columbia.
  • You have to be quick (and willing to be in Siberia, China, Japan or Western Alaska) to catch this solar ecplise that will end before it begins.
  • Scientists determine that ghost particles which fill empty space would be sucked into Black Holes, leaving space empty.
  • Water once flowed through the Martian Hills.
  • Maryland towns jealously tell Salem that they had witches too. Salem gets all the attention.
  • Yar me mateys, could this be the remains of Blackbeard’s ship? I’ll draw the map to the treasure on this here cracker and give it to Polly for safe-keeping.

Quote of the Day:

It is a superstition of modern thought that the march of knowledge has always been linear.

Shri Aurobindo Ghosh (1872-1950)

  1. Bigfeet heheheh
    Hi Rico, good stuff.
    I wish scientists would make up their minds about black holes and empty space.
    I am sure the last I heard on the subject was that scientists suspect that black holes do not exist,and that there is heaps of stuff floating around there in space….even life.
    Not that I know anything about the subject, because I don’t.
    But it is a perfect example of science expecting people like me to believe everything they think/imagine/hope/suspect but never prove.

    It is also the case with Vikings in America, or anywhere for that matter.Scientists should be wary of making statements that it could not have happened.
    Just because they cannot find evidence of something does not mean it did not happen.

    shadows

    1. Space, the final frontier
      Thanks Shadows,

      I strongly believe that we won’t know anything about space until we actually go out there, further than we’ve been before. Satellites that have been to the reaches of our solar system and beyond have given us data that supports and contradicts and confuses — reality says scientists really don’t know and can only hazard guesses. Some of them are good guesses, but at the end of the day I’d like them to admit that, hey, we just don’t know.

      Then again, it’s the challenge of the puzzle that drives these scientists.

      Rico

  2. Mr. Clean
    I’m probably going to take some flak for this, but I’ve always suspected that HIV was created on purpose. However, I don’t believe that the target was blacks, exclusively; many blacks just happen to fit the profile a bit more closely, especially in areas with a high rate of poverty and/or poor education. I think the target was humans who live a promiscuous or addictive lifestyle. What the creators of HIV didn’t anticipate was the possiblility of innocent exposure, like blood transfusions, exposure during medical procedures and first aid, and so forth. Or, maybe they did, and considered it “collateral damage”.

    If the above isn’t true, then I have to believe that Gaia, or Mother Earth, now regards us as a viral-type threat, and is mustering up some tough “antibodies” to reduce our population to a less threatening number.

    Regards,
    khefre

    “The earth we abuse and the living things we kill will, in the end, take their revenge; for in exploiting their presence we are diminishing our future.” Marya Mannes

    1. The Georgia Guidestones and The Lucis Trust
      Dear Khefre, You might very well be right, mother earth has had just about enough foolishness from humans. Several years ago there was an article on The Georgia Guidestones which then led me to finding out about The Lucis Trust. Oh, and it gets wierder the more one uncovers, like a definite agenda. New World Order type stuff. Anyway, good post, just reminded me of this article http://afgen.com/populat34.html Thanks, Pam —————————–Truth is stranger than fiction.

        1. More Scrutiny Required?
          Hi khefre, pam and thereisno,

          I decided to do a bit of digging around the link pam gave, and noticed that it’s main source was a book called “Killer Angel”, written by a fundementalist Christian teacher (hardly someone with no axe to grind) and published by “Radio Liberty”. This is not Radio Free Europe, folks, but a Christian fundementalist talk radio show from California. The sites pages include such gems as:

        2. More detail on “America’s Stonehenge” and the nefarious purpose it is said to be put to.
        3. The ways that the BBC are using Teletubbies to teach occultism and paganism to your kiddies.
        4. The revelation that the Peace symbol is anti-christian along with other occultist symbolism a good Christian should be wary of.

          Theres more fun there too. However, on reflection I am not sure I count these people as credible. They might be right about Teletubbies though…

          Warm regards, C

          1. Slowly I turn…
            I went over the site myself during a break in the action this afternoon (after all, my boss requires that I at least appear like I’m working), with much the same conclusion. Two of Dr. Monteith’s key points seem to be to buy his stuff. K-ching! The third is for everyone to get involved with government: (of the people, by the people, for the people – isn’t that the way it’s supposed to be?). Point number four leads us in a fundamental Christian direction. I guess if we all became fundamental Christian monogamous heterosexual subsistence farmers, our problems would be over. His remarks about the harmless nature of DDT border on the insane. Tell you what, Doc; I’ll come over to your house and spray that crap all over your vegetables for a decade or two, and then we’ll see if your allegations are true. Dioxin isn’t a carcinogen, either, I suppose.

            I also reviewed the “American Stonehenge”, that allegedly nefarious occultic megalith of the Dark Side, and found it to contain good, sound advice for any civilization that wants to live past a couple of thousand years. Dr. Monteith seems to attribute the original Stonehenge to the Druids, and bills it as a place of the occult. While it is fairly certain that pagan rites occurred there, and still do, there’s no documented connection to the Druids or any other “occult” group or religion having built it. As far as I am aware, we don’t have a clue exactly who built it, or why. Or how. Or maybe not even when.

            Last month I visited a fundamental Christian site that had examples of every known religious symbol on display, all billed as “marks of the devil – Satan worshipers”. I was frankly surprised not to see STOP and YIELD signs in there too – they had everything else covered!

            Regards,
            khefre

            “Jed, we’re in amongst a bunch of nuts!” Granny Clampett

          2. Interesting stuff
            I found all of the above very interesting indeed, but as I always say that it is in the perspective.
            Anti-Christian does not mean pro-occult.
            Pam, you are the best poster of interesting stuff I have ever seen.
            Onya mate.

            shadows

          3. Evil DDT
            Hi Kherfe,

            DDT was/is relatively harmless to humans, but it killed insects deader than dirt – including malaria-carrying mosquitoes. The National Academy of Sciences stated, “To only a few chemicals does man owe as great a debt as to DDT… In little more than two decades, DDT has prevented 500 million human deaths, due to malaria, that otherwise would have been inevitable.”

            No human death or cancer has ever been attributed to DDT; humans were not the subject of the ban. The concern was accumulation of the chemical in the soil that would poison insects, and in turn, poison birds and other wildlife. A runaway chain-reaction was predicted in a book called Silent Spring by Rachel Carson. Carson, a marine biologist, claimed to have run experiments demonstrating birth defects and egg shell-thinning in quail. Her research was later refuted under oath by her own researchers. But Carson became the symbolic leader of a new movement – environmental activism.

            William Ruckelshaus was named head of the EPA by President Carter. The ban on DDT was a political statement meant to demonstrate the power of the new agency. Extensive hearings on DDT before an EPA administrative law judge occurred in the early ’70s. The EPA hearing examiner, Judge Edmund Sweeney, concluded that “DDT is not a carcinogenic hazard to man… DDT is not a mutagenic or teratogenic hazard to man… The use of DDT under the regulations involved here do not have a deleterious effect on freshwater fish, estuarine organisms, wild birds or other wildlife.”

            Ruckelshaus never attended a single hour of the seven months of EPA hearings on DDT, but he banned DDT in 1972. Ruckelshaus then refused to release materials upon which his ban was based. Ruckelshaus rebuffed USDA efforts to obtain those materials through the Freedom of Information Act, claiming that they were just “internal memos.” Scientists were therefore prevented from refuting the false allegations in the Ruckelshaus’ “Opinion and Order on DDT.”

            DDT was the victim of Junk Science and politics. The 1972 ban is estimated to have caused the death of millions in South America.

            Bill

          4. DDT Worldwide
            I don’t have any special axe to grind, nor do I consider myself a “tree-hugger”, but I have to wonder why the ban on DDT, now 32 years old, hasn’t been repealed around the world. I visited the following site to get some information – it’s pretty detailed, even listing a number of countries that still use it, along with the countries that have banned it and the years it was banned.

            http://www.pan-uk.org/pestnews/actives/ddt.htm

            Unless the entire entry for this pesticide and/or all the sources quoted are garbage, there’s more here than meets the eye. As for its effectiveness, my research finds that figure to be remarkable. However, insect resistance development is very rapid, and the chemical itself is persistent in the environment, allegedly posing a deadly hazard to marine life. I’m not a scientist, but it seems to me that somebody in the world would have stood up to the alleged political bullying if there was no substance to the “junk science” rap sheet on DDT.

            Regards,
            khefre

            “There must be no barriers for freedom of inquiry. There is no place for dogma in science. The scientist is free, and must be free to ask any question, to doubt any assertion, to seek for any evidence, to correct any errors.”
            Robert Oppenheimer

          5. DDT and Truth

            Hi Kherfe,

            Truth is not always well received; political correctness can become a force that restricts thinking. Data that challenges environmental issues is perceived as a threat to the environment and even a personal attack.

            DDT is bad and it was banned to protect the environment, right? Therefore, any information that supports DDT or contradicts the basic premise (DDT is bad) must be a threat to the environment as well. One doesn’t have to be a tree hugger to want to protect the environment. Even movie stars say DDT is bad, so it must be bad. Those that attack the environment are my enemy, right?

            The truth is, as I have stated, DDT was a victim of politics and Junk Science. In fact, it is the classic case. Herd mentality and bad press can be tough adversaries. The same is true of Global Warming but it is an even tougher opponent because there’s lots and lots of money involved. Many people that are absolutely certain that Global Warming is true haven’t the faintest clue what a runaway greenhouse effect is supposed to be; they just know it’s true. Some even think Global Warming has something to do with pollution other than CO2 or dirty water. Truth is, however, it doesn’t.

            Some of us do protest and expose these frauds, but our message is sometimes not well received. TDG challenges orthodox beliefs on all fronts. Sooner or later, we’re bound to hit some nerve that people hold dear, refute a truth that people are absolutely certain is true because they’ve always been told that their belief is true. It’s easy and fun when we show evidence that shreds someone else’s beliefs, but something that plays havoc with our own “truths” is not so much fun.

            Keep an open mind. Reading your response, I see that you do. :o)

            Bill

            Whenever you find that you are on the side of the majority, it is time to reform.

            Mark Twain

          6. Nothing but the truth?
            Bill,

            Good thoughts.

            Trying to define “truth” is like trying to nail jello to a tree. What mankind defines as true today, based on the best information at hand, might be proven ludicrous tomorrow. Whose “God” is the one, true God? For that matter, is there a God at all? No indisputable proof is forthcoming, yet people are killing each other over their “truth”. Man will always stumble over trying to force a popular (sensible or not) version of the truth on everyone else. Truth is not something you can “own” – it is natural principles manifested. You cannot break natural principles, you can only break yourself on them. When ever someone says “Listen to me; this is the absolute, indisputable truth..”, alarm bells start going off in my head.

            Animals in the wild survive by keying on sudden change; if the change proves non-threatening over time, it is then accepted as normal. I like to think I’m at least as smart as a wild animal, but there’s more to survival than that. In the “boiling frog” scenario, a frog is placed in a pot of water on the stove. If the temperature of the water is slowly raised, the frog will not sense danger, but become more lethargic and comfortable. By the time the water temperature becomes life-threatening, the frog is unable to climb out, and boils. If you’ve ever spent too much time in a hot tub, you will understand.

            Mankind needs to be aware of threatening change; not just rapid, easily detectable change, but the slow, insidious “boiling frog” kind, because that is where the main danger lies. Trends themselves may not be direct evidence of pending danger, but they need to be given credence in order for us to understand the natural cycles that govern our existence. To act rashly or to ignore evidence can result in the same result: oblivion. Read Edward Gibbon’s “History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire” to see how the “boiling frog” hypothesis applies to civilization, even one as sophisticated and advanced as the Roman Empire at its height. I’ll warrant that all, or most previous advanced civilizations on Earth (and there are probably many more than we know about) have fallen prey to the same slow grim reaper, perhaps realizing their peril too late to save themselves.

            As for ecological issues, the lunatic fringe wants to “save the planet”, with feel-good, knee-jerk policies. Here’s a news flash: we haven’t a prayer of destroying the planet, not even if we unleashed all the deadly and toxic forces at our command. What we would accomplish is to narrow the window of our own survival, possibly to the extinction level, along with plenty of “collateral damage”. The Earth would shake itself like a muddy dog, and begin again, letting evolution take its course, and maybe creating another dominant species with a bit more sense and less hostility toward the environment.

            So I’ll be from Missouri on conspiracy theories, global warming panic, pending ice ages, super volcanoes, mega-tsunamis, alien visitors, mothmen, killer asteroids, ad infinitum. I’ll entertain as many viewpoints as I can, digesting carefully, and adding my own opinions and intuition. Know what? In the absence of “truth” (there’s that word again), my result will be as good as anybody else’s on this Earth of ours.

            Regards,
            khefre

            “Those who are convinced they have a monopoly on The Truth always feel that they are only saving the world when they slaughter the heretics.”
            Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr.

          7. DDT and God
            Hi Kherfe,

            I think you’re expanding the definition of “truth” a little further than I had intended. Is DDT a dangerous carcinogenic hazard? Despite the popular assertion, we can show you scientific evidence that suggests that it is not. What would happen if you “come over to your house and spray that crap all over your vegetables for a decade or two”? We can show you evidence that you would be killing the garden pests without harming him in the least.

            As for the existence of God, we’ve offered no proof to either confirm or deny that assertion. But if any evidence surfaces, we’ll publish it – either way.

            Bill

          8. Evidence – and connections
            Hi Bill,

            In line with a subsequent comment, I used trichlor and other solvents as a technician for years, decades, actually, with no ill effects whatsoever. I also routinely cleaned out truck brake systems in the days of asbestos linings by spraying them with air, sans mask of any kind when I was in the army. Same deal – no lung problems. My friend’s mother is 94, and up until the price of smokes went off the scale, smoked three packs of non-filters a day. No emphysema, no lung cancer, no mouth or throat cancer, etc. She also ate bacon and eggs every morning, and yet has never been overweight, had cholesterol or triglyceride problems, gallstones, etc. Generalization can be a dangerous thing. There is no “one size fits all” in nature; that’s a construct of man, for his own economic and political benefit. There is probably a common meeting ground, which can be reached by open, sensible dialogue in place of dogmatic polarization.

            Instead of a DDT ban, perhaps we should give it a trial in a particularly needy location, and monitor the short and long-term effects on the entire ecosphere. If you believe that strongly in its benefit for mankind, then I submit your website reaches a lot of people. If enough consciousness is raised, the goal can be accomplished – that’s how the radical environmentalists got their agendas furthered. Circulate petitions, both online and hardcopy; write/phone/visit your governmental representation; speak with data – if you have indisputable evidence, use it to make your case. But I’m not the one you have to convince – it’s the establishment that’s in the way. If DDT is the harmless, most effective pesticide available, I have to wonder what possible reason, other than simple inertia, that has kept it banned for the past three decades.

            Regards,
            khefre

            “I think one’s feelings waste themselves in words; they ought all to be distilled into actions which bring results.”
            Florence Nightingale

          9. Minor correction
            Hi Bill,

            I’ve read much of this as well and agree that the story is held in the grip of PC. The minor correction is that William Ruckelshaus was named head of the EPA by Nixon. (Goes with the 1972 time frame.) I think Ruchelshaus was also in Carter’s administration: maybe FBI.

            Seperate anecdote: I know of a locomotive shop that existed in Delaware for 70-80 years where every worker WASHED their hands in open barrels of PCBs several times a day for their entire careers and apparently never suffered any ill effects. Go figure.

            X_O

    2. weird creatures
      the/this creator is against mans sucess
      the virus was ‘released’ cntrl-S-Afr … probably to get it going
      (backtraceing the purpose) ‘unbeatable’ bug does decr victims feel of confidence /usually mans organism developes method to fight disease, then remembers and populates this through many channels if tmo?! fails it’s because of it can’t decode the bug |such is promoted by many consiquences from mans social- and self- integrity (basicly concerns fighting spirit[or motivation 4] )| / thus – chemical treatment kills usually some of man extra to disease – as no solution but delaying the problem – so

      the basic reason is to show the man its place
      -related is to develope med industry
      –related is (chemical) control
      -? chemistry: … ? victims of pollution
      ? medicine men … : ??? to make you feel wrong as secure
      show place? — vision guiding as 4 herd
      _______________________
      bachelor

  3. Ghost particles / Black Holes?
    So, basically, the universe sucks?

    If this is true, we’ll all eventually be pulled into the cosmic drain and pop out on the other side, inside-out, yes? Holographically and virtually speaking, that is.

    Regards,
    khefre
    “There was a man in our town, and he was wondrous wise;
    He jumped into a bramble bush, and scratched out both his eyes.
    And when he saw what he had done, with all his might and main,
    He jumped back in the bramble bush and scratched them in again.”
    Mother Goose Rhyme, loosely translated

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mobile menu - fractal