Seceding From the Union: How do the International Bankers See This Idea?

SECEDING FROM THE UNION: HOW DO THE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS SEE THIS IDEA?

By Fahim A. Knight-El

I think the question of secession, is really not a new phenomenon, in particular in a state like Texas, which the question of seceding has been on and off the table for a very long time, but let me state right off the back, that I am an advocate of dissent and the constitutionality of their right to exercise their 1st Amendment, 9th Amendment and 10th Amendment right. Our Democracy, it gives us the right to dissent and I do not necessarily think that dissenting is a bad thing as long as it is within the legal guideline and laws of our nation. But I am also of the opinion that the secession movement speaks to how the question of race is still very much unresolved in the United States of America and unless we move beyond the superficial discussions of race; this discussion has to take place regardless of how painful it may be and who the historical culprits were and first admit slavery was criminal act—It must begin with an open apology from the United States Government and I do not mean no half-hearted conditional apology that the U.S. Congress issued a few years ago and we have to erase the white wash of the historical record of slavery and allow the naked truth to be presented unedited. Minister Louis Farrakhan and Nation of Islam's Historical Research Department published a second edition of their controversial book titled, "The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews" and no one has yet to take full responsibly for this 310 year tragedy (not even reparation would make us whole, although it would be justified).

I personally do not give a damn about the south losing the Civil War because African people were the booty of this war (these arguments overlook that there were over 100 million Africans that were unjustly brought to shores of the Americas during the Transatlantic Slave Trade and the Middle Passage). Let me give you just a little glimpse into their treatment, they were sold on auction blocks, divided from wives and children, flog and beaten to death if they showed any opposition or resistance, worked dusk to dawn; denied the ability to read and write, robbed of their culture, traditions, language, names, religion, denied the ability to show love and turned into 'Negroes' and most of all they instilled and imbedded self-hatred in which these practices became inculcated and systemic. If anyone and/or race of people who should be petitioning to seceding from the United States Government, it should be the so-called American Negro (African American, African, Black man, etc)—it was human suffering that was tied to the southern agriculture empires and created an aristocratic class of landlords at the expense of human suffering and dehumanization; this is why the Civil War was fought to diligently maintain the enormous economic interest of the white property owners. Farrakhan's book maintained that it was not just white interest, but Jewish interest; the book, "The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews", points out how cotton was the king of the cash crops in Mississippi and the southern black belt and these Robber Barons transitioned their enormous wealth into what became powerful banking houses in the United States and Europe.

These Confederates do not understand that unless they tackle the international bankers and Federal Reserve who is responsible for their misery and oppression nothing is ever going to change; it becomes hypocritical to think that seceding from the Union is the ultimate solution to resolving their political, economic and social problems and believing that if they secede this would somehow bring economic and social parity to their cause. It is not African Americans or Latinos that have put them in their social and political predicament (this is only a smokescreen), but the Rothschilds—who serve as the chief agitator and manipulator of race is for ever lurking as the Hidden Hand. They constantly feed poor whites and poor blacks a set of norms that is rooted in the history of American race relations, which has an objective of divide and rule. But the re-election of President Obama has exacerbated long standing historical tensions that are rooted in the American politics of race and the seceding rhetoric is the last resort of a dissatisfied sector in mainly old Confederate States. What amazes me is that States like Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, etc., based on per capita income and standard of living ranks as some of the poorest states in the United States, but racism blinds them when it comes to rationality and this often leads them to vote against their own interest. They think that it’s the black and brown problem that is ruining the civility of the United States and they fail to understand that the Dynastic families of Elitist gives them race as a distraction to keep their foot on their and our necks.

They are mere victims of controlled propaganda and even if there was a new Civil War, it would be in the political and economic interest of High Finance and not the interest of some red blooded Confederate who is advocating white American style patriotism. They do not have the guts or intestinal fortitude to declare war on the real slave drivers who sit on Wall Street and manipulate global suffering and has reduced many of these Confederate States down to a WalMart economy. Their impoverishment has been systematically orchestrated and they think the Money Emperors are going to somehow allow them reclaim the south. J.P. Morgan and the Harriman Brothers and the Rothschilds do not give a damn about southern racism and the secession movement, unless it starts to affect their bottom line (their motivation is always based on money and greed). Rothschild stated: "Let me issue and control a Nation's money, and I care not who makes its laws" --Amsel (Amschel) Bauer Mayer Rothschild, 1838

The International Bankers and Wall Street have lured them to sleep and at the sametime have outsourced American industries; many of these Confederate municipalities were the recipients of federal government stimulus money and if it wasn’t for government back incentives many of these States would have been bankrupt. For example, during the vice presidential debate do you recall when Joe Biden reminded Congressman Paul Ryan that he called Biden and submitted an application as a representative of Wisconsin asking for federal stimulus money—the textile economy, automobile industry and all forms of manufacturing have been outsourced to Mexico and South East Asia. Many of these southern Confederate States are right-to-work states where the workers rights are not protected by law and they labor at the pleasure of corporate industries. They ignorantly fight against workers unions (because the media dupes them into believing that to fight for workers rights and labor is to embrace communism and socialism) and most times they literally vote against their own interest. Many of the poor whites in these States have large percentages of whites on government assistance programs such as food stamps and welfare and if it was not for Medicaid they would not have medical care insurance. How do we alter this type of mindset or is the dumbing down process that is so overwhelming and this is an uphill challenge and battle? I am of the belief that change in America is not going to occur until we find better and strategic ways to change the thinking of the American people (I know it’s easier said than done)

The action of the secessionist ideology and movement and behavior quasi demonstrates that they do not fully believe in Democracy and the American Democratic process. I may not agree with some of President Barack Obama's policies, but he was duly elected by the people or may be I should say by the Cabal (I fully understand this variable, but I have to play the devil’s advocate). I do not think that if Mitt Romney would have won the presidential election; these States would not have filed these petitions to secede from the Union because of their disagreements with the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and U.S. Patriot Act, I believe these are convenient excuses which to hide their true agendas. For example, the U.S. Patriot Act has been on the books since 2001, as well as other reactionary Executive Orders and legislation has been on the books. But as I stated above, other than the State of Texas who from time to time has consistently advocated secession; the others in my opinion disagreed with the outcome of the presidential election and are now yelling secession. Thus, after the election it has now become politically expedient to use the reactionary and oppressive police state policies as an excuse to justify the rhetoric and not publically man-up that real motivation to secede, which is racism.

Many of the southern Confederate States have never gotten over losing the Civil War. I think it is even more disingenuous to desire to secede not just because of “the Patriot Act, the National Defense Authorization Act, and the TSA groping” (these are valid concerns that I share), but the one thing that is being overlooked and left off the list was the racism variable and factor, which is the main motivation to secede. I cannot question what's in some of these secessionist hearts and minds or their motivation relative to the question of secession and how they see it, but I believe the impetus of this movement is rooted in the history of American racism. They were not looking to secede prior to the 2012 presidential election and the conservative right boasted that they were going to make President Barack Obama a one term president and they put over a billion dollars ensure that he was voted out of office. Now, many of these southern racist Confederates are relating back to the language of the American Revolution and Civil War; we are living in the 21st Century under a so-called Republic that is based on democracy. Here is the problem and issue that I am having, the American people voted overwhelmingly for President Barack Obama, he received over 3 million of the popular votes and he won over 300 of the Electoral College votes (this by all standards was a convincing win within a so-called democratic process). The masses of the American electorate rejected Mitt Romney and the conservative Rightwing Agenda and it was that 47% that he openly condemned who sent him home packing. I thought voting was rooted in liberty and represented the highest form of Democracy. The entire secession rhetoric looks suspicious, in particular right after losing the election now this small minority wants to breakaway from the United States of America.

The history of America speaks for itself. Some of their motivations might be entirely different from my racial analysis, but I am not ready to concede that point—knowing the racial history of the United States. Nevertheless, no one can convince me that many of these secessionists have not found the opportunity to shield themselves behind these petitions (claiming constitutionality and liberty). I live in the south and some of these folk still believe we are in the Civil War era and their interpretation of these historical events are colored and rooted in the history of American style racism. I know what they mean when they say that wanting to go back to the 'old south'. One Blogger tried to downplay my argument by trying to equate my assessment to the Zionist strategy here was my response: “ I think it is unfair to lump the Zionist and anti-Semitism analogy to this argument. I am not suggesting that people should not have the right to assess, criticize, evaluate and condemn any behavior that would be deemed unjust. I think those who are much more powerful than African Americans use their influence and power to stifle debate and label any criticism of Jewish (Zionist) behavior as being anti-Semitism; thus, it takes away from the deep seated moral question—the question of what is right and wrong relative to Zionism without being falsely labeled an anti-Semite. I do not think that’s my motive”.

I think many in Blog Sphere already know by the various post and threads that I have written and posted on my Keeping It Real Blog http://fahimknightsworld.blogspot.com/20... for the last five years, thus, how I feel about the false flags and my position on 9/11, it surely is not rooted in the government’s version of these events. I have consistently maintained that President Barack Obama is controlled by the Hidden Hand and the Invisible rulers (like all prior U.S. presidents) such as the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberg. I know there are a lot of smoking mirrors and I do not think anyone has consistently hammered this position perhaps more than I, in particular on my Blog. But once again, George W. Bush in 2000 literally stole an election and bankrupt our government by being the front man (Rothschild’s puppet) that sent our nation into an economic depression not seen since the Great Depression of 1929. He and Bernanke used the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England and induced an artificial economic crisis in 2008 that has devastated the lives of the American people even to this very day. But guess what as terrible as Bush polices were, in particular in greasing the palms of international bankers and Wall Street financiers to the detriment of the American taxpayers (surely his policies reflected taxation without representation in my opinion it was tyranny) his criminal conduct was allowed to coexist in our democracy. But guess what again his 2000 stolen presidential election mirrored something that you would have expected to occur in a Developing Nation; not in a so-called first world democracy. However, after the United States Supreme Court upheld his election; I cannot recall any 'liberals' mandating secession (although many felt democracy was not served) and looking to breakaway from the Union. Our democracy sustained itself until the next election in which Bush won a second term (for better or worse this election was a little more legitimate). No secession was advocated. I did not hear these Confederates filing petitions to secede and based on Bush running a foul of the United States Constitution and law, they in my opinion would have had more legal justification to seek secession grievances. So yes I am very suspicious of the underline intent of these secessionists.

It is also a valid argument that President Obama continued what George W. Bush initiated because he does not have the power or authority to alter the agenda that has been set by the Invisible Rulers. Once again I had thoroughly condemned and criticized some of the same points made by Dave Hodges in his thecommonsenseshow.com article referencing Valerie Jarrett. But Hodges and others like him shocks me by loosely throwing out communism as some boogieman theory and they use this 1950 Marxist analysis to scare the hell out of the ignorant—communist are taking over the country this is ludicrous (Wall Street Bankers have always been the Masters of our country). Thus, Communism did not put us in this present crisis, but CAPITALIST international bankers are responsible for our misery.

However, like I stated above, I am not willing to overlook the racial component in this hold idea of secession and many have tried to explain that there are other motivations associated with secession other than race, which I partially agree. But the dismantling of individual rights and State rights were in full effect when Bush started his reign of revoking our civil liberties. The United States Patriot Act was enacted 43 days after the 9/11 hoax in which he and our government flat out lied that it was an Al-Qaeda attack led by Saddam Hussein out of Iraq (not Osama Bin-Laden) on the World Trade Center and the U.S. financial capitol and our mass silence made us culpable because there was no mass resistance or outrage and the results speaks for itself and we have now come full circle.

If these secessionists were genuine, they would have called for mass revolt and resistance during Bush's tenure. But I am also smart enough to know that these 50 states filing these petitions is more of a symbolic gesture because everyone knows that very few of them (States) could maintain and sustain their sovereignty politically, economically or socially—the geopolitical factors and variables are totally against them without some assistance from the United States Government. So in reality, they would be back at square one (looking towards President Obama and the U.S. taxpayers and Congress to subsidize their independence). But in this symbolic secession argument, it is shrouded in the complexity of racism that has allowed them a privilege status who for over 200 years has been the benefactors of living in 'a pigmentocracy'. They would rather stir people up—often poor whites and appeal to a demographic who thinks they share privilege with the white Elite and they do not understand that we all are pawns regardless of ethnicity, nationality, race, skin color, etc.

The secession idea and the timing of such is a serious reverse play on the race card but many of the pundits will only say what is politically correct. I am pointing that factor out. America has a serious history of divided race relations and the secession movement is a prime indication of such. May be some are right about the culmination and fulfillment of time that has brought us to this space and time. But it is the timing of these secessionist that has driven me to take the position that I have taken. The evidence is clear that 9/11 was a hoax and we were duped on relinquishing our civil liberties in the name of national security; our national treasury was heist by Bush and the international bankers—Robbery Barons and money changers. He led the charge in turning the U.S. Constitution into a worthless piece paper. He also, led the United States into two senseless wars in the false name of patriotism I would argue what other convincing evidence would one need to draw the determination that the time for dissent has been imperative for over 10 years. Many who understand the nature of False Flags have been sounding the alarm. You see President Obama is not the problem he only inherited the script.

Fahim A. Knight, Chief Researcher for keeping it Real Think Tank located in Durham, NC; our mission is to inform African Americans and all people of goodwill, of the pending dangers that lie ahead; as well as decode the symbolism and reinterpreted the hidden meanings behind those who operate as invisible forces, but covertly rules the world. We are of the belief that an enlightened world will be better prepared to throw off the shackles of ignorance and not be willing participants for the slaughter. Our MOTTO is speaking truth to power. Fahim A. Knight-EI can be reached at fahimknight@ yahoo.com.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-El