Rush Limbaugh: Talking Loud and Saying Nothing

RUSH LIMBAUGH: TALKING LOUD AND SAYING NOTHING

By Fahim A. Knight-EL

This writer about a month ago was turning his television channels and just happened to turned to C-Span where the syndicated radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh was giving a public talk. This writer had never heard Limbaugh give a complete public presentation because often the media gives us sound bites and snippets of information. However, this is often done for the ignorant and dumbfound masses by the media to systematically shape and mold public opinion and formulating a perception of a person and/or event for them without presenting them with all the facts which to make an intelligent assessment or evaluation. I had somewhat dismissed Rush Limbaugh a long time ago, as just some loudmouth rightwing conservative who was good at manipulating the fears of poor and middle class whites in order to hustle and pimp them to the bank.

But I must admit, I am guilty of judging Limbaugh from those same sound bites and in actuality had drawn my opinions and conclusions of him from the mass corporate control media (this can be a dangerous trend for any free thinking human being). Thus, this is something that I often do not do, but most of his public comments after assessing them closer were reactionary, but like all Talking Heads their minds and tongues are controlled and their political views do not necessarily reflect any real political departure from the status quo (they are the first line of defense for the Invisible Rulers because they carryout the Art of Propaganda).

The majority of your Talking Heads are only agents of the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberger, which these groups control all discussion (both pro and con). This writer suspects Limbaugh to be an agent of these groups. They pay him to socially and politically agitate and to appeal to the dissatisfied in order create pressure from the bottom and pressure from the top. Limbaugh uses his syndicated radio broadcast where he speaks to over forty (40) million people everyday giving his listening base the Gospel according to this self-proclaimed and self-righteous radio prophet who mixes a pure form of nationalism and a message of good ole American patriotism in his often contradictory diatribe of espousing conservative values.

People have bought into this idea that we have political ideological options within the United States based on our Democracy mainly being of a two party system—Democrat and Republican; this so-called affords us two ideological views or choices that are supposedly of different poles on the political spectrum. However, those that control and manipulate national and international debate always give the appearance to the ignorant masses that there are contradictory viewpoints being espoused (and to falsely lead you into believing that you have political choices). But in reality, according to Allen and Abraham in their monumental book titled, "None Dare call it Conspiracy" there is one debate and it is always carefully crafted to benefit the interest of the Invisible Rulers and the Dynastic Families. So whatever Rush Limbaugh says can not be viewed outside of this context and it does not matter how extreme his views may be; he serves one Master (in reality we all are servants of this small minority of Masters) and they have the money, power and influence to make the likes of Limbaugh a rising star. Who controls the media and what is their objective?

Some have deduced Limbaugh down to a mere entertainer in order to minimize his credibility and dismiss him as having no substance, as far as formulating and shaping public policy. This writer thinks a more appropriate and applicable label when referencing Rush Limbaugh should be pawn. But very few understand the chessboard game that is being played on the lives of humanity. Limbaugh is only a low-level sheep herder and he works in the interest of the Invisible Rulers. This writer considers all media talking heads as mere public entertainers even the ones that most people would deem as being serious and competent reporters such as: George Stepenolopous, Anderson Cooper, Charlie Gibson, Larry King, Barbara Waters, Mike Wallace, Roland Martin, Campbell Brown, Wolf Blitzer, William Bennett, Don Lemon, Kate Snow, Bill Maher, etc., they do not report independent of the agenda and script—they are more of entertainers than Rush Limbaugh (they put on great performances in front of the cameras).

These low level operatives are masters of luring the public to sleep by presenting media distractions and constantly dumbing down America. We should not just be asked to dismiss Limbaugh because of being labled and referred to as an entertainer, but we should be able to see that all these high profile talking heads are mere entertainers as well (the media talking heads put on good performances every night as anchor men and women so-called reporting the “news”). Limbaugh is not the defacto leader of the Republican Party, he is the leader and he is one of the few Republicans who have remained theoretically true to so-called conservative values and right about now, the party is looking for anyone to give direction to a divided and fragmented organization. Limbaugh has a big bully pulpit and there are many who look to him to shape the conservative argument and to talk the code language of white privilege and class espoused best in covert conservative racist ideology, but without directly engaging in political incorrect race baiting (he is really good at this). Thus, often the likes of a Limbaugh it is not what's being said that you need to pay attention, but it is often what aren't be saying that you must pay even closer attention.

Here is the dilemma that the present day Republican Party finds itself after eight years under Bush; President George Bush had an agenda, which he accepted as a low level operative to carryout, the hidden agenda of the Invisible Rulers in which this group do not have any loyalty to low-level party affiliations (conservatives or liberals). They had one objective which was ushering in a New World Order and a One World Government and he turned the conservative core values topsy turvy. We witnessed the national debt climb from five trillion dollars in 2000 when President George W. Bush took office to over ten trillion dollars when he left office in 2008. There was no fiscal responsibility and no fiscal restraints the hallmark signature of past Republican conservative Congresses and Republican Presidents.

Big government exploded under President George Bush, a Republican who's father George Herbert Walker Bush served as partner in crime with conservative maestro President Ronald Wilson Reagan, but none of this mattered because beginning in 2000 unknowing to the masses the world was being restructured and realigned under the leadership of George W. Bush; this would take precedent over all philosophical and political party motives. The Invisible Rulers made every available resource at George W. Bush's disposal which to get all the strategic pieces in place relative to Homeland Security, Patriot Act, new military initiatives or powers, nationalization of banking and finance, revamping the U.S. Jurisprudence system, the massive monetary cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, etc.

Bush gave the appearance of betraying all the fundamental principles that have traditionally represented the philosophy and ideals of the Republican Party. He represented big government at least in theory, a sharp departure from past Republican led governments. Bush perhaps had an assigned mission unlike any other commander-in-chief and most who belong to his political party were oblivious to the goal and objectives because even in the Council of Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, Milner Group, Carlyle Group, etc., there are layers, a circle, within circle. The external (the outer layer) members who belongs to these powerful organizations are not privy to its most secret inner workings (the hidden decision makers that are insulated and desire to be invisible). The likes of George Bush had a greater loyalty to these masters than he had to the Grand Old Party and this is what Rush Limbaugh does not understand or perhaps he does understand and is just part of the duping. His orders could have been to give the appearance that he is presenting the political anti-thesis (he is just part of the controlled argument equation).

Limbaugh at times appears to be a strict constitutional constructionist and he gives these passionate commentaries about the meaning and original intent of this great document and no doubt this resonate with the Second Amendment advocates who are not willing to give up their firearms. The United States Government uses distractions to corral the ignorant masses by constantly bombarding them with gun control propaganda, but the ultimate objective is to disarm the people and this is far removed from good public policy. Rush Limbaugh does understand that a weaken United States Constitution does not serve the interest of those who understand how vitally important it is for us to hold on to the Bill of Rights and fight for our constitution.

It is even sadder because very few high level Republican leaders have come out and said that former President Bush is the blame for the party being fragmented and in disarray and in the public eyes it cost the Republican party the 2008 election at least on the surface; Bush has not been characterized as a Benedict Arnold, perhaps the top level agents were well aware of his mission. Thus, during the 2008 presidential elections you would have thought he had the bubonic plague and Presidential Republican nominee John McCain did everything in his power to keep himself arms lengths away from former President George W. Bush because he was deemed a political liability. Bush could not stump for Senator McCain and he went through the motion as a lame duck.

There has been little political evaluation and criticism of Bush's none role in the 2008 election; it was like he did not exist and the political baggage he carried out weighed the possibility of any good he could have done to assist his party. This was a cold and calculated risk made by the New World Order proponents (let me assure you Bush's presidency was not a failure and within the grand scheme of things—Mission Accomplished). If nothing else they understand whoever is in the U.S. presidential big chair they win regardless. Limbaugh at least give the public impression that he is concerned about the political direction of the Republican Party and has enough emotional rhetoric to rally the troops back to the so-called clarion call of conservative ideals. Limbaugh has never held a public office, but he is in a position to be a flamethrower and wields tremendous political influence over elected officials.

This Talking Head has a loyal following base and not many today's Republicans command the ability to move and sway the party base like this low-level operative. Limbaugh understands you must give the people what they want and right now his base wants fire and brimstone. Governor Bobby Jindal of Louisiana was supposed to be the new rising star of the Republican Party, but how can you trust a man who has refused to publically acknowledge his East Indian heritage and culture. He is also a Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderberger, and Trilateral Commission member. They sent him out as a gofer to rebuttal President Barack Obama's State of the Union address and his performance left a lot to be desired.

The Republicans just refused to lay the nation's blame on President Bush and this lack of critical assessment has left them with no defense and they appear politically disorientated. Rush Limbaugh is the only Republican pundit with a platform and they would not admit to this, but the state of Republican Party rest in the direction he will take it or may be I should say, the direction his hidden paymasters will order him to take the GOP. Limbaugh was quoted as saying he hopes President Obama fails; this writer also hopes he fails, but let me clarify this statement; he was selected to further the New World Order and the One World Government agenda. Therefore, this writer can not in good conscious laud his success because his success marks the total demise of global humanity. The G-20 Summit was held recently in Europe, which was billed as a convening of twenty (20) of the most powerful governments on earth; their hidden objective was to tweak and continue to work out the kinks relative to the One World Government initiatives.

These summits are led by the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Oppenheimers, etc., in which the international financial crisis is being driven by this hidden invisible Elite. This really has never been about the conservative versus liberal, it was more about a paradigm shift, in which none of the old arguments would factor into the minds nor influence this unstoppable trend of globalization. Thus, perhaps you have not notice, but nothing would resemble the world that we are rapidly leaving behind. Limbaugh knows this appeals to the raw emotions of the political right—their fears and their patriotism.

The last administration trampled all over the core values and principles which has traditionally glued this party together with such reckless abandonment, it created a leadership vacuum. Limbaugh recognizes this better than any other so-called conservative voice in America and he is forever seizing the moment to give political and philosophical direction to a party that is struggling for an identity. They truly yearn for yesteryear and Limbaugh has the ability to create a nostalgic fervor like no other present day conservative personality.

The appointment of Michael Steele as the first African American to head the GOP National Committee and perhaps the appointment was a counter to the Democratic Party nominating and electing President Barack Obama as our first African American Commander-in-Chief. But even in 2009 Steele does not have the right skin color to mend a Republican Party whose ideology is historically steeped in southern Confederacy, which is a reflection of a collective conscious. This statement in no way implies that the Democratic Party has differed in their policy initiatives toward African Americans; nevertheless, let us not digress to race and lose focus of the real issues which operates outside of the parameters of race. This is the trump card that the real enemy uses to keep humanity divided and has the ability to shrewdly manipulate the unsolved emotional history of race relations in the United States for their diabolic benefits.

These manipulators have plenty of use for the likes of a Rush Limbaugh. They uses him to appeal to the deep seated and unresolved emotions of a society which created racial havoc for over 310 years. Limbaugh reasons and secure their psychological guilt by making the victims appear as the criminals and the criminals appear as the victims, but this is all done by strategic design. No one is listening to the Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele (I know for sure African Americans aren't listen to him) and the majority of his white constituency do not trust him as the man with the master plan which to once again return the Republican Party into a formidable political machine.

The party has lost its political swagger and the leadership void has further propelled Limbaugh as the man of the hour. Steele a couple of months ago tried to write Limbaugh off as a mere entertainer and he would later come back to make a public apology. Limbaugh as the big Republican political cheese put him on blast, as to say, "the power rest with me and not with you." This induce economic crisis has render politics as usual as being obsolete because the rules of the game has changed. Walter Fauntroy an old confidante of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr, used to say good politics was being in the room when the money was being divided. I guess Limbaugh would like to blame America's economic depression on the poor and 'have nots' and use them as the scapegoats for America's economic woes. I wonder has he read the "Protocols of the Learnt Elders of Zion" and I wonder, how would he be perceived if he attacked American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and the Zionist with same fervor that he attacks blacks and Latinos?

Limbaugh knows and understands that it is easy to ridicule a powerless people and know the political repercussion would be minimum at best. Moreover, just think about this, two United States Presidents (Bush and Obama) have given the world's corporate Elite over 161 billion dollars of the taxpayers money which automatically represents the enslavement of five unborn American generations (it is called passing the debt on). Limbaugh even during this economic depression is dependent upon advertisement dollars--

JPMorgan $25 billion; Citigroup $25 billion; Wells Fargo $25 billion; Bank of America $15 billion;

Merrill Lynch $10 billion; (NOTE) Goldman Sachs $10 billion; Morgan Stanley $10 billion;

Bank of New York Mellon $3 billion; State Street Corp $2 billion; Bank of Commerce $17 million;

First Financial Svcs $16 million; UCBH Holdings Inc $299 million; Northern Trust Corp $1.6 billion;

SunTrust Banks $3.5 billion; Broadway Financial Corp $9 million; Washington Federal $200 million;

BB&T Corp $3.1 billion; Provident Bancshares Corp $151 million; Umpqua Holdings Corp $214 million;

Comerica $2.3 billion Regions Financial $3.5 billion Capital One Financial $3.6 billion;

First Horizon National $866 million; Huntington Bancshares $1.4 billion; KeyCorp $2.5 billion;

Valley National Bancorp $300 million; Zions Bancorp $1.4 billion; Marshall & Ilsley Corp $1.7 billion;

US Bancorp $6.6 billion; TCF Financial $361 million; First Niagara Financial $184 million;

HF Financial Corp $25 million; Centerstate Banks Fla. $28 million; First Community Bancshares, Inc. $42 million;

Western Alliance Bancorp. $140 million; Webster Financial $400 million; Pacific Capital Bancorp. $181 million;

Heritage Commerce Corp. $40 million; Ameris Bancorp. $52 million; Porter Bancorp $35 million;

Banner Corp $124 million; Cascade Financial $39 million; Columbia Banking $77 million;

Heritage Financial Corp. $24 million; First PacTrust Bancorp. $19 million Severn Bancorp, Inc. $23 million;

Boston Private $154 million; Associated Banc-Corp $525 million; Trustmark Corp $215 million;

First Community Corp. $11 million Taylor Capital $105 million; Nara Bancorp, Inc. $67 million.

Limbaugh suffers from diarrhea of the of the mouth and he is constantly blaming the "liberals" for the economic, political and social troubles of the United States (this allows the real troublemaker to continue to hide and carry out their deceptive acts against all humanity). This pawn wouldn't dare tell the public that Henry Kissinger wields more power and control over the affairs of America and the world than President Barack Obama. He does not possess the intestinal fortitude to tell his gullible listening audience that the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Oppenheimer, etc., the international bankers have induced this economic depression and credit crunch to further place that noose around our necks, chain and ball around the minds of their modern slaves. There is truly no honor amongst thieves and if the talking heads were to tell the people the truth their careers and the financial crumbs would dry up like stagnated water in a sizzling hot desert.

Limbaugh perhaps knows that someone possess the power and authority to call the debt-in, which is outside the framework of the Democratic process and is not bind by the U.S. Constitutional legal framework (this group functions outside of all sovereign and legal jurisdictions the world over). This writer predicts that Limbaugh influence will only increase because of the desperation and the hopelessness that has been created inside of the United States. People are looking for someone to lead them and provide them with guidance--the government has failed them and at same time enriched the international bankers and their Dynastic families at the expense of the ignorant.

Limbaugh knows how far to go and he will not cross certain lines and he will never lay blame upon the real culprits. He is atypical of how western media functions; journalism is censored and it is highly controlled—they systematically feed us government propaganda in order to keep us confused and dumbfound. Limbaugh and no other western Talking Head can not be trusted; they are the gatekeepers of our enslavement because they feed our minds sublimely with decoded messages designed to keep us politically ignorant and misinformed while they silently rule over all humanity without any real opposition.

Fahim A. Knight-EL Chief Researcher for KEEPING IT REAL THINK TANK located in Durham, NC; our mission is to inform African Americans and all people of goodwill, of the pending dangers that lie ahead; as well as decode the symbolisms and reinterpreted the hidden meanings behind those who operate as invisible forces, but covertly rules the world. We are of the belief that an enlightened world will be better prepared to throw off the shackles of ignorance and not be willing participants for the slaughter. Our MOTTO is speaking truth to power. Fahim A. Knight-EL can be reached at fahimknight@yahoo.com.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-EL

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
earthling's picture
Member since:
22 November 2004
Last activity:
1 week 5 days

Fahim, could you please improve the structure of your posts?

You have many things to say, and it would be more effective if you said the same things, but not expect people to read it end to end.

Don't be offended, please.

Your posts are like books - you have to read the whole thing to understand it.

Maybe give an introduction, a list of chapters, even an index.

Perhaps post 3 shorter posts, and link to them. You can even get your own blog sites for free, and link to those. You can link to specific chapters of a longer piece of work.

I just think it would be more effective, given the short attention span that most people have on the internet.

PS: of course Rush is being paid to be loud. There is some substance there, but his main job is to be loud.

Similar to Howard Stern, or Mary Matalin, or Mary's husband James Carville.

---
It is not how fast you go
it is when you get there.

red pill junkie's picture
Member since:
12 April 2007
Last activity:
6 hours 39 min
Quote:

this writer also hopes he fails, but let me clarify this statement; he was selected to further the New World Order and the One World Government agenda. Therefore, this writer can not in good conscious laud his success because his success marks the total demise of global humanity

So Rush is a servant of these hidden masters; and he wants Obama to fail; but Obama is also a player in the NWO agenda... I don't get this.

-----
It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me...
It's all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!

Red Pill Junkie

daydreamer's picture
Member since:
21 February 2009
Last activity:
5 weeks 1 day

Youch, and i thought i was guilty of massive posting.

I working in Saudi Arabia a few months ago and the prevalent Muslim opinion out there was very similar. Lots of talk about secret western world governments and conspiracies, but taken from their position of leading people away from the true path to Allah.

I'm not sure that you need much more than incompetence and a willingness to sell out to whoever is giving you money to explain the last bunch.

Human psychology can explain why democracies around the world stabilize at 2 or 3 party solutions (democratic system dependent of course).

Now, where does Sarah Palin fit into all this?

Cookiee's picture
Member since:
6 April 2009
Last activity:
2 years 30 weeks

I have to agree with the user: earthling's comment and suggestions on restructuring these long posts. I also believe that your wonderful attempts in educating the masses on these crucial global issues,truths and hidden agendas of these terrorists will be understood with more clarity if you break down your choice of vocabulary for some of us.Remember,the masses have been robbed of education..Not all of us have had the privillege of higher education.Your advice regarding these issues
with regards to what the masses may do to best try and throw of these shackles would
be invaluable.

Delaiah's picture
Member since:
1 May 2004
Last activity:
13 hours 34 min

is that Fahim is clearly badly conflicted and his writing reflects it.

On one hand he agrees to some degree with Limbaugh and Republican fiscal policies, as well as the promise of the U.S. Constitution. On the other he has clear prejudices against whites (somewhat understandable) and Jews (a combination of Moslem views and white supremacist(!) conspiracy theory).

Fahim needs to evaluate and ground his world-view. This would enable him to deal with his conflicts from a point of clarity. I would urge him to start with religious and national identity.

Much of this appears to be a reaction to one televised speech and some superficial media treatment. Limbaugh is on the radio for hours a day and has written a couple of books. Fahim should be able to find a title, read it, and form a more complete opinion.

fahim knight's picture
Member since:
22 December 2007
Last activity:
2 weeks 5 days
Delaiah wrote:

is that Fahim is clearly badly conflicted and his writing reflects it.

On one hand he agrees to some degree with Limbaugh and Republican fiscal policies, as well as the promise of the U.S. Constitution. On the other he has clear prejudices against whites (somewhat understandable) and Jews (a combination of Moslem views and white supremacist(!) conspiracy theory).

Fahim needs to evaluate and ground his world-view. This would enable him to deal with his conflicts from a point of clarity. I would urge him to start with religious and national identity.

Much of this appears to be a reaction to one televised speech and some superficial media treatment. Limbaugh is on the radio for hours a day and has written a couple of books. Fahim should be able to find a title, read it, and form a more complete opinion.

I disagree; no the article was about offering an objective balance assessment and granting points that I deemed favorably towards Rush Limbaugh when deserving and taking him to task by offering critical analysis of some of his reactionary viewpoints. The conflict is working to overcome the many political, social and economic contradictions that humanity is faced with on a daily basis. I am very clear on the issues and can intellectually stand on everything that I have written. I do abhor racism, discrimination and social injustice; moreover, I have fought against these evils all my adult life. No. I do not have any prejudices against whites and Jews and I reject your many mis-characterizations of me. You do not know enough about me to make such definitive statements. I do agree with many of the political and perhaps some of the religious views that is espoused by Muslims and Islam (that’s personal decision), but these views are not tied to white supremacy ideology or agenda as you implied. You comments were very insulting to me, but often there is a double standard on the TDG; you all can make all manner of negative and insulting comments towards me and the minute I start responding to some of these foolish cheap shots—you all will start screaming to Greg the moderator to have me banned. I have sat back and not responded to Earthling and the others because many of them are just big cry babies and this is part of the good ole boy and good ole girl click, which is gathering together and making these quasi-condescending and covert reckless comments that are baseless against me. I will respond to each of them; although, some of them do not even deserved to be dignified.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-EL

earthling's picture
Member since:
22 November 2004
Last activity:
1 week 5 days

Oh Man Fahim

you are not a woman, I think, so I can call you Man.

I have disagreed with you frequently, but I have never asked for you to be banned or for your posts to be deleted.

I have on 1 occasion asked for you to take back a serious insult and accusation , and you did not do that.

Even after that I keep talking to you, like reasonable people do.

There are similar minds who can cam come to very different conclusions.

Perhaps you recall your angry insult, the criminal accusation you threw against me.

Perhaps you do not, and for you it was a trivial matter.

Do you remember? I still ask you to take back the insult.

Think about it, when you have time.

----
It is not how fast you go
it is when you get there.

red pill junkie's picture
Member since:
12 April 2007
Last activity:
6 hours 39 min

The moment someone starts writing direct insuls to other person —be that person yourself, or somebody else— I will immediately delete it, and post a message explaining the deletion.

IMO Delaiah's comment was critical of you, but not insulting. There's a fine and blurry line there, and I may not be able to tell the difference most of the time; but I'll try to do my best and being fair.

And yes, let me remind you that you yourself have written comments in the past that were in fact insulting to other members; these comments were not deleted that time. There's always a poblem when trying to moderate free speech of course, one person's criticism might be found as an insult to another, and some people are more thick-skinned than some other folks.

It's not easy.

We TDG admins have tried to do our best. If you feel you're given a different standard, I suggest you write an e-mail to Greg.

So a word of advise to any other member willing to enter this discussion: criticize the argument as much as you want, but don't let the criticism be aimed towards the person, ok?

-----
It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me...
It's all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!

Red Pill Junkie

fahim knight's picture
Member since:
22 December 2007
Last activity:
2 weeks 5 days

That is your opinion and I have mine; you sound irate and defensive on behalf of the good ole boys network. Thus, to me the comments were insulting and derogatory. But like I have said in the past; I do not need a cheering squad and I can competently stand and intellectually defend every contention I have made. Since you can not see what is insulting let me spell it out for you. I am not racist against whites and Jews. I am against Zionism and any other form of racism; thus, this accusation or implied accusation was ill-advised and possess a slanderous intent. I have disagreements with many whites and perhaps some Zionist on this site, as well as with other people. But not from a racist perspective. Greg has in the past cautioned me at the behest of a cry baby and he has fairly cautioned other posters about various threads and how the argument should proceed. I personally do not care what you do, but give these same harsh instructions to your good ole boy friends on the site. We can see right through your wording and the intent is not impartial.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-EL

earthling's picture
Member since:
22 November 2004
Last activity:
1 week 5 days

Who are the "we" that can see right through it?

You Fahim of course, and who else? Are you an individual or do you represent an organization?

----
It is not how fast you go
it is when you get there.

fahim knight's picture
Member since:
22 December 2007
Last activity:
2 weeks 5 days

Yes, I represent myself and there is an organization that I am affiliated with whom also views the TDG site along with myself. So, the personal and plural tense are intentional nouns and proper pronouns congregating with a verb, which gives the personal and collective tense. I hope that answers your question; thus, that is furthest I am going entertain your inquisitive curiosity.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-EL

red pill junkie's picture
Member since:
12 April 2007
Last activity:
6 hours 39 min

I'll try to be more impartial then.

And BTW, you still haven't answered my dilemma: how come both Limbaugh & Obama can be both servants of these invisible master pulling the strings of politics in the US and the rest of the world?

IMHO it doesn't make sense.

-----
It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me...
It's all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!

Red Pill Junkie

fahim knight's picture
Member since:
22 December 2007
Last activity:
2 weeks 5 days

The best written source is Allen and Abraham's book titled, "None Dare Call it Conspiracy" and Carroll Quigley's book titled, "Tragedy and Hope" there are others but I wanted to give perhaps the two that helped shape my argument. Here are the facts Rush Limbaugh and President Barack Obama are both members of the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberger Group. Thus, those who delve into what is perceived as conspiracy theory believe these three groups are sinister and operate in covert deception. However, others might not see it this way and I respect their perspective; although we may disagree. There is a circle, within a circle, with a circle which creates internal and external layers—powers and assignments are giving pursuant to a member’s organizational rank and there level within the three said organization. Members and initiates may not even know the assignment of each other and often this is done by design. The likes of the Rockefellers, DeBeers, Oppenhiemers, Rothschilds, etc., are the brain trust and the mindsets behind the agenda and objectives of how these organizations and others like them will politically, economically and socially move over humanity. In "None Dare Call it Conspiracy" they refer to as inducing pressure from the top and pressure bottom (interpreted to meaning they win regardless who is in political office). I was trained early on in my life by a Jewish mentor named Mr. Seymour and Mr. Seymour was from old Eastern Europe and he spoke Yiddish and as a young boy I would sit for hours listening to Mr. Seymour and he told me something that stayed with me for a life time. Thus, he said Jews do not vote a particular party (Democrat or Republican); he said Jews vote issues (they are smart enough to put their finances behind both candidates; so he said Fahim we will always win regardless). I valued my relationship with Mr. Seymour; he taught me so much about politics. It is my opinion that Barack ascended to his position as the United States President because he agreed and accepted a hidden agenda, which to further the New World Order and the One World Government. Rush Limbaugh has accepted the same agenda and they present to the public that they are diametrically opposed to each, but when in fact they are both low level servants who serve the same master. The Rockefellers, DeBeers, Oppenhiemers, Rothschilds, etc., they make the public believe that these two pawns are the anti-thesis to each other. This is the furthest thing from the truth (Barack and Limbaugh are on the same team; knowingly or unknowingly). For example, President Bush was part of the New World Order agenda as a conservative Republican and President Obama has pick up the torch as a liberal Democrat; both Bush and Obama had the same orders—One World Government. Limbaugh and Obama are sophisticated sheep herders. This is my explanation based on my study and there are millions around the world who share in this perspective. Lastly, we reject the characterization of being labeled a conspiracy theory and our approach is viewed by us a being paranormal.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-EL

red pill junkie's picture
Member since:
12 April 2007
Last activity:
6 hours 39 min

I don't think there has been any blog post of yours, Fahim, in which you don't cite that particular book— the "None Dare Call it a Conspiracy".

From that book —written in the 70s— you extrapolate all sorts of conclusions. You give for granted that everything that happens in modern XXIst century politics can be explained by this one book.

a book can be a valuable source of reference. It cannot be an ultimate repository of knowledge.

For the record, I do believe that Barack Obama —as any modern politician— must have had to make compromises in order to climg the ladder of power. This is soemthing we are all aware of. This is a given in any modern political system; you have to know the "rules of the game" in order to win the game.

But that does not necessarily mean—as far as I'm concerned— that the game is controlled by these Hidden Masters you give so much credence to. The world does not revolve around them. To me, there's no secret Zionist conspiracy, just as much as the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" is a real book—it is not. IT IS NOT. IT IS NOT.

If you perceive the world as a staging or a charade installed by the hidden powers to control the dumb masses, then of course everything that happens reinforces that perception.

But I would suggest you consider that this perception is false.

PS: I don't have a problem with the level of vocabulary you use in your blog posts, or the grammatic syntax you employ. But I certainly would welcome some division in your paragraphs—as Greg once told to daydreamer, it helps the reader to know when to breathe :)— this is of course a suggestion; as you yourself wrote, you are free to write in your blog as you see fit, just don't expect many people to read it if you're not sensible to readers' needs.

-----
It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me...
It's all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!

Red Pill Junkie

fahim knight's picture
Member since:
22 December 2007
Last activity:
2 weeks 5 days

No you got it completely wrong; you can not pull one posting (blog article that I have written) and show me where there were no paragraph breakings. I have posted over 60 articles and all of them have paragraph breakings. So that much is not true. The only valid point that I concede and I think someone referenced it was that my articles are extremely long. I agree and this observation is valid. Thus, I cite and quote many sources throughout the majority of my articles and yes one of my favorite just happens to be "None Dare Call it Conspiracy”. But your analysis is flawed and you being an intelligent man, I expect a little better reasoning from you. Let me give you an example, the Holy Bible was written over 2,000 years ago, but people do not discard the Bible based on age and how many years ago these events described in the Bible took place. Scholars and religious parishners use the Bible to assess and draw parallel to today’s events although it was written 2,000 years ago. Scholars and researchers always use the works of prior scholars to add credibility and/or prove or disprove certain intellectual contentions. Thus, because "None Dare Call it Conspiracy" was written in the 1970s is no valid argument that the research should not be considered for discussion in 2009; no more than one dismissing the Bible as a legitimate piece of religious history based on its age. You can not speak for the many people who are surfing the Internet (I get emails quite often from people who have found my TDG writings via surfing) so keep in my mind the TDG has a wide world audience who may not ever enter our chat room and blog discussion, but they are reading and learning; not just from my Blog, but others as well. Please keep that in mind and if people within this limited setting chose not to read my work that is entirely up to them. But I am just contesting your double standard. Many on this site delve into Ancient Kemet (Egypt) and they quote sources hundreds and in some instances thousands of years old. I do no see where you offer the same critical analysis and render their contribution as being non-credible because they quote old sources to validate their arguments.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-EL

red pill junkie's picture
Member since:
12 April 2007
Last activity:
6 hours 39 min

If you don't want to change your writing style, Fahim, it's fine by me.

But just keep in mind that your post above shows exactly what I was referring to. If you had broken your response into several paragraphs it would be easier to read —sometmes it's hard for the eyes to keep track of the letters, specially in a computer monitor. That's all I'm saying...

OK, so you posit that this book 'None Dare Call it a Conspiracy" has still a lot of applicabilily regardless of the year it was written. I can accept that.

What I have a harder time accepting, is viewing everything that happens in the political stage as proof of a grand conspiracy.

Obama wins the election? He's part of the conspiracy.

That AIG guy who comitted suicide? Part of the grand plan.

From that perspective, everything that happens merely reinforces that belief in an orchestated manipulation. And if someone criticizes that perspective, he or she can be seen as either a gullible sheep, or another conspirator.

You either see everything as proof of a conspiracy, or you don't believe in any conspiracy whatsoever. Those extremes might not be the right approach.

IMO, we should try to think in a third alternative: where there are events and decisions that are part of some intent to influence the outcome by powerful groups; but that these influences are also subject to unforeseen circumstances —accidents, errors, miscalculations, acts of God, etc.

In other words: that not everything is part of a grand plan.

Nobody denies the fact that the world of politics is full of secret agreements, compromises and handshakes under the table. That's the way the game is played.

But to go out and say that everything is a charade designed to make us believe that we live in a democracy, while the secret masters of the world play with us like chess pieces on a global board, it's too extreme.

I just don't see it that way. I may be wrong, but I haven't seen any proof of it.

-----
It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me...
It's all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!

Red Pill Junkie

earthling's picture
Member since:
22 November 2004
Last activity:
1 week 5 days

Thank you for the non-answer, it illuminates the situation.

Another suggestion - learn to use plain language, as well as structure of presentation, to bring across your points more clearly.

----
It is not how fast you go
it is when you get there.

fahim knight's picture
Member since:
22 December 2007
Last activity:
2 weeks 5 days

Will not dignify ignorance. I do not believe in “dumbing”down because of others level of incompetency.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-EL

earthling's picture
Member since:
22 November 2004
Last activity:
1 week 5 days

Communication is why we write.

If you only write for yourself, of course that is up to you. It does not really demonstrate your superior competency.

The choice of vocabulary is not that important. A good structure of the writing, on the other hand, is very helpful.

----
It is not how fast you go
it is when you get there.

fahim knight's picture
Member since:
22 December 2007
Last activity:
2 weeks 5 days
earthling wrote:

Communication is why we write.

If you only write for yourself, of course that is up to you. It does not really demonstrate your superior competency.

The choice of vocabulary is not that important. A good structure of the writing, on the other hand, is very helpful.

----
It is not how fast you go
it is when you get there.

That is your opinion and the structure of my Blog meets my standard and you can structure your Blog as you please. But your criticism of my structure holds no merit and you are just soothing your own intellectual ego. Please cite me some examples. Thus, vocabulary is very important and your statement is more contradictory than anything else. You want me "dumbing" down my conversation. I refuse.

Stay Awake Until Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-EL

earthling's picture
Member since:
22 November 2004
Last activity:
1 week 5 days

Maybe you don't see this, but your posts here on TDG have no structure whatsoever.

It looks more like a stream of conciousness. Which of course is a style in itself.

Try simple things, like paragraph breaks. Punctuation, things like that.

Really, you non-style of writing makes it look as it you don't know what you are talking about. Not because of the content, just because of the non-style.

Really Fahim, you have things to say, but you don't know how to write.

----
It is not how fast you go
it is when you get there.

fahim knight's picture
Member since:
22 December 2007
Last activity:
2 weeks 5 days

You have no idea what writing is all about. My work is received around the world by layman and academics. You are just running off at the mouth; talking loud and saying nothing. Thus, you want me to dumb down my conversation to fit your level ignorance and intellectual incompetency. I will never apologize to you for telling the truth. I stand by every word I have ever said to you and that is why I constantly ignore your pleas for an apology because I know your history better than you. Now! Lets move on and transition into the article relative to Rush Limbaugh; you sound like a broken record. We are getting a good laugh at your level of ignorance. I love intellectually whopping and tearing your behind apart.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight

Greg's picture
Member since:
30 April 2004
Last activity:
2 hours 32 min
fahim knight wrote:

Thus, you want me to dumb down my conversation to fit your level ignorance and intellectual incompetency.

That would be a warning for you Fahim - personal insults are not allowed here. I would add that you might want to respond more reasonably to constructive comments, rather than taking them as insults as you have done here. That doesn't mean you have to agree with the criticism, or change on account of them. Acknowledging them in a fair manner however would be good etiquette.

I would also suggest to Earthling to let the topic drop - you made your point about the difficulties in reading the article. Fahim disagrees. Any further iterations of the same point are simply baiting.

Kind regards,
Greg
-------------------------------------------
You monkeys only think you're running things
@DailyGrail

fahim knight's picture
Member since:
22 December 2007
Last activity:
2 weeks 5 days

I agree.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-EL

earthling's picture
Member since:
22 November 2004
Last activity:
1 week 5 days

I believe I have said all that needs to be said on this topic. Fahim, and the rest of the world, won't gain from more of the same stuff.

PS:

Ok that was too harsh above.

I know that Fahim is an intelligent man, and he will consider all this, in his own time.

----
It is not how fast you go
it is when you get there.