Documention Of Zionist Ashkenazi {Khazar} Jewish Deceptions And Lies. The Bibical Jews Were Negroid And So Was Jesus!

Actually, I did this research years ago in libraries. This was, of course, before the internet, word processor, or fax. But, we had microfilm and the telex. In any case, about 50 years ago I knew two Ashkenazi {Khazar} Jews who had renounced Zionism, not Judeaism; because, they were disgusted with the political philosophy of Zionism. The difference between Judeaism and Zionism is that Judeaism is a religion and Zionism is a political philosophy that is, to say the least, strongly influenced by Social Darwinism. In this regard, it should be noted that Social Darwinism comes from the works of Herbert Spencer and Alfred Walace, not Charles Darwin. The concept of "Survival of the Fittest" comes from Herbert Spencer, not Charles Darwin.

Based on what my Ashkenazi friends told me, I started doing a lot of research. And, I cross referenced and documented everything they told me and, in the process, I learned much more. In doing this research, I became familiar with Benjamin Harrison Freedman. He converted to Roman Catholism. I think that is why my Ashkenazi Jewish friends didn't tell me about him.

I recently found this documentation. I know that it is true; because, I did the research through other library resources. So, I'm going to simply present the documentation that proves that Khazar Ashkenazi Jews were not the Biblical Jews. http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com will agree with me about this. Some of this documentation is redundant on purpose; because, it comes from different sources and, as such, cross references itself.

http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israe...

http://www.rense.com/general34/amaz.htm

http://iamthewitness.com/

Read "The Thirteenth Tribe" By Arthur Koestler free online.
http://iamthewitness.com/books/Arthur.Ko...

This could be of some interest, but, it isn't directly related to the above.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joOyuWsF-vs

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
AncientSkyMan's picture
Member since:
1 May 2004
Last activity:
16 weeks 2 days

Why believe archealogical digs or entombed remains DNA. Your few sources must be right in light of the libraries full of works going back thousands of years that the Jews were semites who were an olive skined dark curly haired people. Black peoples had their own empires to the south, but even in Egypt, black rule gave way to the tan skined peoples of the upper Nile. Do a little research on Rome. You know, that huge empire that controlled all of Israel a couple thousand years ago. They had great artists. You don't doubt that the various Ceasars look as they did because of the fine life-like sculptures they left behind. The horses, dogs, romans, armor, all done to life like quality. So why then would the Romans depect the Jews (as they have done in hundreds of different sculptures) as curly haired semetic featured people and not african black featured people. Were all these hundreds of years of Roman artist involved in some great conspiracy? How about all the middle ages paintings, from Jewish families known to be hundreds of years old. . . conspiracy too I suppose. Yep, all those statues and art pieces must have been made in the past few years to make up for all the REAL statues of the black jews that were destroyed by the conspiracy of Rome. . . . or, maybe your sources are full of it. Hmmm, I vote for the second.

ASM

cnnek's picture
Member since:
28 June 2006
Last activity:
1 year 28 weeks

Khazar Ashkenazi Jews, 85% of the Jews today, from Eastern Europe and Asia are depicted. In terms of Jesus, no one knows what he looked like; but, like other Biblical Jews, he was negroid. The Pharoes of Egypt before the Ptolomys were negroid also. In the Louvre Musium in Paris there are drawings of the face of the Sphix before the French solders broke its nose and lips. I have seen them. The face is negroid. In terms of statues of negroid Jews, Christians destroyed any that might have existed. Christians are dirty and they wanted a white Jesus. Most Christian and Zionist Ashkenazi Jew leaders are manipulative hypocritical lyers who want to control your mind. In this regard, all Ashkenazi Jews are not Zionists and my opposition is to Zionism and the Talmud, not Judeaism and the Tora. In short, history has been manipulated to suit the purposes of the Christians and the Zionist Ashkenazi Jews. But, the true history can still be found by doing research.

What do you think?

cnnek

{You Can Teach People How To Think Critically Or What To Think; But, You Can't Do Both! It Is Better To Teach People How To Think Critically!!!}

earthling's picture
Member since:
22 November 2004
Last activity:
6 weeks 17 hours

I think your analysis is not particularly calm and objective, when you say things like:

Quote:

Christians are dirty and they wanted a white Jesus. Most Christian and Zionist Ashkenazi Jew leaders are manipulative hypocritical lyers who want to control your mind.

This suggests that you are rather biased about the subject.

----
We are the cat.

cnnek's picture
Member since:
28 June 2006
Last activity:
1 year 28 weeks

The fact is that Europeans wanted a white Jesus and a White Christian Church. There was a great deal of prejudice involved. The European zeel for a white controled everything was part of the motivation for the Crusades.

What do you think?

cnnek

{You Can Teach People How To Think Critically Or What To Think; But, You Can't Do Both! It Is Better To Teach People How To Think Critically!!!}

cnnek's picture
Member since:
28 June 2006
Last activity:
1 year 28 weeks

European monarchs wanted to creat unity in their kingdoms. The could have cared less about Jesus. But, Jesus could provide a focal point and strongly influence the unification process. But, there was one problem. Lily white Europeans were not going to worship a negroid Jesus. So, they had to creat a lily white Jesus for lily white Europeans.

What do you think?

cnnek

{You Can Teach People How To Think Critically Or What To Think; But, You Can't Do Both! It Is Better To Teach People How To Think Critically!!!}

red pill junkie's picture
Member since:
12 April 2007
Last activity:
31 min 43 sec

Oh, you found your information on Rense, did you?

Oh, yeah. That certainly would give it the seal of authentication.

For the record, I don't believe Jesus was a white dude with blue eyes or whatever. But also find hard to believe the 1st century Jews inhabiting Palestine were 'negroid'.

And I'm also against all the sh*t Israelis have done on the Palestine people, even if there are many pendejos among the Palestinians who only focus on an 'eye-for-an-eye' mentality. All of them should get a nice spanking from their mommies and play nice, as far as I'm concerned.

It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me...
It's all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!

Red Pill Junkie
_______________
@red_pill_junkie

cnnek's picture
Member since:
28 June 2006
Last activity:
1 year 28 weeks

I found my information before there was an internet. The internet sites that I posated have the same information. So, I used them.

What do you think?

cnnek

{You Can Teach People How To Think Critically Or What To Think; But, You Can't Do Both! It Is Better To Teach People How To Think Critically!!!}

red pill junkie's picture
Member since:
12 April 2007
Last activity:
31 min 43 sec

There have been questionable books even before they were questionable websites :-P

But anyway, don't we have remains of 1st century Jews available for DNA sampling? I still remember all the hoopla James Cameron caused with his 'Tomb of Jesus' documentary. I'm sure there are other places where we can dig up some bones and study them.

It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me...
It's all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!

Red Pill Junkie
_______________
@red_pill_junkie

cnnek's picture
Member since:
28 June 2006
Last activity:
1 year 28 weeks

Jesus was of the House of David. Jesus was negroid. Personally, I don't see what the big deal is. Black, Yellow, Olive, or Beige Skin should make no difference. Albinos are white. Jesus was negroid. But, so what? What's the difference?

What do you think?

cnnek

{You Can Teach People How To Think Critically Or What To Think; But, You Can't Do Both! It Is Better To Teach People How To Think Critically!!!}

red pill junkie's picture
Member since:
12 April 2007
Last activity:
31 min 43 sec

I agree, there shouldn't be any difference from a social point of view.

The difference strives in whether that's an historical fact or nor. Facts matter more than opinions, and that's coming from a moral relativist (me) mind you ;)

It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me...
It's all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!

Red Pill Junkie
_______________
@red_pill_junkie

fahim knight's picture
Member since:
22 December 2007
Last activity:
27 weeks 1 day

According to the Bible the ancient Egyptians were descended from Ham through the line of Mizraim. Ham had four sons: Cush, Mizraim, Phut, and Canaan (Genesis 10:6). The name "Mizraim" is the original name given for Egypt in the Hebrew Old Testament. Many Bibles will have a footnote next to the name "Mizraim" explaining that it means "Egypt." The name "Egypt" itself actually comes to us from the Greeks who gave the Land that name (i.e. "Aegyptos" from the Greek). In addition to the name "Mizraim," the ancient Egyptians also referred to their land as "Kemet" which means "Land of the Blacks." Western historians, however, say that the word "Kemet" refers to the color of the soil of the land rather than its people. But, the word "Kemet" is actually an ethnic term being a derivative of the word "Khem" (Cham or Ham) which means "burnt" or "black." Ham, who was one of the three sons of Noah and the direct ancestor of the Egyptians, was black. The Bible, in the Old Testament, repeatedly refers to Egypt as the "Land of Ham" (i.e., Psalm 105:23, 27; 106:22). Regarding the ancient Egyptians, there is also considerable historical evidence, aside from the Holy Bible, that they were of Black or Negro origin. Even today the true Egyptian is not to be found in the cities but in the country sides and farmlands of Egypt. Most of the Egyptians in the cities carry a mixed ancestry of European and Asian, but mostly Asian from the immigration and invasions of various people into Egypt throughout the centuries. Very few people realize that Cleopatra was of Greek origin because the Greeks once ruled Egypt and she was descended from one of those Greek rulers. The true Egyptian found in the countryside, however, has dark brown to black skin and very pronounced Negro features. This is particularly true the further south one travels in Egypt. It was from the south that the original pharaohs and the people of Egypt settled the land. The original rulers and builders of Egyptian civilization were of completely Black or Negro origin.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-EL

thefloppy1's picture
Member since:
1 May 2004
Last activity:
11 weeks 2 days

I have very little knowledge of this but, it does explain a lot of art work from the very early dynasties.

Also, on the Emerald Tablets, Thoth writes that he was instructed to "go east to the land of Khem and civilize the hairy barbarians".

"Life can be whatever you want it to be, as long as you do what your told."
LRF.

red pill junkie's picture
Member since:
12 April 2007
Last activity:
31 min 43 sec

So if Khem means 'black, Then Egypt could either be 'the land of blacks', or the 'black land'. The subtle change in syntaxis makes a lot of difference.

Maybe the original name of Egypt refers to the fact that there were black tribes inhabiting that region of Africa, that could have been driven out by the group that later built the Egyptian civilization —just as the indigenous people of the United States were driven out by the European colonists.

I mean, if the people of Egypt were all black, then to me it doesn't make too much sense that they would make the distinction of calling their home "the land of blacks". Why pointing it out, since they are all the same? —it would be as if the Aztecs would have called their nation 'the land of brownies'... that don't make sense señor :-P

The distinction only makes sense (IMHO) if you're an outsider and give the name to illustrate a feature different from what is familiar to you.

Obviously, if one were to make DNA analysis of Egyptian mummies, you would no doubt find a lot of African DNA, but that's because the ancient empire of Nubia conquered Egypt during the history of that civilization. There was also the regular exchange of princesses between different kingdoms (hitites, sumerians and what have you) to seal alliances —There's even this theory that Nefertiti was a Mitanni princess.

But, in all probability, what one might call the Egyptian DNA —LOL is there a Mexican DNA??— might end up being such a mixture of different 'races', that you would have to give it an entirely new category of its own.

Ancient Egyptians didn't seem too squeamish about getting intimate with foreigner visitors —just ask Cleopatra ;)

PS: And yes, I know Cleopatra was late Ptolemaic, aka 'Greek'.

It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me...
It's all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!

Red Pill Junkie
_______________
@red_pill_junkie

fahim knight's picture
Member since:
22 December 2007
Last activity:
27 weeks 1 day

EGYPT (KEMET):THE DNA SCIENCE, HISTORY AND RACISM REVEALED

By FAHIM A. KNIGHT-El

There are two website named HALL OF MAAT; WEIGHING THE EVIDENCE OF ALTERNATIVE HISTORY and the GRAHAM HANCOCK website, both seemed to have dedicated part of their discussion forums to the intellectual and scientific research of Kemet (Egypt) and while blogging on the TDG (The Daily Grail) site this writer discovered on the sidebar of the site there was an icon referencing these two above said Internet forums. Thus, this was in late December 2007, I had just web/blog published an article titled, “Christmas—Jesus the Sun God: Lies, Deception and the Truth,” which this controversial subject and topic, had its pundits and apologist debating the article on various Internet websites. One of the above listed forums allowed me to submit the article, but the article was immediately removed—I contacted the webmaster who informed me that it was a matter of a technical glitch and he assured me that article would be reposted. Thus, if my memory serves me correctly, the webmaster was celebrating his birthday in December and was at a social outing, commemorating this occasion with his family and friends, when this writer emailed him. He emailed me back and stated after the outing he would investigate this matter and repost the article. I do not know if the article was ever re-posted. (Reference: Fahim A. Knight; “Christmas—Jesus the Sun God: Lies, Deception and the Truth”).

Cheik Anta Diop in his book titled, “The African Origin of Civilization: Myth or Reality” stated, “Ancient Egypt was a Negro civilization. The history of Black Africa will remain suspended in air and can not be written correctly until African historians dare to connect it with the history of Egypt. In particular, the study of languages, institutions, and so forth, can not be treated properly; in a word, it will be impossible to build African humanities, a body African human sciences, so long as the relationship does not appear legitimate. The African historian who evades the problem of Egypt is neither modest nor objective, nor unruffled; he is ignorant, cowardly, and neurotic. Imagine, if you can, the uncomfortable position of a western historian who was to write the history of Europe without referring to Greco-Latin Antiquity and try that off as a scientific approach.” (Reference: Cheik Anta Diop; “The African Origin of Civilization: Myth or Reality”).

But what struck me about the Hall of Maat and Graham Hancock sites were that they had a body of scholars, scientist, social scientist, laypersons, etc., dedicated to investigating the history, culture and genealogy of ancient Egypt (Kemet). These scholars and researchers seemed to have one common thread relative to ancient Egypt (Kemet), which was disproving that this North East African nation was African (black) in genotypical’ and ‘phenotypical’ terms. Western historians, however, say that the word "Kemet" refers to the color of the soil of the land rather than its people. But, the word "Kemet" is actually an ethnic term being a derivative of the word "Khem" (Cham or Ham) which means "burnt" or "black." Ham, who was one of the three sons of Noah and the direct ancestor of the Egyptians, was black. The Bible, in the Old Testament, repeatedly refers to Egypt as the "Land of Ham" (i.e., Psalm 105:23, 27; 106:22). Regarding the ancient Egyptians, there is also considerable historical evidence, aside from the Holy Bible, that they were of Black or Negro origin. (Reference: http://www.theconservativevoice.com/arti...).

There appears to be an academic-led movement, amongst some Caucasian scholars in the United States and Europe, to use a new wave of technology and science which to reevaluate and re-access the genealogy of those who inhabited ancient Egypt (Kemet) by using the availability of DNA testing. (Reference: John G. Jackson; “Man, God, and Civilization”).

Thus,“According to the Bible the ancient Egyptians were descended from Ham through the line of Mizraim. Ham had four sons: Cush, Mizraim, Phut, and Canaan (Genesis 10:6). The name "Mizraim" is the original name given for Egypt in the Hebrew Old Testament. Many Bibles will have a footnote next to the name "Mizraim" explaining that it means "Egypt." The name "Egypt" itself actually comes to us from the Greeks who gave the Land that name (i.e. "Aegyptos" from the Greek). In addition to the name "Mizraim," the ancient Egyptians also referred to their land as "Kemet" which means "Land of the Blacks." (Reference: http://www.theconservativevoice.com/arti...).

This will allow a field of pure science to be the guiding force of re-determining past historical evidence which was once guided mainly by social science that allowed history as a discipline to interact in an interdependency manner with anthropology, archaeology, paleontology, sociology, etc., to validate past events. But according to this new wave of historical research methodology, scholars and scientist argue that it will allow for so-called more reliable objective research findings and provide us with definitive and substantiated evidence in order to tell us more about the original inhabitants of Ancient Egypt (Kemet), which was the original name of Egypt prior to the Greeks, Arabs, British, Assyrians, Turks, and the European invaders occupying and colonizing this North African nation. (Reference: Molefi Kete Asante; “Afrocentricity”).

Wikipedia online research source had this to say about DNA testing concerning Egypt (Kemet), it stated, “Blood typing and DNA sampling on ancient Egyptian mummies is scant; however, blood typing of dynastic mummies found ABO frequencies to be most similar to modern Egyptians and some also to Northern Haratin (Mauritania and Western Sahara—Black Moors) populations. ABO blood group distribution shows that the Egyptians form a sister group to North African populations, including Berbers, Nubians and Canary Islanders. DNA extraction (namely from the 12th dynasty) indicates multiple lines of descent, including sub-Saharan Africa, while the other lineages were not identified, but may be African in origin as well (according to Keita, 1996)”

Some of the most glorious and dynamic history evolved out of Egypt and many alien people and cultures have worked diligently to claim this nation, that has enlighten humanity in the realm of civilization falsely as their own. The historians have attributed the disciplines of architecture, physics, engineering, mathematics, medicine, religion, art, music, science, etc., all originated in ancient Egypt (Kemet) and no doubt this truth is indisputable. This writer, believes that most scholars will not be resistant to any new form of science that will lead us to a higher historical confirmation and evidentiary of scholarly proof in undertaking the ancient people who lived in Egypt, Africa. This writer desires to believe that both scholars and laypersons alike, perhaps could appreciate and somewhat be receptive to this ground breaking efforts of DNA research being applied to re-examining history and Egyptology. However, this writer after thoroughly reviewing Graham Hancock and Hall of Maat websites and the writings of the scholars who submitted articles for posting; He was not left convinced that it was the truth that these scholarly pioneers were pursuing. (Reference:Gerald Massey; “Ancient Egypt the Light of the World”).

This writer can not help, but to question the motive and integrity of these social scientist who are pushing this effort of pure science (DNA testing) as the ultimate determining factor, which to be used to reevaluate ancient Egypt (Kemet) in order to provide us with more definitive and factual information about the race and ethnicity of the pyramid builders. But is there an unspoken, covert and clandestine agenda other than being able to access and use present day technology to enhance the definitiveness of perceived past historical facts. This writer agrees that scientist, social scientist and scholars should be able to use all the available technology at their disposable in order to bring us closer to the genetic truth of the original Egyptians (Kemites). However, perhaps those who are pursing this new historical and scientific investigation type scholarship, which to definitively determine the race and ethnicity of the ancient people who lived in Egypt (Kemet) is bit in genuine and is looking to demystify the notion that these people were of a Negroid strain. (Reference: Cheik Anta Diop; “Civilization Or Barbarism: An Authentic Anthropology”).

This writer believes that the Afrocentric movement in a America had made serious inroads in the areas of promoting historical pluralism and multiculturalism and as a intellectual school of thought and it was they that had to be challenged by those who desired to maintain the status quo. This concept allowed African American scholars and black academicians such as Molefi Asante, John G. Jackson, Cheik Anta Diop, Chancellor Williams, IvanVan Sertima, Amos Wilson, Asa Hilliard, Kobi K. K. Kambon, John Henrik Clarke, Leonard Jefferies, Yosef Ben Jochannon, Frances Cress Welsing, Ishakamus Barashango, Naim Akbar, etc., to redefine history and view Africa as a subject rather than an object, as well as questioning the Eurocentric worldview. (Reference: Ameen Yasir Mohammed “Afrocentricity, Minus Al-Islam, Cheats: Exposing The Conspiracy to Rob African Americans of their Most Precious Heritage”).

Runoko Rashidi stated, “In the intense and unrelenting struggle to establish scientifically the African foundations of Egyptian civilization, the late Senegalese scholar Dr. Cheikh Anta Diop remains a most fierce and ardent champion. Dr. Diop (1923-1986) was without a doubt the world's leading Egyptologist and held the position of Director of the Radiocarbon Laboratory at the Fundamental Institute of Black Africa in Dakar, Senegal. In stating the importance of the work, Diop noted emphatically and early on that, the history of Black Africa will remain suspended in air and cannot be written correctly until African historians dare to connect it with the history of Egypt."

Rashidi goes on to state, “The solid range of methodologies employed by Dr. Diop in the course of his extensive Afro-Egyptian labors included: examinations of the epidermis of the mummies of Egyptian kings for verification of their melanin content; precise osteological measurements and meticulous studies in the various relevant areas of anatomy and physical anthropology; careful examinations and comparisons of modern Upper Egyptian and West African blood-types; detailed Afro-Egyptian linguistic studies and the corroboration of distinct Afro-Egyptian cultural traits; documents of racial designations employed by the early Africans themselves; Biblical testimonies and references that address the ancient Egyptian's ethnicity, race and culture; and the writings of early Greek and Roman travelers and scholars describing the physical characteristics of the ancient Egyptians.”

The advocators of DNA testing and the question of racial determination really have some serious house cleaning to do relative to racial identification and classification standards that were previously established in the United States (more prevalent during the Jim Crow Era 1896-1954)—The 1/8 rule was a standard racial assessment that the white status quo used to determine who would be classified as being black and white, was based on the variable of a person having 1/8 percent of African blood flowing through their veins (this was enough evidence to consider a person black). This writer does not think the 1/8 RULE has ever been appealed and rescinded by the United States Government and the scholars who used it to create HIS—STORY. This flawed classification of race designation be it defacto/dejure practice has never been officially recognized as being wrong and immoral; moreover, THE 1/8 RULE CLASSIFICATION MUST BE DEEMED RACIST and faulty and most of all unscientific. (Reference: Floyd B McKissick; “Three-fifths of a Man’)

Thus, these racist past and present, owe an apology to all of those that were adversely affected and denied Freedom, Justice and Equality because of the 1/8 Rule and this writer is old enough too have heard about this. We shall perhaps never know the total implications and the affect of this unjust racial classification system, had socially, politically and economically on people living in the United States, in particular and the world in general. This writer in reality, could end this topic of ancient Egypt (Kemet) by simple stating that there is little doubt that the original Egyptians (just based on physical appearance) had greater than 1/8 percentage Nubian African-black blood flowing thru their veins—end of discussion and this is not to discount the fact that there were other racial-ethnic miscegenation evidence pointing to a mix race—ancient Egyptian population. (Reference: Sterling Means: “Ethiopia & The Missing Link”).

This intellectual movement is quite bothersome to this writer, because it appears to be another sophisticated stratagem to once again relegate blacks to an inferior role and reposition Africa, in particular sub-Sahara Africa as the dark continent (gave nothing to civilization). No different than how past historians help set the stage for Africa to be raped and robbed by alien peoples and it justified slavery and the Transatlantic slave trade because of this “Dark Continent” myth; Yet, are these scholars hiding behind the newest and latest DNA historical technology, but their primary motivation is racism and the secondary motive is it more of a white supremacy smokescreen hidden under the guise of improving on ancient Egypt’s ethno-racial scholarship by heighten the evidentiary proof relative to getting closer to the truth, as it pertains to race, ethnicity and genealogy of the ancient Egyptians. The Egyptians were intellectual genius possessing the ability to erect the greatest structures ever built by man—the pyramids. These temples may have housed the dead or were the Egyptians teaching us something much more profound about immortality of the soul. These wonders of the world have baffled both social scientist and pure scientist alike for centuries. (Reference: John G. Jackson; “Introduction to African Civilizations and Walter Rodney: “How Europe Underdeveloped Africa’).

The geopolitical and ethno-racial identification and classification of ancient Egypt (Kemet) was thought to be originally inhabited by Nubian blacks. Thus, these new CSI type historians and scientist desire to use DNA testing to determine proof positive the racial identification of the ancient Egyptians. Popular thought and racial classification/identification had systematically categorized the human race in four distinct racial groupings—Negroid, Caucasoid, Mongoloid and, Australoid (this racial classification might-be somewhat outdated, but it set the racial classification standard) in which skeletal physicality were the definitive variable for racial indexing. For example, cranium structure, hair texture, jawbone structure—lips , nose, etc., were used to determine, which peoples, lands, and cultures would be designated and placed in the said four racial groupings.(Reference: Ivanvan Sertima; “The African Presence In Early Asia”).

Wikipedia the on-line free encyclopedia stated, “Studies performed to determine the population characteristics of ancient Egyptians have used various methods including examining craniometric pattern and variation of skeletal remains. A 2007 study which examined craniometric variation among ancient Egyptians of the predynastic and early dynastic periods found high levels of diversity but concluded that the formation of the Egyptian state was predominantly indigenous in development, with some, but limited migration from elsewhere. A craniofacial study by C. Loring Brace et al. concluded that; "The Predynastic of Upper Egypt and the Late Dynastic of Lower Egypt are more closely related to each other than to any other population" and that they show ties with North African, Somalian, European, Nubian and, more remotely, Indian populations, but not with Sub-Saharan Africans or populations from other continents. Anthropologist Shomarka Keita and geneticist Rick Kittles have criticized this study because of what they describe as "a socially constructed typological paradigm" in which Sub-Saharan Africans are treated as a monolithic, and biological African groups such as Nubians, Somalians and Egyptians are viewed essentially as non-African for having a craniometic pattern more similar to that of non-African populations.”

But from this unscientific, but agreed racial identification, a system of anthropology, archeology, and sociology were formed and began to validate the history, culture and civilization of past peoples and nations. What has always alarmed me, as a social scientist were certain geographical regions in Africa, in particular North East Africa (Egypt, Palestine, Ethiopia, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Somalia) were classified as Caucasoid; although many of these people were very dark skinned (black). But this racial and ethnic contradiction was strategically established by Great Britain, United States, France, Germany, Spain, etc., who desired to create a Eurocentric racial-ethno worldview, which to show forth superior racial kinship with a people and culture that has stood head and shoulders above other societies in the realm of civilization. Perhaps China is the only other society with an equal historical civilization in longevity and cultural advancement compliable to Egypt (Kemet). (Reference: Drusilla Dunjee Houston;” The Wonderful Ethiopians of the Ancient Cushite Empire”).

This writer has personally met North Africans and East Africans that were dark skinned and by United States racial taxonomy they would be considered on the surface black and African. Nevertheless, by western racial-ethnic classifications—they would be deemed white. The Arabs and the people that occupy Egypt (Kemet) today are not the biological or even ethno-kindred to the original inhabitants that lived and occupied ancient Egypt (Kemet) 10,000 years ago, they are a Johnnie-come-lately race. For example, the former Egyptian President Muhammad Anwar Sadat by United States racial standards would have been considered black. The present Saudi Kingdom Prince Bandar bin Sultan bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud would be considered black, both of them are from North East Africa. (Reference: Chancellor Williams; “Destruction of Black Civilization: Great Issues of a Race from 4500 BC to 2000 AD)

This writer does not accept the geo-political lines drawn which separates the so-called "Middle East" from the African continent; divided by the man made Suez Canal which serves as an artificial line of demarcation. Perhaps these scientists have no ulterior motives for pushing DNA analysis testing as the latest measuring instrument in the field of Egyptology; this writer doubt this contention because it has the words politically inspired written all over this movement. Or is it just another racist attempt to culturally denigrate blacks in the scheme of civilization and to once again propel themselves to superior status? Ancient Egypt (Kemet) has to be touted the EIGHTH WONDER OF THE WORLD and there is an intellectual war of ideas going on and I am quite sure there are a slew of scholars who are apologist and pundits in this DNA debate relative to Egypt (Kemet). (Reference: Bruce Bridges “Recapturing the African Mind).

These reactionary Egyptologist and DNA proponents have carried Professor Mary Lefkowitz, the author of “Not Out of Africa” argument to another level. Lefkowitz argued that Afrocentric scholars had exaggerated the black historical role in Egypt (Kemet) and created undocumented myths coupled by shoddy research methods and documentation. Lefkowitz attacked George G. M. James who perhaps wrote the Afrocentric intellectual treatise in 1954, titled, “Stolen Legacy”. Lefkowitz stated, “Perhaps the most influential Afrocentrist text is Stolen Legacy, a work that has been in wide circulation since its publication in 1954. Its author, George G. M. James, writes that the ‘term Greek philosophy, to begin with is a misnomer, for there is no such philosophy in existence’. He argues that the Greeks ‘did not possess the native ability essential to the development of philosophy.’ Rather, he states that “the Greeks were not the authors of Greek philosophy, but Black people of North Africa, The Egyptians. . . It is not hard to understand why James wishes to give credit for the Greek achievement to the Egyptians, even if there is little or no historical foundation for these claims. Like the other nationalistic myths, the story of a ‘Stolen Legacy’ both offers an explanation for past suffering and provides a source of ethnic pride.”(Reference: Mary Lefkowitz; “Not Out of Africa: How Afrocentrism Became an Excuse to Teach Myth as History.”

Quite obvious this writer disagrees with Professor Lefkowitz because her assessment and other scholars like her, desire to play up the so-called Semitic lineage and through faulty deductive reason they would like to even argue that the Ancient Egyptians were white and these traditional, Revisionist and reformist historical schools of thought have united behind DNA testing, as representing the last resort to rob ancient Egypt (Kemet) of an African origin, but the preliminary DNA testing wasn’t as conclusive as they expected, which resulted from the unavailability of physical evidence that has faded away with time. The DNA testing has verified overwhelmingly Nubian blood present in the Egyptian corpse and mummies and DNA testing has yet to disqualify the non-presences of African blood in the ethno-racial lineage of the Ancient Egyptians.

Even today the true Egyptian is not to be found in the cities but in the country sides and farmlands of Egypt. Most of the Egyptians in the cities carry a mixed ancestry of European and Asian, but mostly Asian from the immigration and invasions of various people into Egypt throughout the centuries. Very few people realize that Cleopatra was of Greek origin because the Greeks once ruled Egypt and she was descended from one of those Greek rulers. The true Egyptian found in the countryside, however, has dark brown to black skin and very pronounced Negro features. This is particularly true the further south one travels in Egypt. It was from the south that the original pharaohs and the people of Egypt settled the land. The original rulers and builders of Egyptian civilization were of completely Black or Negro origin.

This writer even read articles written by credible Masonic writers and historians such as Christopher Knight and Robert Lomas that had posted articles on the Hall of Maat and Graham Hancock sites, but intellectual racism, is in one sense, more dangerous because it sets the mental premise and gives meaning, rationale, validation, justification and serve as the foundation for the underlying principle that racism needs to rationalize its existence.

Lastly, from the http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/nod..., I received some valuable lessons and instructions from a blogger who goes by the name of Kats and this is what he left me with relative to my post titled, “Christmas—Jesus the Sun God: Lies, Deception and the Truth.”

“I have always believed that our understanding of the 'past' and 'future' plays the role of two wings of a bird (us), and only in good balance can we then fly where we want to go. So all efforts to elucidate and not compromise with the facts is valuable. Where it gets a bit uncomfortable is when we start getting ideological and tend to paint some facts with brighter colors and some in darker. It is important that more researchers like yourself write about the likelihood of incorrectness of Jesus bd to maybe encourage finding new innovative ways to dig for a true bd.”

“The need for knowing or yet better replacing it is its incorrectness and not because it is a 'pagan celebration'. If the latter is the reason, we can be sure the corrections won't end with bd. This is where we arrive at a juncture where what we think civilization is becomes crucial. All religions, spiritual belief systems, philosophies, theologies, theosophies, etc. are languages of mind, just like languages of mouth, and languages of heart (music) and are precious heritage of our civilization.”

“We have had enough of rough minded powerful leaders who ram thru nations and cultures and destroyed their language of mind, mouth, and heart which took them millenniums of hard work to create, and left them like cats with chopped off whiskers who can't tell which side is up which down. A truly irreparable damage to our civilization. We might have been a bit numbed up by western historians who put heavy emphasis on tool making in ranking civilizations. To me, millions of people around the world died during thousands of years in the process of figuring out which mushrooms are edible and nutritious without side effects, which plant roots have medicinal effects, which deep sea vegetations are good for us, is civilization.”

“That's why I think, did Egypt feed the world with civilization or China, is a question that can only take you to a wrong answer. We can appreciate and respect their contribution, but not the claiming ownership. No body owns civilization. Your description that what premises Dr. John Jackson might have been operating under makes sense, only if he doesn't fall into the same trap.”
I do not know if I have fell into that trap that Kats were referring to, but this writer knew that Graham Hamcock and the Hall of Maat forums were mixing truth with falsehood and in some cases was outright lying about the history and culture of ancient Egypt (Kemet) in order to covertly push their intellectual racist agenda. Some of these scholars even held doctorate degrees in various disciplines, but this writer could no longer sit quietly by while they pillage and plunder over African history. Someone will argue that Knight seem obsessed with the question of race and fail to recognize and acknowledge my core base, which is African, African American and all people of goodwill. This is my response to setting the historical record straight and to letting Graham Hamcock and the Hall of Maat forums know that THERE ARE EYES ON THEM.

Fahim A. Knight-EL Chief Researcher for KEEPING IT REAL THINK TANK located in Durham, NC; our mission is to inform African Americans and all people of good will of the pending dangers that lie ahead; as well as decode the symbolisms and reinterpret the hidden meanings behind those who operate as invisible forces, but covertly rules the world. We are of the belief that an enlighten world will be better prepared to throw off the shackles of ignorance and not be willing participants for the slaughter. Our MOTTO is speaking truth to power. Fahim A. Knight-EL can be reached at fahimknight@yahoo.com.

STAY AWAKE UNTIL WE MEET AGAIN,
Fahim A. Knight-El

red pill junkie's picture
Member since:
12 April 2007
Last activity:
31 min 43 sec

This is a sculpture found in the Louvre. it represents a squatting scribe.

What I see in this is not distinct African features. But on the contrary, the result of a "melting pot" of distinct ethnic groups. Incidentally, this is what I think will happen in the United States in less than a 100 years —and that ain't something to fear.

It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me...
It's all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!

Red Pill Junkie
_______________
@red_pill_junkie

fahim knight's picture
Member since:
22 December 2007
Last activity:
27 weeks 1 day
red pill junkie wrote:

This is a sculpture found in the Louvre. it represents a squatting scribe.

Could you please interpret this part of your statement; this part got by me.

Stay Awake Until Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-El

red pill junkie's picture
Member since:
12 April 2007
Last activity:
31 min 43 sec

My apologies for not explaining adequately.

The purpose was to illustrate why I'm skeptic of conferring 'negroid' racial features to Ancient Egyptians, by studying an actual original representation of one of them.

The ancient scribe depicted in that sculpture doesn't seem to be showing peculiar racial features of ANY kind. In fact, it could very well be mistaken for a modern Mexican. Why? because Mexicans are also a varied mix of several ethnic groups.

It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me...
It's all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!

Red Pill Junkie
_______________
@red_pill_junkie

fahim knight's picture
Member since:
22 December 2007
Last activity:
27 weeks 1 day

Kemet (Ancient Egypt) due to racial miscegenation by external nations and after many outside invasions from the Romans, Greeks, Turks, Arabs, Italians, and Phoenicians, etc. took on an entirely new racial identity and classification. This phenomena came much later in the history of Kemet, which we witness Kemet ethnically transition from a Nubian society into a lighter skinned mulatto people that resembled the Arab imposters who occupies modern Egypt today (they are not the original people). But they the Arabs are new people along with the religion of Islam they brought to Kemet. Now, the Zionist Jews have even further confused the ethnicity of these people in this equation who presently live in North Africa and the so-called Middle East as being Semitic (a mix race of Mediterranean region people) and languages, but fail to tell you that these people are Johnny-come-lately inhabitants of that region and has little kinship with original Nubians who occupied Kemet of yesterday (refer to “Destruction of Black Civilization” by Dr. Chancellor Williams).

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-El

red pill junkie's picture
Member since:
12 April 2007
Last activity:
31 min 43 sec

This phenomena came much later in the history of Kemet

Just how late are we talking about? a thousand years? the squatting scribe depicted in the statue is old Kingdom.

How far do we have to go back in time in order to find a 'pristine' African civilization, untouched by foreign influence?

It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me...
It's all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!

Red Pill Junkie
_______________
@red_pill_junkie

fahim knight's picture
Member since:
22 December 2007
Last activity:
27 weeks 1 day

All the evidence points to the Ancient Egyptians being black; not middle eastern and certainly not European.

10 reasons why the Egyptians were not "Caucasoid

1. The Dynastic race theory and the Hamitic Hypothesis have both fallen out of favor.. (See Ian Shaw, Oxford History Of Ancient Egypt)

2. The Egyptians therefore did not migrate from the North, and archaeological observations backs up more favored notions of mass migration from the south, due in part to a fertile Sahara and changing climatic conditions in the Nile and the Sahara.

3. Cranial analysis found that the predynastic Badari culture stretching from 5000 - 4000 BC., had most similarities to East African Teita tribes in Kenya, while Cranial studies of Naqada II found the closest similarities with ancient Nubian Sudan, and Somalia, and the Falaheen in Israel (due most likely to possessing substantial amounts of East African specific e3b since Fellaheen do not fit into a Middle Eastern or Mediterranean Cluster).."The Niger-Congo speakers, Congo, Dahomey and Haya, cluster closely with each other and a bit less closely with the Nubian sample ? both the recent and the Bronze Age Nubians ? and more remotely with the Naqada Bronze Age sample of Egypt, the modern Somalis, and the Arabic-speaking Fellaheen (farmers) of Israel. When those samples are separated and run in a single analysis as in Fig. 1, there clearly is a tie between them that is diluted the farther one gets from sub-Saharan Africa" - Brace

4. The 1rst Dynasty remains at the tombs in Abydos were assessed. What was found is that out of all the samples they clustered closest to Kerma (Nubian sample) than anyone else.

5. The Egyptians had tropical body plans, meaning their skeletal type indicates adaptation to a tropical environment. Note: Egypt is not in the tropics, so take this info as you will, but I will say that the closest tropical habitat to Egypt is sub-Saharan Africa."The raw values in Table 6 suggest that Egyptians had the ?super-Negroid? body plan described by Robins (1983). The values for the brachial and crural indices show that the distal segments of each limb are longer relative to the proximal segments than in many ?African? populations." - Zakrzewski

6. Ancient Egyptian language belongs to the Afro-Asiatic language phylum, which began in Africa. Also the fact that Ancient Egyptian is older than semitic (semitic is the only Afro-Asiatic language spoken outside of Africa), that makes Ancient Egyptian an African language by default. And its closest neighbor is not Semitic, there is much debate on that but most say Beja or Chadic resembles it closest based on genetic relationships in linguistics.

7. Continuity has been found to last from the predynastic of Egypt, well into the dynastic.. Meaning they virtually stayed the same and didn't immediately become an all out "mixed" super heterogeneous population until later. Whatever they were (Ethiopic/Eastern African) in the predynastic, they were well into the dynastic, which is later confirmed through Old Kingdom Giza remains, etc...

8. Mitochondrial DNA tests on modern Egyptians found an underlying ancestral lineage to East Africa.

9. Y Chromosomes found Genes native to Africa specifically (Haploids V, XI, and IV) and scarce outside of it, Egyptians have these in high frequencies, left over from the past and diluted due to admixture. Haplotype V is common in Berbers and is scarce outside Africa. Meaning two things, modern North Africans are mixed with Arab and are not Arab, and that the Egyptians were not Berbers butV, XI,and IV bearers of sub/supra-Saharan genes that had little to do with anyone outside of the continent.

10. Recent studies on Egyptian Y chromosomes have found close ancestral connections even between modern Egyptians and various other supra/sub-Saharan African populations.

"A review of the recent literature indicates that there are male lineage ties between African peoples who have been traditionally labeled as being ??racially?? different, with ??racially?? implying an ontologically deep divide.

The PN2 transition, a Y chromosome marker, defines a lineage (within the YAPþ derived haplogroup E or III) that emerged in Africa probably before the last glacial maximum, but after the migration of modern humans from Africa (see Semino et al., 2004)

This mutation forms a clade that has two daughter subclades (defined by the biallelic markers M35/215 (or 215/M35) and M2) that unites numerous phenotypically variant African populations from the supra-Saharan, Saharan, and sub-Saharan regions based on current data (Underhill, 2001)"

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-El

red pill junkie's picture
Member since:
12 April 2007
Last activity:
31 min 43 sec

Fahim, to me it's not an either/of answer. It's not like "If the Egyptians were not black Africans, then they necessarily had to be white Caucasoids".

Can't there be room for a middle ground?

Have you tried to understand what I've been saying? My point is that ancient Egyptians were a diverse mix of different ethnic groups, that got together for whatever reasons —possibly for the same reason we still see interracial unions in our time: because people can see past skin tones.

But then again, I don't understand this need to be linked to some ancient 'glorious' past, in order to justify some ancient lineage superiority —"when your ancestors were still hiding in caves, my ancestors were building great monuments". Aha... so?

As a Mexican, I'm certainly proud that foreigners take an interest in the many varied cultural manifestations displayed by the ancient inhabitants of my land. But that doesn't mean I can take a personal pride in the achievements of these people. That would be kind of lame, I'd rather brag about what *I* have accomplished.

I remember an excerpt from one of the Capitán Alatriste books written by Arturo Pérez-Reverte, as a comment made by a Skid row character regarding a time in history when lineage and descent was very important for a person's social importance: "My lineage starts with ME".

It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me...
It's all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!

Red Pill Junkie
_______________
@red_pill_junkie

fahim knight's picture
Member since:
22 December 2007
Last activity:
27 weeks 1 day

I do not think surveying the historical record and evaluating past evidence, is neither black supremacist nor white supremacist in scope, but if the evidence and the data draw us to a reasonable conclusion about certain aspect of history; how willing are we to accept certain outcomes, even if those finds go against the popular version of the truth? Or do we find comfort for the most part, based on our own cultural socialization process and relegate truth to cultural bias and stereotypes. For example, many Caucasians can not even phantom that the people of Kemet were Nubians and often this position is not based on any scholarly findings or intellectual outcomes, but their disposition is often driven by the raw emotions of racism, which is often rooted in a social structure.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight-EL

thefloppy1's picture
Member since:
1 May 2004
Last activity:
11 weeks 2 days

racism is not a plant......it is an animal. Being an animal it needs to be fed. If it is not fed it will die.

There are a small amount of people around the world, not many, that have reached a point in mind evolution that can no longer identify with any form of discord towards any other humans.

Understand these factors that are in the back of your mind that subtly influence your life and behavior:1)EGO 2)GREED 3)RELIGIOUS ISOLATION 3)TRADITIONALISTIC DOGMAS 4)SELF MONORITIZE.

Everybody needs to de-program and then re-program their brain without the above sh*t thats preventing the evolution of our species.

"Life can be whatever you want it to be, as long as you do what your told."
LRF.