Click here to support the Daily Grail for as little as $US1 per month on Patreon

News Briefs 30-05-2013

By red pill junkieon

This is the week I break the Internet >:)

Thanks to Rick, Susan, Darren, Graham, & all the members of the Sacred Order of Lucha Libre.

Quote of the Day:

“Sometimes, it is an appropriate response to reality to go insane.”

~Phillip K. Dick

red pill junkie
Agnostic gnostic, walking conundrum & metaphysical oxymoron (with emphasis in the 'moron' part), the mysterious RPJ leaves a double life: By day he serves as Grand Master of the International Sacred Order of Lucha Libre, but at night he pursues his life-long study of everything considered mysterious and/or 'paranormal' --a term he personally detests... When he's not exploring the web looking for his daily fix of Forteana, he can be found blogging, doodling, fooling around and offering his services as news administrator and writer at The Daily Grail. He also regularly participates in other websites and podcasts like Radio Misterioso and Where Did the Road Go? He impatiently awaits for the return of the mothership in Mexico City. absurdbydesign.com
Related

15 Comments

  1. Veitch’s renunciation
    An industry manufacturing and selling all manner of gear (in addition to publications, conferences, videos, podcasts, etc.,) to protect against world domination master plans and civilization destroying catastrophes is cashing in on the conspiracy movement’s incessant fear mongering. So, it’s no wonder Veitch is getting death threats. He’s breaking a hell of a lot of rice bowls with his renunciation.

    Veitch should shut up about his change of heart. He naively doesn’t seem to realize he’s taken on an entire industry by so publicly rejecting his former beliefs.

    1. Taking on an industry
      Yeah, it’s hard to read his motivations behind his decision to stay vocal about his beliefs. Perhaps is his way to seek atonement?

      What I found interesting about the article, is the amount of vitriol the guy received. He’s been found guilty of para-political heresy by his peers.

  2. Japanese Ghosts Prefer Cemetaries, Dark Forrests, And Castles!
    Red Pill

    Regardless, Japanese ghosts are much too polite to scare anyone without a reason related to honor; but, if you listen to them, they can be very informative! Asian ghosts usually don’t have bodies and, except in matters of revenge related to honor, Japanese ghosts are very friendly.

    So, don’t believe the rumors about the Prime Minister’s Residence! Prime Minister Abe is merely doing things slowly in order to save money. Like his father before him, he is very fiscally responsible.

      1. Yes, I Have Had Many Personal Experiences With Ghosts!
        Red Pill

        For the most part, I feel the presence of ghosts. Some of the ghosts communicate with me telepathicly and a few speak to me! I had a major argument with my mother after she died and we concluded that we really never liked each other very much! But, ghosts, except my mother’s, are very helpful to me.

      1. I have known a few people
        I have known a few people like Veitch – not just related to 911 but to other activist causes as well who suddenly about face even though there has been no change in the evidence that spawned their initial activism. People who invest in busting conspiracies for complex psychological reasons that have little to do with the actual facts of the case often experience a sort of “breakdown” and find themselves seeking psychological relief. It reminds me a lot of religious conversions and such – there is a moment of psychological crisis followed by a 180 from previous position. I have seen this happen in the ecological movement too. It’s like the person can no longer find “what he was looking for” in the original stance probably because what he was looking for actually had nothing to with the facts of things, and some people can stand only so much cognitive dissonance before they snap.
        I had a close friend in a movement to stop aerial spraying of Agent Orange on Ozark forests – this was back in the days when they had not shifted over to somewhat less poisonous herbicides. One day just out of the blue he decided he no longer believed in what he was doing. Nothing had changed with regard to the data – he just had some kind of nervous breakdown or something. His subsequent life hinted strongly at some kind of mental instabilities, and he had a difficult time of it in later life for a variety of psychological reasons.
        The most interesting experience I ever had along these lines was back in the early 1980’s within a prominent environmental group. We had this member – an older fellow – who joined up for reasons none of us could quite figure out. He didn’t seem to know much about environmentalism, but he was a very pleasant fellow who took copious notes and was quite courteous and a bit charming. He was widowed, and we figured he was lonely and looking for some social interaction perhaps. Then one day he starts having “second thoughts” about environmentalism and became vocal about it but in his usual courteous fashion. This just added to our puzzlement over this fellow. The one of the parents of one of members informed us that this guy was retired FBI – a little biographical fact he had never graced us with.

        1. My God, what took you so long??
          Kidding 😉

          I’m not sure I agree with your statement that ‘the data hasn’t changed’. The article clearly states that during the making of the documentary Veitch was free to grill the ‘counter-experts’ who presented him with evidence of how the WTC’s fall was not the result of a controlled explosion. That’s what seemed to have triggered his change of heart. And after that he started to question the other aspects of the Parapolitical movement that he might have chosen to overlook or underestimate back when he was still on ‘zealot mode’ –i.e. the deep Anti-Semitic currents beneath their discourse.

          What the article does illustrate however, and you seem to be in agreement, is that his bias had been shaped way before the encountered the 9/11 movement. Most of the time our allegiance with philosophies & social movements weighs more heavily with our emotional responses, than with the objective reasons (or lack thereof) promoted by said philosophies & or movement.

          It’s because of our emotions that we may be more inclined to believe or disbelieve the evidence presented to you.

  4. Nobody has explained how the
    Nobody has explained how the third building WTC7 fell short of controlled demoliton. The two big towers are events so covered up in debris that is has always been too foggy to determine what happened.
    I would also like to direct your attention to the fact that their explanations about the towers were quite lame. I would say this guy just folded his tent.
    It is also important to remember that the evidence of an inside job is so extensive with so much detailed evidence elsewhere that it is not even necessary to include “controlled demolition.” That could be thrown out entirely, and the evidence for insider enablement especially with regard to Cheney and Rumsfeld that remains would be voluminous. If this guy was basing his theory entirely on controlled demolition then he had a very shallow knowledge about the event in the first place.

    “Where was Cheney on 911?”
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AikIALXwSmI

    “Where Was Rumsfeld on 911”
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Izr2QuhHzWQ

    Even these two bits of evidence are just part of a huge incriminating pile of stuff that collectively exposes the op for what it was. Anyone who has absorbed it all cannot help but conclude this was an insider thing. Of course, not all “truthers” are well informed.

    1. Veitch
      Why don’t you write to him, and ask him to explain his reasons to change his opinion?

      Let me also ask you: have you consider the possibility that you could be wrong? and if conclusive evidence that was to your satisfaction surfaced disproving your ideas about 9/11, how would that affect your world-view?

      1. Man, I have been looking at
        Man, I have been looking at this for 12 years. I have read everything from all angles backwards, forwards, and upside down. I have heard all the countervailing arguments in detail. There is so much evidence supporting the insider theory that any jury would convict I am sure. This is not “subtle” or “gray area” stuff, but thudding evidence. Of course, there needs to be a hearing again in the first place. Bush and Cheney held off an inquiry for a year on the grounds that it “would interfere with the war on terror,” but finally we had a kangaroo court with intimidated witnesses and all manner of skullduggery which in itself demonstrated that Cheney & Co were quite insecure about it all and with good reason let me tell you. Technically Cheney and Rumsfeld should be in prison as traitors. On the most purely technical definitionb of “traitor” they are traitors.
        One thing to note here – the army of shills online hired to protect the government’s story usually want to stick to the tower collapses because those are essentially unsolvable. FEMA was prepositioned the night before at the Towers to get control of any incriminating evidence, and then Giuliani made sure all forensic evidence at the third tower was hauled off and melted down before any serious forensics could be performed. That was one of the most impostant crime scenes in history, and there was almost no forensic evidence to work with. The forensics people were tearing their hair out over this, but Giuliani and NYC had control of the evidence technically and could do what they wanted, so the shills know that nothing will ever come of those discussions ultimately. There isn’t any evidence other than photographic and a few choice beams that were cherry picked to have been away from the thermite and explosions. There is of course thermite and thermate evidence, but there isn’t enough there to say anything definitive. In a new inquiry of course all of the existing collapse evidence would be considered, and it would be quite telling as part of an overall pattern.
        This shills don’t want to discuss WTC7 collapse – the third one late in the day because the video footage so obviously shows a controlled demolition. The WTC7 collapse footage was never shown on major networks.

        A new inquiry might be most fruitful if witness protection was guaranteed, and we could hear testimony from more witnesses and even participants. but none of this would happen under Obama. Obama is pretty much directed and “handled” by the same network that does false flag ops.
        There is large momentum that has developed around 911 disclosure over the years, and I believe we are near a tipping point, so we are going to see some serious trickery and attempts to misdirect and deflect. Half of everyone I know has realized that 911 was highly fishy at the very least. Half of New Yorkers think 911 was an inside job. There are people sweating I am sure.

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxycV4fNPnQ

        Really though 911 has been “busted.” Enough people now know how it went down that the damage has been done to reputations. and we know better what to look for in false flags. You can be “convicted” even though you have not been sent to prison. In a sense, the perpetrators are in “prison” if they have any conscience at all.

        Bonus video for comic relief. This is Tucker Carlson interviewing Professor Steven Jones who just wants to show a clip of the WTC 7 collapse. Carlson jumps through hoops to keep the footage from airing. The major network’s military/industrial sponsors are still utterly terrified of the WTC 7 collapse footage, and with good reason. It very convincingly shows a controlled demolition:
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGNjqYTMK4E

          1. No, the first two years I was
            No, the first two years I was fence sitting because there had not been enough research to say one thing or another. It was only after some years that the op came into focus for me and millions of others I might add.

            There is an astounding amount of information about 911 on the net now. People only casually interested in 911 have no idea how much excellent information is available now on the internet. It is possible to flow chart the whole thing with actions, names, and timing. There is no doubt whatsoever that it was an inside job. I have always thought it was fateful that an op like 911 happened about the time the internet really took off with high speed connections being widespread. In a sense, the internet cut its eye teeth on 911. It was a great test for the power of the net to truly share and cross correlate information.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mobile menu - fractal