What is the Crux of Being here in Time/Space??? Why Be??? What is being other than knowing you are able to think??? Why do we seek to protect the thinking form from destruction after it has thought something? What is thinking but reviewing actions to maintain the vehicle for future leveraging of the elementals of existence? Why must one be here? We seem to examine our being to become more. As we become more our vehicle erodes. As time passes the vehicle no longer can sustain the means of thinking and we slowly pass into the void. Others pick up our thoughts and and carry parts of it forward and it goes on and on. But is this only an illusion? There seems to be a distant thinker in the mix —one that drives our very being from the darkness. It is like a program that determines exactness and procedure for leveraging the elements of this information packed realm we call living. There seems to be a lot of automatic means of moving us through this realm of being. The thinking part of us seems to be in for a ride. We ride the light of this realm where everything is automatically moving into new data constantly. There is no going back under the same conditions, only forward where change is taking place with new aspects to ponder with our mind or our thinking part of this experience. Our future depends upon a proper or positive process of determining what aspects to use in the mix of past data for future leveraging of trends and conditions. The Crux of being seems to depend upon something that maintains some form of constancy that we can maintain the information float in a burgeoning echelon over the chaos potential. If chaos can rise, we are destroyed or move to a higher echelon of existence or thinking in a new environment. It is all information manipulation on our part and that of the system within which we dwell. It is always becoming.
The Crux of Being involves a multifaceted means of existence. Each part interacts with its other parts. We are parts of the whole that must be present in order to interact and perceive existence. Otherwise we do not exist. Yet, we are one collective and parts of us lose our vehicles but our knowledge interweaves with the knowledge of our other parts. We should love one another as we love ourselves for the other is us.
Being Love
"We should love one another as we love ourselves for the other is us."
The question is, how to love others who embody what one has oneself rejected and who espouse preferences that are far from our own, especially when their preferences impinge on our own sense of harmony...
The Snake Bits its Tail...
Indeed you are correct and when you look at the other, you will see yourself in their eyes...and they in yours...we are here together and who will seek to unite our being???
No one
No-one
So the answer must be to drop all personal preferences and accept the Universal will. To love is to have no free will.
free will......?
the first law of this universe is free will. The universe would calapse without it.
The choices made with the free will are the important part. When love abounds, the choices are right and good for all, but without a "knowing" of connection with all and how a personal choice always effects all, wrong choices are made with undesirable results for the many.
Many thoughts are made in a nano-second. The choice is the action taken on a given thought. The result of that action is either good or bad depending on intent or knowledge of rebound effect.
The vibration of complete love is almost as high as light so to raise your vibration to that state is to experience euphoria. Imagine exsperiencing this reality in that state continually. It is possible through the choices you make.
"Life can be whatever you want it to be, as long as you do what your told."
LRF.
Dear floppy,
So good to see a post from you again, and hope it means you have permanent internet access again. I've missed your wisdom and your unique spelling!
Best regards, Kathrinn
no...not yet
and all not well with "friend". When a few uncertain aspects are delt with I will contact you. Thanks.
"Life can be whatever you want it to be, as long as you do what your told."
LRF.
got lost?
Hello floppy1, I missed your commentary.
As for the jargon, sometimes it is easier for small communities to give a random name to a complicated thing, so they can talk about it. A shorthand.
Other times this is use to snow the general public.
[[Begin boring example]]
Some years go I worked in a group that made computer related things. We designed a part that was named "Spock", for no particular reason. Other parts were named "Kirk", and "Sarek", and "McCoy", just to give names to these parts.
[[Ebd boring exmaple, maybe]]
That is where jargon comes from. It made our conversation inside the group much easier. Instead of saying "the thingy that has 32 bits and the 32-bit-barrel-shifter, unless we decide to change it to 64-bit", a convenient shorthand is to call it "Spock".
That is all fine, it works within the group.
It is when the group decides to impose their jargon on the rest of the world, that problems arise.
A question for everyone, who does not understand the term "snow job" ?
----
if everything is under control, you are not going fast enough (Mario Andretti)
it's not how fast you go, it's who gets there first
twain...
I'm sure many are familuar with this aspect of imaging sofware on computers.......twain stands for "thing without an interesting name". Geeks and their funny ways...haha.
"Life can be whatever you want it to be, as long as you do what your told."
LRF.