The speed of light
Posted by daydreamer at 13:18, 23 Sep 2011Big news today - the universal constancy of the speed of light looks threatened by something other than theory.
See:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-enviro...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-enviro...
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20...
This is going to be huge if it is confirmed.
I imagine this will be jumped on as another colossal mistake in science, but in the same vein as I agree'd about the hypocrisy in scepticism I would recommend caution to anyone tempted to use this that way - this could be much more exciting than just that.
Any temptation to suddenly declare the speed of light not the maximum universal speed, or not a constant, plays a game by forgetting all the thousands of different experiments that say it is. I guess this is why travel in different dimensions seems to be one of the main contenders for the possible answer. That explains both sets of data instead of opting to explain one at the expense of the other.
So have we just found our first objective evidence of travel in extra dimensions?
- daydreamer's blog
- Login or register to post comments




Comments
12 April 2007
5 min 21 sec
Can this experiment be replicated in other facility?
It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me...
It's all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!
Red Pill Junkie
18 September 2007
4 hours 3 min
Nor was the "speed of gravity" problem ever really solved to my satisfaction anyway. There were empirical experiments suggesting that gravitational relationships between two objects "updated" as the objects changed position relative to each other and did so at a rate far in excess of the speed of light.
There is also intriguing evidence that so called "ESP" propagates at a speed far in excess of the speed of light.