I predicted the content of the Gospel of Judas

The Gospel of Judas is the best birthday present I've ever received. The text of Judas' long-lost scripture was published one day after I turned 48 years old, and it is almost everything I could have hoped it would be. Widely regarded as the most important archaeological discovery of the last 60 years, this lost scripture from the earliest days of Christianity had lain buried in Egyptian dust for over 1700 years. I had been on pins and needles ever since last summer's press release announced its impending publication, because I knew my 18 years of research into early Christianity would be put to the test by the unveiling of this new document. My research predicted that if any more lost scriptures from the earliest days of Christianity ever surfaced, they would contain text supporting the binary soul doctrine and the co- Messiahship of Judas Thomas. This new gospel does just that.

For almost two decades, I have supported the unpopular position that the original form of Christian theology revolved around the ancient binary soul doctrine (BSD), a once-world-wide belief that human beings possess two spiritual components, both a soul and a spirit, which are in danger of dividing apart at death. In my book The Lost Secret of Death, I delineate depth how this ancient belief is reflected in modern psychology's distinction between the conscious and the unconscious, or the left brain and the right brain, and I also demonstrate how the ancient idea of soul-division elegantly accounts for the majority of afterlife phenomena reported today, from deathbed visions, ghosts, and poltergeists to near-death experiences and past-life regression. BSD cultures around the globe believed that the afterdeath division of the soul and spirit was the worst possible fate, but that it was not inevitable and could be avoided if one took appropriate measures.

The newly recovered Gospel of Judas contains this same belief system. In passages 67-68 and 122-123, this recovered gospel specifically declares that human beings possess both soul and spirit, and that these two components of the self divide apart at death. This gospel also agrees with the BSD that the human spirit is immortal and never dies, while the human soul is vulnerable and can die. It also agrees that those whose souls and spirits divide at death are damned, while those whose souls and spirits stay together at death are blessed. All in all, the postmortem theology of the Gospel of Judas reflects remarkable alignment with the binary soul doctrine.

The Gospel of Judas also provides substantiation for my argument that Jesus and Judas were equal partners in a dual or binary Messiahship. In my book Original Christianity : A New Key to Understanding The Gospel of Thomas and Other Lost Scriptures, I pointed out that the ancient Jewish ritual sacrifice of Yom Kippur was a precise reflection of the BSD's vision of the afterdeath fates of the soul and spirit. Two identical goats were brought to the sacrifice, and like the spirit that goes on to reincarnate after death, one goat would be allowed to go free, while the other would be put to death, just like the soul that goes on to heaven or hell after death. I then noted that the Biblical report of Jesus and Barabbas was also strikingly similar to this Yom Kippur ritual. Two men were brought before Pontius Pilate, and just like the identical goats of Yom Kippur, they too seemed to have been virtual twins. Both had the same name, the same title, the same history, and the same status. And just like on Yom Kippur, one of them was randomly allowed to live and the other sacrificed, even though both were saddled with a similar burden of blood guilt. The apparent connection between the BSD, the Yom Kippur ritual, and the story of Jesus and Barabbas also seemed to provide support for the ancient belief in the Syrian and Indian churches that Jesus' brother Judas Thomas was in fact not only His biological twin, but also His co-Messiah, who also performed great miracles and, seemingly, also rose from the dead.

As everyone expected, the Gospel of Judas supports the ancient hypothesis of a secret partnership between Judas and Jesus, but it goes much farther than that, and actually indicates the existence of the sort of co-Messiahship I described in Original Christianity. This newly recovered scripture describes Judas as Jesus' closest intimate friend and ally, the most holy of all the disciples and the only one who truly and fully understood His teachings. In one remarkable passage where Jesus challenges His disciples to prove they are ‘perfect' enough to stand before Him, only Judas is able to do so, suggesting that Judas is, on some level, on an equal par with Jesus Himself. Indeed, in this newly unearthed text, Judas is transfigured into a radiant cloud just the way Jesus was in Matthew 17:1-5, suggesting for the second time in this lost gospel that Jesus and Judas shared a similar divinity. According to this scripture, Judas turned Jesus over to the authorities at Jesus' own request. In handing him over, the text suggests, Judas not only performed the highest service to his master, and not only facilitated Jesus' redemption of humanity, but essentially sacrificed himself right alongside Jesus in the process, voluntarily becoming the most loathed man in human history. Just as I claimed a year ago in Original Christianity, there were not one but TWO men who sacrificed themselves to save humanity. It is no surprise to historians that Judas' gospel presents this view, because the ancient Christian apologist Irenaeus of Lyon briefly mentioned Judas' scripture around 180 AD. However, it is a surprise to the world that this ancient scripture links this perspective to the binary soul doctrine, just as I did in Original Christianity the year before Judas' gospel was made public. Written around the same time as the Biblical gospels, Judas' gospel demonstrates that a significant portion of the earliest Christian community viewed Judas not as a traitor at all, but as a hero on par with Jesus Himself, just as I claimed in Original Christianity. This gospel also declares that Judas would eventually rise, as Jesus did, to an exalted position of honor and authority in heaven. If in fact this is the same Judas Thomas who went on to found the church in India and write the Gospel of Thomas , that prophecy would indeed seem to have been fulfilled.

For the last 18 years, my books have advanced the hypothesis that Christianity originally revolved around the binary soul doctrine, and that Jesus and Judas Thomas were co-Messiahs who worked in concert, each sacrificing themselves in different ways to save humanity. Today's unveiling of the long-forgotten Gospel of Judas contains powerful evidence that my line of research has been on the right track.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
kennc's picture
Member since:
2 March 2005
Last activity:
5 years 18 weeks

Peter

The specifics is what the text will supply. The probable Gnostic perspective of the Gospel of Judas, as well as, its general perspective of Judas has been known. Gnostic beliefs are no secret and the Gospel of Judas is a typical Gnostic text. What we have now, at long last, is textual evidence!

What do you think?

kennc

Peter_Novak's picture
Member since:
1 May 2004
Last activity:
5 years 1 week

The Gospel of Judas is important for two reasons. One, it contains new evidence that the early Church taught the binary soul doctrine, and two, it portrays Judas not just as the most special and advanced of Jesus' disciples, but as a holy, divine, and almost equal partner to Jesus. Now, there is one precedent to this. In all of early Christian literature, there is only one other instance in which one of Jesus' disciples is portrayed as being His equal or near-equal, and that is found in the Syrian/Indian tradition about the Apostle Thomas, or Judas Thomas, who wrote the Gospel of Thomas, and who was thought to be Jesus' biological twin brother and co-Messiah. Now we find a second gospel that says the same thing, that a disciple named Judas is his equal or near-equal partner. Obviously from these two recovered texts we learn that significant portions of the early church believed that Judas and Thomas were the same man, and this Judas Thomas was a co-Messiah alongside Jesus.

If one twin died and the other lived, that would also explain why the legend has persisted that Jesus survived and went on to sire a family line, such as has been argued in Holy Blood Holy Grail and The Da Vinci Code.

- Peter

kennc's picture
Member since:
2 March 2005
Last activity:
5 years 18 weeks

Peter_Novak

Much Gnostic literature has survived and they weren't the only ones who taught Binary Soul Doctrine. It has been known that the Gospel of Judas was a Gnostic Gospel that potrayed Judas in a very favorable light. Judas was a common name! So, let's not make assumptions about Judas being Judas Thomas. James was Jesus' biological brother according to scripture, not Thomas. The twin theory derives much later as a result of references to Thomas as Didaemus. Didaemus could mean twin; but, it doesn't have to mean twin. Furthermore, twin of whom? Da Vinci played on this theme in the 'Last Supper'; but, other painters of the same period played on it also. The idea that Judas was Jesus' most competent follower who was obeying Jesus, if there ever was a Jesus, is also a centuries old tradition. What we have now is a text that clarifies what some early Christians thought about Judas. In the context, let us not forget that Pontius Pilot was a garden variety corrupt official who could have been bribed to fake a crusifiction and his corrupt nature is documented. There is no record of him ever mentioning Jesus!

What do you think?

kennc

the shadow's picture
Member since:
24 June 2004
Last activity:
4 years 35 weeks

that if all this really happened, then Jesus and Judas were a pair of sickos.
With death wishes.
Where does it take the church?
I was taught about Judas going to hell.He was the only person in the world that we knew for certain who went to hell.
And it also means that Jesus chose his death, it was not pre-ordained for him by god the father.
All his whining about what was going to happen to him from Palm Sunday on,is sickening if he chose to die this way.
No wonder the church tried to hide it for years.
Well done.

shadows

Peter_Novak's picture
Member since:
1 May 2004
Last activity:
5 years 1 week

My Bible says that anyone who repents his sin is forgiven.

In Matthew 26:25, Jesus first informs Judas that he will betray Him, and then orders him to do so in Matthew 26:50. In John 13:27, Jesus also orders Judas to betray him, and then in John 13:31-32 Jesus explains that what Judas was about to do was a good and necessary task that would glorify God. In Matthew 27:3-4, Judas repents his act, thereby guaranteeing his forgiveness by God. Mankind has never forgiven Him, but according to Christian doctrine, his repentance assured his forgiveness by God. One could argue that Judas committed suicide and thereby lost his salvation, but that version of Judas' death is seriously in question. In its present form the Bible describes two mutually exclusive versions of Judas' death. In Matthew 27:5, we read that Judas "went away and hanged himself", but in Acts1:18 we read instead that "Judas bought a field; there he fell headlong, his body burst open and all his intestines spilled out." In Matthew, the priests buy the "Field of Blood" after Judas' death, but in Acts, Judas buys it himself before he dies, and somehow they both buy it with the same reward money Judas reportedly received from betraying Jesus.

In addition to these two versions of Judas' death, another early Christian scripture that was widely circulated in the first century included yet another version of Judas' death, in which he was run over by a wagon. Thus, while we cannot know which if any of these reports were accurate, we do know that, for some reason, three different versions of Judas' death were being circulated among the faithful in the first century. Why? Why would they resort to fabricating reports of Judas' death? The question answers itself — because, very early on in the nascent church, when all the original apostles were still alive, someone in authority apparently wanted the public to believe that Judas was dead. Why so? Perhaps because that was the only way this particular scapegoat could hope to walk away.

Judas did not betray Jesus. He helped him. Jesus was unable to fulfill His destiny without someone willing to do the job Judas did. Without Judas to orchestrate a peaceful nighttime arrest of Jesus, the arrest would have had to occur in the daytime, which would have caused a huge riot in the city. That riot would have ruined everything. Instead of just Jesus dying, a whole mass of people would have died that day, and Jesus' story would have been buried under the historical report of a political riot and uprising. Instead of his followers going on to found a religion in Jesus' name, all those followers would probably have been killed or arrested in the rioting, and Christianity would never have been born.

There wasn't just one man who was sacrificed that day, but two — Jesus and Judas. Like the Yom Kippur ritual, one was killed while the other became the hated scapegoat who was allowed to wander away in shame. Consider this — Judas voluntarily became the most hated man in all of human history, and he did it at the request of Jesus, and as a result of what he did, according to Christian theology, mankind's salvation was effected. Is that not a sacrifice deserving of honor?

- Peter