Chemtrail Source Material - Coal Ash

"For the last two decades the source material for chemtrails has been a mystery. Finally, the apparent ‘perfect’ element base material of chemtrails sprayed from airplanes—both government and commercial—that causes blanket clouds and welsbach reflective materials in the atmosphere, has been identified. It’s coal fly ash wastes from coal burning power plants!"

Note: Commercial jets do not spray chemtrails. KC type military tankers usually in all white livery do the spraying.

Jupiter Ascending

Like the lead character in the movie Jupiter Ascending, our planet Jupiter had multiple “instantiations.” Jupiter lost the honored position of inner-most gas-giant planet orbiting around our nascent sun, but gained it back again after the tumultuous collisions associated with the cannibalization of our twin sun’s planets.

In the Enuma Elish, our twin sun is called Lahmu (“hairy, muddy” ala Esau) and its gas giant companion is called Lahamu. It formed first, but according to the Egyptian version of the Creation Story, this sun was “sickly” and was replaced by a “Glorious Eye.” This second star is called Anshar (“sky axle” ala the larger and smoother Jacob) in the Enuma Elish, and its gas giant companion is called Kishar. Despite its size and seniority, Kishar (Jupiter) was eventually eclipsed in status by the coming of Anu (Neptune).

In the Enuma Elish, Kingu (Uranus) appears almost out of nowhere to replace Anu in the “firstborn” position, i.e., innermost orbit of the extant planets. He also scandalously receives the sole favor of Tiamat. The Enuma Elish portrays indignation that Tiamat should be joined to this interloper, and exults in the calling of Marduk to challenge him. It was one thing for Anu to have earlier "usurped the throne" of his father Kishar, but the coming and anointing of Kingu (by adoption of Tiamat) was something quite different.

The ultimate downfall of first Anu (Neptune) and then Kingu (Uranus) allowed Kishar (Jupiter) to reclaim the status of “firstborn” (nearest to the sun) under a new name, Nudimmud (Ea), who is strangely called “the begetter of his fathers.” In other words, he had preceded both Anu and Kingu. Nudimmud was the new identity of Kishar re-born! Although this makes little sense as a human genealogy, it is coherent in terms of cosmology.

The Enuma Elish (On-Line Translation):

In Egyptian myth, the god Osiris was killed after returning to the West from his conquest of the East (as Uranus had moved in its own journey of ascendency within the binary star system). Osiris was still a comparatively young god, and only in his 29th regnal year when he was tragically assaulted. There are two versions of the event. In one, Osiris suffered numerous blows in an open field and his was body divided into 12 parts. In the other, he is tricked at a banquet into lying down in a coffin, which was then sealed and set adrift on the sea. This latter tale reflects the final prone state of the surviving “torso” of Uranus as it drifted toward an outer (less prestigious) orbit in the solar system.

The Enuma Elish blames the lucky mishap on Uranus (that is, on the Osiris planet Kingu) and its controversial “marriage” to the goddess (Tiamat). However, alternate formulations of the cosmology make Marduk/Apophis the villain and Osiris a blameless king that nobly sacrificed himself for the “salvation” of the Earth and earthlings. It was the body of Uranus that was broken for us, in that a portion of that planet was said to have formed the new planet Earth. Uranus enjoyed a partial/symbolic resurrection when Neptune was struck by the wounded Marduk and was therefore bumped into an even wider orbit. Eventually, Uranus was able to take up an orbit inside that of Neptune.

In the related Myth of Zu, the crafty Zu (Kingu/Uranus) steals the crown of Enlil (Saturn/Lahamu/Mummu) while he was bathing. This echoes the loss of Saturn’s status as the “firstborn” gas-giant in the older of the two twin solar systems. In fact, Saturn was quite possibly the first planet in the combined system. The subjugation of Saturn to Jupiter and the usurpation of the “firstborn” status by Uranus (from both Saturn and Jupiter) would have represented a major “coup” within the early solar system and in the annals of cosmology. In the Zu version of the myth, it appears that Uranus (Zu/Kingu) had performed a "Saturn-jumping" prior to performing a "Jupiter-jumping." And the chaotic nature of the Saturn-jumping may have become a catalyst for the events that followed.

With the eventual "defeat" of Kingu (Uranus) and dismemberment of Marduk, Jupiter regained the central and controlling "Nibiru" position in the solar system (near the fateful place of the “crossing,” i.e. spot of our solar system’s defining collision). However, the title of firstborn was fleeting. After the massive impact between Uranus and Marduk, rocky inner planets were born. By virtue of landing closest to the sun, the new planet Mercury (a remnant of Marduk) assumed the honorary title of “firstborn” among the sons of the Sun.

Scientists are perplexed that volatile compounds such as sulfur and potassium can still be detected on the surface of Mars. These should not have survived the disaster that stripped the planet's mantle almost down to its iron core. However, the collision in question did not occur close to the sun, but in the vicinity of the Asteroid Belt. What’s more, we are informed by the ancient accounts that the fiery post-impact Marduk careened first toward the outer solar system (even “alongside” Uranus) where it then “avenged” Saturn (his own feeding-brother from the twin solar system) by striking its “murderer,” Neptune. There was evidently time for the vapors to flash-freeze as a completely spent Marduk/Apophis was propelled back again and became the planet Mercury - a suffering serpent wound tightly around the turning pole of the sun, and all for the benefit of the Earth and mankind.

The Enuma Elish concludes by stating:

“Let them [the honorary titles of Marduk] become memorials and let the first human being recite them.”

Additional References:

Previous blog in the series:

Next blog in the series:

Index of blogs in the series:

This blog is an excerpt from "A Twisted History: Genesis and the Cosmos" -

Heading West of Eden

Our sun almost certainly originated within an open star cluster called Messier 67 (M67). Curiously enough, M67 is located to the East of our present location in the constellation of Cancer. More specifically, it is on the foot of Cancer that crushes the head of the adjacent constellation Hydra the serpent.

Image: “A Serpent (Hydra) Under the Foot (M67) of Cancer”
Credit/Source: Bruce L. Gary,

The stars of M67 are closest in age to our sun than any other group in the galaxy, and also uniquely similar in spectral characteristics. 88 stars in the M67 cluster have been studied in some detail over a period of many years. One is even billed as a near duplicate of our own sun in terms of age, mass and chemical composition. It also has a planet.

Based on the most recent estimates, our sun may have been among the first stars of its generation to be birthed in the M67 cluster. It would also have been one of the first to leave. The Earth is now 2,500 light-years distant from the “Garden of Eden” in M67. It was clearly expelled with considerable force. And, of course, there is no turning back! To have remained in the cluster would have just as certainly led to violent and repeated destruction. There is evidence that a nearby supernova explosion occurred within the first million years of our solar system’s existence, and within a distance of only about two light-years away. This explosion injected radioactive material into our emerging planetary system, which has now been detected through isotope analysis of the oldest meteorites that have fallen to Earth.

The Allende Meteorite:

Stars greater than about 1.4 times the mass of our sun “go supernova” and their collapsing cores turn into neutron stars which can produce pulsars that emit focused beams of radioactive material like “flaming swords that flash back and forth.” The Genesis narrative indicates that at least one neutron star (or even a black hole) was responsible for creating a hostile local neighborhood for our early solar system. Red giant stars (“cherubim”) would also have jeopardized the satety of our young solar system by threatening to go supernova or with their cosmic ”ram butting” (a connotation of the Hebrew word cherub).

Image: “Flaming, Flashing Sword of a Neutron Star”
Credit: NASA

The explanation for our eviction given in Genesis is that Eve partook of forbidden fruit (knowledge of “good and evil”) and gave it to Adam. In cosmological terms, the gas-giant planet (Jupiter) of Adam’s solar system captured a planet (Saturn) from the opposite (“serpent”) solar system and presented it as a gift to Adam. Our solar system was a binary (“dual”) solar system, however it was not one that remained that way, but merged somewhat catastrophically into a monolithic solar system. One system cannibalized the other, and was actually “tempted” to do so.

It is the “serpent” who is said to have accosted Eve. Within a crowded nebula of expanding red giant planets, exploding supernovae, and concommitant white dwarfs, the young suns were driven into closer contact with one another and this inevitably led to “enmity.” It wasn’t the serpent’s fault, per se, but he took the fall, so to speak. Consistent with this, the serpent is depicted, not as guarding his fruit, but actually trying to give it away. In time, the same bullies that pushed the twin suns together also forced them apart and sent our solar system hurtling into the unknown.

Previous blog in the series:

Next blog in the series:

Index of blogs in the series:

This blog is an excerpt from "A Twisted History: Genesis and the Cosmos" -

Killing Apophis

In late 2014, we had our first glimpse of an embryonic multiple-star solar system, GG Tauri.

Image: GG Tauri, "The Feeding Twins - Scratch That - Triplets"
Credit: ESO / L. Caçada

The development of GG Tauri is uncannily similar to the picture drawn from the ancient Egyptian Creation Myth. In that account, the primordial god Atum arose alone in the shape of a mound within the watery Nun, that is, as the “central clump” of an “interstellar nebula” consisting of the exploded remains of previous generation stars. Atum develops an “eye” (proto-sun) and spits out the first gods Shu (“gas”) and Tefnut (“moisture”) from his “body” in a act of cosmic masturbation. It has been theorized that proto-stars convulse and eject matter, however it has not been suspected that this might lead to an initial gas-giant planet, such as our planet Saturn.

Atum’s first “eye” was however sickly and drifted away. Atum therefore developed a “sound and beneficial” eye (our large, bright, main-sequence sun). Yet, when the original eye returned it was “angry” and had to be pacified (as the “sun” Jacob placated his wrathful “older twin” Esau).

“It [the first sun] was angry with me [Atum], after it returned and found that I had made another in its place, having replaced it with the Glorious Eye, which I had made. Then I advanced its place on my head, and after it had ruled this entire land, its rage fell away to its roots, for I had replaced what had been taken away from [or with] it.” - James Pritchard, Ancient Near Eastern Texts, p 6.

Atum’s wrathful eye was (or became) a type of red dwarf sun, which are known for their volatility, but also their relatively short life-spans as active suns. Despite being placated (becoming a “failed star”), the peace did not last. The twin sun was eventually declared an “evil enemy” (nemesis) and given the name of Apophis the Serpent. As with the serpent in the Genesis account, it is said of Apophis, “I have commanded that a curse be cast upon him.” The narration of Apophis and his demise is recorded at great length and in gory detail. It was not accomplished by Atum directly, but by the “sending out” of those beings (planets) that Atum had made. It involved a series of planetary collisions in which Apophis is hacked as with a knife, his heart ripped out, and he is consigned to the flames. In the end he can no longer even see and his name is no more in the land. “His bones are not, and his skin is not. He is fallen and overthrown.” James Pritchard, Ancient Near Eastern Texts, p 7.

There are two sides to every story. Although Egypt worshipped Atum-Re and vilified Apophis, just the opposite was the case in the north. In Babylon, the alter-ego of Apophis, Marduk-Bel, was held Supreme. Instead of being an evil force that had to be vanquished, he was hailed as the tragic hero whose sacrificial efforts had brought about the creation of the Earth and human beings.

GG Tauri is a triple-star that shows signs of having started out as a single-star or binary-star system that divided (“fragmented”) due to a combination of size/mass and rate of rotation. The suns are tightly spaced and are presently spinning rapidly within a womb-like outer disk that re-supplies each with the raw materials it needs to continue growing and to conceivably also produce planets. The feeding bands have taken a decidedly serpentine form.

Previous blog in the series:

Next blog in the series:

Index of blogs in the series:

This blog is an excerpt from "A Twisted History: Genesis and the Cosmos" -

Planet X is a Dead Head

Planetary scientists generally agree that Uranus sustained a massive impact during our solar system's formation, which resulted in its extreme (98 degree) tilt of rotation. This is over three times as extreme as any other planet in our solar system. About three years ago, a team of scientists led by Alessandro Morbidelli (at the Cote d'Azur Observatory in Nice, France), announced their conclusion that Uranus had even sustained multiple collisions.

More recently, it has been learned that at least half of star systems in the galaxy are binary/multiple, and within 81 light-years of Earth two-thirds are of that persuasion. This estimate does not include solar systems that were originally binary but separated into single star systems. Our own solar system is evidently in this category! So, the percentages of binary/multiple star systems are likely quite larger than the current conservative estimate.

With that in mind, it is time to reconsider how rocky planets (such as Earth) came about within binary systems. Saturn, called "Mummu" in the Enuma Elish, was the gas giant of our twin's sun. It was "fettered" as by a "nose-rope" from the gravitational action of the larger Jupiter ("Ea") after a "brotherly bounce" by Neptune ("Anu"). Similarly, our planet Uranus was not struck by a rogue planet from outer space, such as Zecharia Sitchin concluded, but by a planet from our own binary star companion. In the Enuma Elish, that planet is called Marduk.

In the Legend of Zu, the planet Marduk is a more complex "god-head" of planets (consisting of Ninurta, Adad and Shara), which resulted in a more complex collision with Uranus ("Zu"). Neither Uranus or Marduk "died" or disappeared/exploded. Instead, these proto-planets were transformed into the inner rocky planets and outer gas planets we know today. Ninurta became Mercury, Adad became Mars, and Shara became Sedna. Uranus lost its inner orbit and around two Earth masses of water and other matter, which became the planets Earth and Venus.

In a binary model, there is no need for a "Planet X" or other unaccounted large mass to explain solar system anomalies. Our sun's twin could have been outright ejected and even captured by a third star system, perhaps the same star system ("Laban") that forced the planets of our original binary system ("Jacob and Esau") to overlap and come into conflict with each other.

No matter how the myths and Biblical accounts "sliced and diced" it, the head-on collision between Uranus and "Marduk" (R.I.P.) was the defining moment in our solar system's formation. It transformed a binary star system with two sets of inert planets into a single solar system with at least one planet (Earth) that was capable of nurturing life. We can't presently say exactly how precise the mythological models were. However, it is safe to assume that the model could NOT have been simply dreamed up by primitive earthlings. It has a distinctly extra-terrestrial spin to it! And it was certainly based on a cursory analysis (at a minimum) of our star system from the vantage point of space.

Related Links:

Complex Chemical Make-Up of the Planets Provides Clues:

Criticism of the "Nice Model" is Based on the Single Star System Assumption:

"Scholz’s star" passed through our Oort Cloud 70K years ago:

Note: Scientists rule out the possibility that this star could be orbitally bound to our sun, but there are certainly other ramifications, such as spawning of comets that ended the last Ice Age, and even the arrival of extra-terrestrial "visitors" associated with the rogue star system. (If you don't have the resources to travel to distant stars, wait for habitable planets to come to you!)

The Hunt for Planet X: New Worlds and the Fate of Pluto:

Uranus and the Babylonian Creation Epic "Enuma Elish":

Zecharia Sitchin Vindicated, Sort Of:

Multiple Collision Needed to Explain the Orbits of the Moons of Uranus?:

Defunct Nemesis Theories



Other Red Dwarfs Recently Discovered in our Solar Neighborhood:

WISE J104915.57-531906

WISE J085510.83-071442.5

Note: A twin sun that separated during the early solar could now be 1000's of light-years away!

Previous blog in the series:

Next blog in the series:

Index of blogs in the series:

This blog is an excerpt from "A Twisted History: Genesis and the Cosmos" -

"On the Shoulders of Giants"

As part of my new study of Genesis, I have learned that the first genealogy of Adam tells the story of how our planet Earth formed within our (originally binary) solar system. I'll blog about that later.

Previous blog in the series:

The second genealogy of Adam provides a very concise list of the major "generations (species)" of hominids that have "walked the Earth."

(1) Adam (“ruddy”)
Australopithecus Anamensis: Ape-Man

(2) Seth (“granted, placed, attired, chaotic”)
Australopithecus Afarensis (“Lucy”): moving recklessly between the trees and ground

(3) Enosh (“a man”)
Australopithecus Africanus: bigger brained, first human-like face

(4) Kenan (“trader”)
Homo Habilis: “handy man," stone tool maker

(5) Mahalalel (“praised”)
Homo Ergaster: speaker, less hairy

(6) Jered (“came down”)
Homo Erectus: descended fully from the trees, less ape-like limb proportions, axe maker, traveler

(7) Enoch (“walked with God and was not”)
Homo Antecessor: ahead of its time, short-lived

(8) Methuseleh, “man of the spear”
Homo Heidelbergensis: wide-ranging hunter-warrior, progenitor of the Neanderthals

(9) Lamech, “evil genius”
Cro-Magnon: “God-Man”

(10) Noah (“faithful, obedient”)
Homo Sapiens Sapiens/Modern Man: “a little lower than the angels”

We are the last race on the list, but will we last? Probably the 12th iteration of hominids will be the charm!

Next blog in the series:

Previous blog in the series:

Index of blogs in the series:

This blog is an excerpt from "A Twisted History: Genesis and the Cosmos" -

Is this how Einstein went to sleep?

What did Einstein do to go sleep? This has been the question the World has always wanted to know the answer to. Here I present the answer.

An Ancient Map of Intelligent Life in the Galaxy (Continued)

This is a continuation of the previous blog. Again, refer to the following chart of the Northern Constellations:

7) “Benjamin is a ravenous wolf, in the morning devouring the prey, and at the even dividing the spoil.” Gen 49:27 (RSV)

Benjamin is the constellation of Hercules, who crushes the head of the serpent Draco and also holds the serpent constellations of Serpens and Ophiuchus. Hercules has a very dim pole star, Tau Hercules. However, Hercules plays the harp of Lyra with its bright pole star Vega. On the opposite side of Hercules is the equally bright pole star Arcturus. In the deep field of Hercules (beyond these "Pillars of Hercules" (Vega and Arcturus) lies the oldest known star cluster (M92) and the brightest star cluster in the northern hemisphere (M13). M92 appears as a type of heavenly “City of Atlantis,” which would have succumbed to devastating “galactic floods" brought on by the supernovae explosions of its first generation stars.

Benjamin is called the "morning devourer" ala the Egyptian Hercules, Horus, who is the deified "Morning Sun" of Egyptian religion.

8) “Dan shall judge his people as one of the tribes of Israel. Dan shall be a serpent in the way, a viper by the path, that bites the horse’s heels so that his rider falls backward.” Gen. 49:16-17 (RSV)

Dan is the constellations of Serpens and Ophiuchus (bordering on Sagittarius the centaur/horse-mounted archer). The “strikes” of Serpens/Ophiuchus cause the “rider” of Sagittarius to fall.

9) “Zebulun shall dwell at the shore of the sea; he shall become a haven for ships, and his border shall be at Sidon.” Gen.49:13
Andromeda (daughter of Cassiopeia), who dwells by the "Heavenly Waters (of Delphinus)," is the lovely Zebulun (Yzebel) "who dwells by the sea." (RSV)

Zebulun/Andromeda probably also incorporated the more modern (and contiguous) constellation of Lacerta (“Lizard”).

10) “Naphtali is a hind let loose, that bears comely fawns.” Gen. 49:21 (RSV)

Naphtali, the “hind let loose" is the constellation of Cassiopeia, "the bound queen that races around the pole." Naphtali "bears beautiful daughters" and Cassiopeia is mother of beautiful Andromeda. Cf Naph and Egyptian Nefer, "Beautiful."

11) “Raiders shall raid Gad, but he shall raid at their heels.” Gen. 49:19 (RSV)

Gad is the constellation of Perseus or Pterseus (“Destroyer”) the son of Proetus, and rescuer of Andromeda. He was clad for battle by the gods with a highly polished (mirror-like) shield, an adamantine sickle, winged sandals, a large satchel, and a helmet of invisibility. The severed head of Medusa itself became his ultimate weapon to overcome his enemies at the end. (Note: In Myth, the fatherhood of Perseus is variously attributed to Proetus or the High God Zeus.)

12) “Asher’s food shall be rich, and he shall yield royal dainties.” Gen. 49:20 (RSV)

Asher whose “bread (is) fat" (KJV) is the constellation of Auriga. Auriga is shaped like a plump loaf of bread and is the mythical source of Capella, the "cornucopia (horn of plenty).”

The “12 tribes of Israel” emerge as constellations that fill up the northern sky (above the galactic plane). The implication is that the northern heavens were (and probably still are) full of intelligent life. Finding such a map in the Book of Genesis is the cosomological equivalent to the Piri Reis map of the Earth’s continents. Both contain knowledge that ancient mankind was not supposed to have possessed. More specifically, the cosmological map provides an explanation for the origins of mysterious domesticated plants and animals, as well as human beings on Planet Earth.

- The first intelligent beings (“space race”) may have been products of the Cygnus (Proetus/Reuben) or Cepheus (Acrisius/Simeon) constellation. However, modern man was evidently created by beings from the constellation fo Bootes (Joseph), the so-called Arcturians. (Note: Arcturus is the brightest star and the pole star of Bootes.) It is quite interesting that the published characteristics of Arcturians (high-minded, inspriring jealousy/hatred, forgiving, dreamers, elongated skulls, geniuses) match the Biblical Joseph typecasting very closely!

Earth is a very wild planet. Much of what can be considered “domesticated” could very well be imported from other places in the galaxy (and with help by alien races from other places in the galaxy)!

Confirmation of this mapping is also found in Ezekiel 48, in which the 12 gates are grouped very much as the corresponding constellations are in the night sky! The prophesy of Ezekiel seems to indicate that "Heavenly Jerusalem" has shifted (or will shift) from a location between "Judah" (Ursa Minor) and Benjamin (Hercules), that is in the constellation of Draco, to a new location, perhaps in Corona Borealis.

“Heavenly/Prophetic Israel” -

Next blog is the series:

Previous blog in the series:

Index of blogs in the series:

This blog is an excerpt from "A Twisted History: Genesis and the Cosmos" -

The Dark Psychology of Trolling and Astroturfing

Evidently, one of the fastest growing career fields is that of the professional blogger (a.k.a troll and astroturfer). From what I can tell, "everybody's doing it."

In the comment section of the article posted below, can you tell the real "deniers" from the paid "trolls"?

One poster lists Bob Marley as a favorite on his Face Book Page, but dislikes "truthers." Are real people actually this conflicted? Sadly, they probably are!

Some other interesting links:
(Again, the comment sections are just as informing as the articles themselves!)

It's also interesting that Psychologists are now researching Internet trolling, but the studies are likely confounded by the presence of so many fake (i.e., paid) trollers/astro-turfers:

I never thought I would actually miss the genuine troll.



( a fictional interview by Der Spiegel? )

Dieter Funk? für Der Spiegel?

Nicht Der Spiegel?

The following is a transcript of an interview I conducted online with Jean-Pierre Fenyo, a self-made, autodidact Philosopher of Ethics who has more recently gained a small but important audience of influential people who somehow began to notice his various comments throughout the Facebook pages of various newspapers and periodicals. His views are just as interesting as the manner in which he expresses them. They tend to be very cautiously phrased, full of qualifiers and, most importantly, based on what appears to be a very good sense of Ethics. All of which is rare to find these days. He is not a Professor of Philosophy and is not formally educated in Philosophy, but he appears to know more about Classical Philosophy than most people. It was his most recent comments concerning Charlie Hebdo and Free Speech that drew my attention.

SPIEGEL: You made an important point in stating that Charlie Hebdo is not an official publication or representation of the views of any government or religious group, and that therefor it is wrong for Muslims anywhere to commit acts of violence against Charlie Hebdo's cartoonists and editors. Would it have been right if it had been an official publication?

Fenyo: Are you asking me if Charlie Hebdo were somehow a government or religious group's official mouth-piece whether or not I think that then violence against that government or religion would be justified?

SPIEGEL: Yes. Precisely.

Fenyo: Even then I think violence is not the way to react to what would then be correctly perceived as a distinct threat made by such a government or religious group. The first correct move would be to demand confirmation, clarification, explanation and an apology. And the next ethical step would be to take legal action, if possible. Severing diplomatic ties and banning business relations might then be the next thing to do. But even if all that would fail to get an apology and fail to get a promise not to make such an offensive threat in the future; violence would be counter-productive. My point was that because Charlie Hebdo isn't even a serious news publication, let alone something expressing the official views of any government or religious group; the terrorist attack against Charlie Hebdo was also an attack against legitimate freedom of expression by private citizens in a relatively Democratic society or country, and cannot be excused. Totally unacceptable. Totally!

SPIEGEL: But what about laws against incitement and hate-speech against people on the basis of their religion, ethnicity, race, or whatever other prejudice? Is Charlie Hebdo not subject to such laws that already exist, and, if so, should they not be prosecuted by the French authorities?

Fenyo: I think that if a private individual person starts blasting his opinion in public with a megaphone, or even merely speaking very loudly in an effort to get attention, and says something that suggests all Muslims, or all Jews, or all Christians, or all whatever, should be willing to be openly offended or risk being deported or imprisoned, or worse, then I think that would clearly be hate-speech and possible incitement. But Charlie Hebdo is not doing that. It mocks all religions and religious personages. And it offends without excluding anyone. It's the difference between someone telling a friend that she or he thinks priests are pedophiles and someone actually going up to a priest and yelling "you are a pedophile" while pointing right at them! It's the difference between someone only publishing offensive cartoons only targeting Jews and someone mocking all persons of all ethnic and / or religious backgrounds or identities. It's the difference between a Muslim preacher distributing copies of The Koran and saying Islam is the only way to salvation, and a fanatic extremist calling for the murder of all non-Muslims! One is merely offensive and unsophisticated and the other is not only offensive but is explicitly hateful and threatening violence.

SPIEGEL: You live here in the United Kingdom…in London…and as I understand it; UK laws would actually not allow a publication like Charlie Hebdo to exist in the first place. The law here supposedly prohibits the publication of anything that is deemed to be offensive to anyone at all. Do you think the UK should allow a UK publisher to publish something similar to Charlie Hebdo?

Fenyo: I think the UK has very valid reasons to be concerned about allowing such a publication to be published here. After all, the UK tries to accommodate to as many faiths and ethnicities and cultures as possible, and has the general attitude that if one has nothing nice to say about others then they might as well say nothing at all. It has its purpose, and is very business-oriented. Keep Calm and Carry On. But it unintentionally has a very dark side: it means that one can easily be silenced in public by practically anyone else making a complaint to the police, claiming that they were offended. And that means that many important exchanges of ideas and many important dialogues that could help prevent extremism never happen! And also that things like Monty Python's Flying Circus cannot be made in today's Britain, and that actual Freedom of Expression and Free Speech do not exist in public spaces! And this also creates a dangerously unfair advantage for the corporate private sector and for the ruling governing political parties. Thus British Democracy exists in a very limited sense. Yet the British pride themselves on being the bedrock of modern European Democracy and Freedom. Quite a contradiction if I may say so.

SPIEGEL: Yet there he was, Prime Minister David Cameron, walking more so than marching, alongside President Hollande, Chancellor Merkel, Prime Minister Netanyahu and President Abbas, President Goodluck of Nigeria and others. Was he not also saying "JeSuisCharlie"?

Fenyo: First of all, I am not British or even a citizen of the UK. I am here on account of being an EU passport holder residing in the UK married to someone who is still healthy enough to be able to work here. So; the question might be better asked of someone native. But let's be realistic; Prime Minister Cameron was not holding a sign or button stating "JeSuisCharlie", and I think we can imagine why he wouldn't have done so if offered one. He was there in a show of solidarity with France as a whole and to sort of tell these terrorists that they cannot win and will be defeated. And on that point I agree with the Prime Minister; even as there are many things with which I will never agree with him on. As for myself, I prefer to say: "JeSuisAntiFasciste"!

SPIEGEL: Many of your comments include expressions of your total opposition and abhorrence of both Theocratic Fascism and Plutocratic Fascism. Obviously you are against Elites ruling over society, but is the threat just as real as that of Violent Fanatics?

Fenyo: Yes. One feeds off the existence and perpetuation of the other! Unethical types of Capitalists, as opposed to Ethical Capitalists, cause great suffering and millions to die prematurely each year by deliberately failing to pay decent wages, provide safe and relatively healthy workplaces and jobs, and by forcing poor and lowered middle class people into substandard, unhealthy, excessively small and yet unreasonably expensive housing units. They actively prevent society and government from finally solving the housing needs of the very people that service them, and now they are trying to find ways to further reduce the need for actual human labor, displacing people and creating more and more poverty. It is totally inhuman, and yet done in such ways as to make it hard to prove directly in any court of law. In fact, poor people no longer can get proper legal representation at all, and their voices are no longer given enough attention by much of the news media! Fanatic extremists and ultra-nationalist fanatics…and think about it: extreme nationalism is itself a religion of sorts…hence ultra-nationalists often work within Theocratic Fascist movements…anyway…Theocratic Fascists would have a very hard time trying to recruit anyone if Plutocracy and the corruption that Plutocracy breeds seized to exist!

SPIEGEL: Are you implying that the UK is a Plutocracy?

Fenyo: No. It is still not yet there. The UK is still somewhat of a Democracy, but it, just like my USA, is at great risk of becoming outright Plutocracies!

SPIEGEL: Do you think Russell Brand is right to call for revolution?

Fenyo: Thank You for bringing up his name. To many he sounds like he's a real People's man, but I think he is very confused about a lot of things. In our times a violent revolution would never work at all, and even any attempt at such would simply be exploited as an excuse for the Elitists Plutocrats to get government to fully silence any and all of us in the name of public national security. In any case Russell Brand proved how confused and senseless he can be when he actually expressed support for Hamas, and joined those who love to bash Israel and unfairly attack Israel for merely having no easy choices when it comes to defending itself, its citizens and its regional security interests….some of which are also our International Security interests. Hamas holds the majority of the people of Gaza hostage in terrible fear and danger. Hamas are no different than ISIS and AQ. Had Russell Brand at least stayed neutral he would have saved face with me. What he should have done is support serious Two States Peace-seekers like One Voice Movement. But he seems to be insensitive about the rights of the real minorities of The Middle East, including the Jews of Israel.

SPIEGEL: Abbas and the Palestinian Authority are now taking Israel to the International Criminal Court in The Hague alleging that Israel committed War Crimes. What is your view on this?

Fenyo: First of all, given how complex this tragic and horrifically violent long-time conflict has been: it serves no good purpose for either side to take matters to the ICC. Hamas and other in Gaza fire lethal rockets indiscriminately threatening, harming, injuring and even killing innocent Israelis…they do so while hiding behind the backs of poor Palestinian men, women and children! Israel has every right to defend itself, but in such a situation there is no realistic way to do so without risking harm or death to those poor Gazans! Most Israelis actually understand this very well, and wish that Hamas would just go away and leave both sides to make real peace possible. It could happen that on the basis of some limited understanding the ICC rules that Israel is guilty. Have there been problematic incidents? Yes. But what about Hamas in the first place?! To think that they would be found innocent and Israel guilty would be a travesty! This is not at all like what happened in Rwanda, in Cambodia, in Nazi-invaded parts of Europe! There is no comparative. The ethical thing would be for the ICC to either go into very precise details, taking decades to do, by which time either peace will become reality or the World will fall into total final chaos! Or for the ICC to dismiss cases by both sides, but issue a stern warning that somehow peace must be achieved and that whoever is then found to be opposing efforts at real peace should risk being indicted! I think that then Israel and the PA would reach some sort of meaningful, viable agreement and peace would finally begin to blossom.

SPIEGEL: You are Jewish. Your grandfather was at the top of Hitler's Most Wanted Dead or Alive list of Hungarian Jews. You have researched The Holocaust, and your father is a Historian who has written about World War Two. Do you think there is any reason to be concerned about rising anti-Semitism in Europe and elsewhere? Is it as serious a threat as it was before WW2?

Fenyo: Nb doubt antisemitism is increasing, but there is also a new phenomena: non-Jews, including relatively moderate Muslims, who actually consciously and openly reject, oppose and condemn anti-Semitism. But the risk of things getting much worse is always there so long as three things are not achieved: One; a viable peace arrangement between Israelis and the people who have long now chosen to be called Palestinians. Two; serious educational efforts to teach young people and adults about Ethics and that Fascism of any kind is a threat to all Humanity, and that Racism, Xenophobia, Antisemitism, and Reactionary Hate are all threats to Democracy and parts of the Fascist narrow mindset that only knows how to destroy lives, and always leads to senseless, horrific death and destruction! And last but not least; that the Islamic nations of the World finally accept the Historical legitimacy of the Jewish people to live in their own safe and respected Israel and elsewhere, based even on what The Koran states. Thus the Arab World needs to admit that it is a false and mistaken narrative that suggests that Jews are foreign European invading colonialists; when in fact Semitic Jews are definitely entitled to live in Israel and elsewhere throughout the Middle East. There is no fundamental reason why Muslims and Jews cannot live together in peace and by doing so begin to prosper together. None. Both sides' extremists are lying about Islam and about Judaism. Peace is not only possible, in spite of all incidents that would seem to suggest otherwise, ….peace is not only possible, but essentially and urgently required for the sake of regional and hence global peace as well. The stakes are too high to allow Extremists, Distorters and Cherry-pickers of Scripture to wreck everything for everybody. We, the Moderates of the World need to cut out the BS and begin to stand strong and united in our diversity against the Extremists Pseudos of the World.

SPEIGEL: When you talk or write like that you begin to sound very rhetorical. Is there not a bit of the Messianic or narcissist in you?

Fenyo: Not at all. I don't think of myself as being superior to anyone in the ultimate sense of what it is to be a Living Being, a Human Being and someone Spiritual and Scientific. I just think the World needs real people as role models, and if I don't volunteer alongside others then who will? After all; a World without Human heroes cannot become a much better, truly Enlightened and Enlightening Wiser World!

SPIEGEL: You first became famous as someone who sat out in New York City's Greenwich Village with a sign that read "Free Advice". And you often point out that you were the first person in modern Western civilisation to be a Philosopher enticing people with such a simple sign. You then state that Rupert Murdoch and his media undermined your further rise to fame, and that you were eventually almost entirely forgotten by the millions of those who had seen you on TV in the last three years of the 1980s. Why would Murdoch do that?

Fenyo: He will probably not remember having met me outside The Stock Exchange on Wall Street sometime in 1987. He will then deny having done so. But I remember otherwise. I think he and others like him see people, Deep and Critical Thinkers like me, as threats to their efforts to dumb-down the majority of society. After all he serves the interests of those who profit off ignorance, conflict and greed. I was then, as I am now, a Philosopher who invites people to think about the Infinite, about the mystery of Existence and Life, about the possibility of a World in which everyone is encouraged to think deeply and be open-minded towards new ideas and thoughts, experiences, emotions and feelings! My purpose has always been to encourage everyone to be Individualistic and yet capable of meaningful, peaceful coexistence, cooperation and creativity! A creative person is more free than someone who is not creative. The World needs more Freedom and Liberty and Rights, not less. Fascism is the enemy of all Humanity. Asimovian Robotonomics, as I call it, in effect Ethical Social-Democracy in which Robots and Computers perform work for all of us and we still get paid an income; that is how we get to The Promised Land! That is how we put a Final End to Slavery! That is how we can Restore Sanity to the World, Save the Biosphere and its many Life-forms and create a New Eden!

SPIEGEL: If I am not mistaken you coined the term Asimovian Robotonomics in memory and respect for Isaac Asimov; with whom you had a direct meeting and exchange of thoughts with. Do you think he would approve of you doing so?

Fenyo: Maybe we will find out when we meet him in the next existence! If we do! All I know is that I don't know all, but I know a little about everything in general and less about anything in specific!

SPIEGEL: Thank You Mr. Fenyo for granting this interview.