Click here to support the Daily Grail for as little as $US1 per month on Patreon

News Briefs 11-12-2014

Last News Briefs of 2014 for me. My, how time flies when you’re having Fort!

Thanks to the whole TDG community for another stellar year. Enjoy the holidays!

Quote of the Day:

“If the fool would persist in his folly, he would become wise.”

~William Blake

    1. My bad
      The reason the article appeared on my weekly news radar, was due to this Boing Boing post. Sometimes I prefer to use original sources, hence why I linked it.

      Given the current affairs transpiring in the US though, that ‘old’ news has just gotten a bit of relevancy, don’t you think? 😉

  1. Oberg’s awkward response when asked about UFOs and the ISS
    Just below this article at HuffPo is a comment, as it should have been expected, from the unofficially-official national UFO-debunker extraordinaire, James Oberg. His first words define the environment he creates: “For at least one supreme reason, that suggestion is silly.”

    Oberg travels the vast, digital spaces, landing when and where needed to offer his, um, specialized views, as if he had been at each and every sighting from Kenneth Arnold to the present. But, seriously… the word ‘unidentified’ pretty much defines the subject as a whole, no?

    Isn’t this within the realm of his Nasaiacal desk’pertise?

    For at least one supreme reason, that suggestion is silly.

    1. Good point
      The question was whether the astronaut had seen “unidentified objects in space.” That’s it. Not if he had seen “extraterrestrial ships in space.” He could have then replied that from time to time, astronauts observe odd objects floating around that could very well have mundane –or in this case, orbital– explanations. You’d think NASA would prep them to expect that kind of questions, given the natural public interest in the subject.

      Or maybe he’s not really that used to give interviews in Spanish.

    1. Gracias
      You know me, I’m still gonna hang around here during the holidays. But now I want to ENJOY the site the way I used to, without the pressure of putting up the news briefs 😉

  2. Objects from Space etc.
    Mi segundo lenguaje es el Espanyol.

    Anyway: the astronaut with the PR flag is not very fluent in Spanish. Apparently his primary language is English; regardless of his parentage. He could not have understood the question in the context of how it was being asked, because the people asking him this question are totally fluent in their primary language and assumed that he would understand the question in the manner intended. Obviously he was under the impression that he was being asked whether or not one can see other objects from the ISS. And he was a bit perplexed why grown-ups would ask him such a question; given that practically everyone knows that one can see celestial bodies from the ISS. I am sure that he would think that he has not seen any extremely anomalous UFOs. NASA’s astronaut training program includes a whole chapter on dealing with the kinds of odd observables that one can see from the ISS; including the fact that ice particles, gas emissions and other things coming from delivery vehicles and the ISS itself can seem to be extraordinary objects when they are not. And due to this training the majority of these astronauts would not even spend any time considering the possibility that maybe there might be anomalous observables that could be other than the official explanation. They just don’t have the time. Their schedules are crammed with things to do.

    1. Bien dicho
      Yeah, I’m willing to concede that he didn’t honestly understand the question. Ethnicity does not imply you’re going to be fully bilingual. And the people asking the questions should’ve tried to make it more clear for him, but… perhaps they didn’t want to embarrass him?

      All the other things you’ve mentioned are also very valid.

  3. Planet of the “Apes”
    When we start treating our animals better, there will be no need for misanthropy. Mine just swelled a little more. C’mon NY your supposed to be more level headed than this. Oh and way to go opening this giant can of worms, hope you don’t mind animal rights activists haunting your ever move.

    They. Are.Coming. For. You…you have been warned…*fades into shadow*

    1. Personhood vs Sentiency
      On the one hand I kinda get it: Animals like apes cannot be considered ‘persons’ the way is understood by the law, because they don’t really form part of our society. BUT maybe we should come up with a different legal term, like ‘sentient being’. Recognizing that these creatures are incredibly complex, and we must look after their cognitive and emotional needs.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mobile menu - fractal