Click here to support the Daily Grail for as little as $US1 per month on Patreon

News Briefs 28-05-2007

A big welcome to new readers. Don’t be shy, post your thoughts.

Quote of the Day:

A poet’s eye, in fine frenzy rolling,
Doth glance from heaven to earth, from earth to heaven;
And as imagination bodies forth
The form of things unknown, the poet’s pen
Turns them to shapes and gives to airy nothing
A local habitation and a name.

Shakespeare, A Midsummer Night’s Dream

  1. Rick MG wrote:
    Linda

    [quote=Rick MG]Linda Moulton Howe is keeping us updated on the drone caught on camera. Even if a fake, I love the wavy wires at the top, very Tesla.[/quote]

    “If a fake”? 😉

    In this day and age, with CGI and Photoshop at the hands of anyone, not to mention the proven track record of the intelligence agencies pushing out bogus data, there shouldn’t even be any discussion of a UFO image until the sighter has been interviewed. If people want to remain anonymous, then the bulls**t meter should be pegging hard right. Move on…

    Kind regards,
    Greg
    ——————————————-
    You monkeys only think you’re running things

    1. Shennanigans
      I call shenanigans too — it was a very subtle if. 😉

      One thing doesn’t add up. The witness said he took photos, then went home to get a better camera. When he returned several hours later, the drone was still there, so he took higher-resolution pictures. Which begs the question — why didn’t he use the digital camera’s film function and capture moving footage? Cos it’s a photoshop fake. The close-up picture of the drone’s under-carriage, clearly showing “alien” script that looks to be modified Japanese kanji, is a little too convenient for my suspicious mind. I’m a believer, but I’m not a sucker.

      It’s a shame this drone story will be discussed for years (gleefully by skeptics), but the Chicago O’Hare UFO will be forgotten before it’s even a year old. People love pretty glossy pictures, but I’ll take compelling eyewitness testimony without pictures any day of the week.

    2. “Drones”
      Ms. Howe posts it as “drone(s)”. The plural would be appropriate: the object is different in every picture. Trying to get it just right, I surmise. It ends up looking like “trying too hard”.

      As for the supporting comments, I am not impressed, especially since there is so much explaining based on so little. I could come up with any number of reasonable and supportable explanations regarding the configuration. Except why it changes from picture to picture.

      No, I don’t think this one will make next year’s top 25 hoaxes. I think it’ll sink with nary a ripple.

      No, I am not the brain specialist…..
      YES. Yes I AM the brain specialist.

  2. bendable thin displays
    Oh well there goes my plan to become filthy rich. I wanted to make portable computers the size of a paperback book, that had fold-out displays the size of a normal laptop display. Now the big companies have beaten me to it.

    Oh well.

    —-
    Life is a sexually transmitted disease with 100% mortality.

    1. Pigosaurus
      I believe the kid shot a pig, but with a pistol?! A smaller pig possibly, but not Pigosaurus. I also question the pig’s actual size. There’s something strange about the forced perspective in the photos. Check out the first pic from the left and compare it to pic 2 (middle). The pig is definitely smaller in the middle pic compared to pic 1. Pic 3 looks like the guys are a couple of metres back from the pig. The bottom pic of the pig being hoisted by the tractor definitely shows a smaller pig. Notice there aren’t any pictures of people standing in front of Pigosaurus? I reckon this is a hoax response to Hogzilla.

      I smell bacon.

      1. Agreed
        I agree with you, although a .50 caliber pistol is a big gun, especially for a 11 year old. The pictures do seem off like you mentioned. If the pig is that size though it would be one heck of a BBQ 😉

        1. .50 caliber and mice
          Strange coincidence, I just remembered a story an old friend told me, about his .44 magnum Derringer. He said firing one of those without heavy gloves is a bad idea. Also he fired at a full size refrigerator, from about 5 yards, and he missed. I pratices with him in a pistol range, and he was pretty decent, so it was not him, it was the gun with no barrell.

          As for the photography, you can get a mouse to appear that large. Maybe we should let these guys have their joke.

          Or perhaps ask them to kill a giant mouse?

          —-
          Life is a sexually transmitted disease with 100% mortality.

      2. Notzilla
        [quote=Rick MG]There’s something strange about the forced perspective in the photos. [/quote]

        I can’t believe the hype this story has got (spots on all major news here in Australia). I admit that the first time I saw the photo my jaw dropped, but then when I looked closely, it’s all forced perspective. When the kid is behind the pig, he’s quite a way back from it, but the photo gives the impression he’s almost leaning on top of it. I’m not denying it’s a big pig – it is – but I’ve seen a domesticated pig of similar size. It’s just the trick perspective which has suckered everyone in.

        And yes, I am incredibly jaded at the moment, with all the hype about nonsense stories, and people ignoring the stories of substance…

        Kind regards,
        Greg
        ——————————————-
        You monkeys only think you’re running things

        1. Randi’s loving it
          [quote=Greg]
          And yes, I am incredibly jaded at the moment, with all the hype about nonsense stories, and people ignoring the stories of substance…
          [/quote]

          Don’t shoot the messenger. 😉 The pig story is just a parody of the mainstream news always ending with a whacky story about someone doing something stupid, or a cute kitten stuck up a chimney. Hence why it’s after the Pravda story.

          It’s also no coincidence that I placed the Heavy Stuff’s piece on the O’Hare UFO after the drone hoax.

          In his secret underground lair, the Amazing Randi is laughing maniacally.

  3. and the rest of the planets?…
    I guess the John Gray fad ain’t dead yet, Venus, Mars, greenmen from moon, martians, venutians, cassiopeians, grey reptilians, monoatomic pixie dusters, etc
    Judy Andreas was piqued at being S.H.I.T listed and sez men come from Uranus, so how many planets are there left that give us attributable sources for folk?

    Are UFO-ET’s Plutoian, Neptunian, Saturnian, Jupiterian in origin? just wonderin’.

    1. Uranus
      Heh, it was just a continuing joke from the “spying on alien women” line above it, and caves on Mars sealed it for me. I’m not a fan of John Gray’s Mars/Venus stuff either. I met him once and said, “you can stick that up Uranus”.

      1. planets or not
        They got Pluto demoted for silly internal political reasons.

        You know who is next.

        —-
        I do not fear computers. I fear the lack of them.
        (Isaac Asimov)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mobile menu - fractal