Click here to support the Daily Grail for as little as $US1 per month on Patreon

Economist on Benefits of a Fake Alien Invasion

Speaking on a CNN panel discussion, American economist Paul Krugman suggests a novel way of boosting the economy: fake an alien invasion.

If we discovered that space aliens were planning to attack, and we needed a massive build-up to counter the space alien threat, and inflation and budget deficits took secondary place to that – this slump would be over in 18 months. And then if we discovered, ‘whoops we made a mistake, there aren’t actually any space aliens’… there was a Twilight Zone episode like this, in which scientists fake an alien threat in order to achieve world peace. Well, this time…we need it to get some fiscal stimulus.

Most Grailers would probably see an echo here of Reagan’s statement in the 1980s that an outside threat from aliens might bring the world together. Readers of our Darklore series would also be aware that there was an earlier fictional telling of this ‘hoaxed alien threat’ plotline: in his article in Darklore Volume 1 (Amazon US and UK), Blair MacKenzie Blake discusses Bernard Newman’s 1948 book The Flying Saucer:

[I]t was possibly the first book to deal with the subject of flying saucers, and…its enigmatic author was almost certainly an intelligence agent whose career remains to this very day shrouded in secrecy and deceit.

…the plot involves a “League of Scientists” who stage a series of flying saucer crashes, in the hope that the world’s leaders will unite against a common foe (i.e. the deliberately created extraterrestrial threat), thus bringing about world disarmament. Newman’s novel contains many elements that will be familiar to Roswell aficionados, and the story often mirrors the labyrinthine intrigue of today’s UFO psy-ops and military disinformation tactics.

Included in the narrative is the contrived crash of a flying saucer in the wastes of New Mexico, complete with a considerably quantity of strange lightweight, though extraordinarily hard metallic debris…

(h/t Boing Boing)

You might also like…

Editor
  1. Krugman’s comment is one of
    Krugman’s comment is one of the weirdest things I have ever heard come out of the mouth of a self styled “liberal.” It demonstrates just how dazed and confused the left has become trying to uphold their image of Obama as a “liberal” when in fact he is a neo-fascist globalist who has subtly warped the left to embrace militarism and social control. We have already had one mocked up alien invasion with martians from the planet Al Queda, and that clearly accomplished no economic miracle for us.
    Is Krugman embracing the idea? Is he mocking it? Hard to say. It just looks like he is floating it without really betraying his true position which is exactly what Obama does. It has become a very bad habit for both parties. They “float” ideas and then sit back to see what the blowback is. It is the “new cowardice.”

  2. Imaginary enemies
    If Krugman thinks a bogus war would help boost the economy, well I’ve got news for him: we already have two of those.

    One is the War on Drugs, and the other is the War on Terror.

    He was once quoted saying 9/11 would be good for the economy, so he knows better than to repeat the same mistake again, hence the ‘safe’ road of invoking imaginary aliens.

    What he forgets is that government spending in itself is not enough. The United States reaped the fruits of their efforts after WWII not because making bigger guns improves the standard of living, but because many inventions and discoveries made by scientists during the war had indirect applications during peace time —the invention of radar gave us microwave ovens.

    But that has not been the case with the last wars America has embarked in the last two decades; possibly because the Military has not been willing to share many of their patents and discoveries with the rest of the world.

  3. bring the world together?
    Others have already made good points about the fact that bogus wars aren’t actually good for economies and, if you’re a bit of a libertarian like me, you’d tend to believe that no war is really good for any economy.

    What I think is bizarre is the idea that an alien invasion would somehow unite humanity. Popular media and disaster movies(like Independence Day or 2012) often portray it as being a given that humanity would come together in the face of an existential threat. However, I would argue that this might be a touch naive. Perhaps George R. R. Martin’s “Song of Ice and Fire” paints a better picture of how humanity would act in the face of an external crisis.

    For those who haven’t yet read (or watched) A Game of Thrones (or further), the setting is a medieval era high fantasy where most of the characters haven’t actually encountered anything “magical” before. All the leaders of this world are more or less informed that there is an external threat coming from north of “The Wall”, but they generally choose to ignore it and continue their squabbles over the throne in the south.

    Another pretty good analogy to this: global warming. Yes, there’s some debate about how much is caused by human activity and there’s debate about how much of a threat it really is to human life. However, the existence af that debate is the point, assuming that global warming is as real and credible of a threat as it is presented, it has done little to unite humanity under a single banner. If anything, different countries and peoples living in those countries have wildly divergent views (and access to information regarding) on the threat global warming/climate change presents.

    Alien invasion bring the world together? Maybe – for a short time – like World War II did, but just like that war, different governments and individuals will attempt to use it to their gain and the world will continue to be fractious even if it fights “together” against an outside “other”.

    1. Global warming

      Another pretty good analogy to this: global warming. Yes, there’s some debate about how much is caused by human activity and there’s debate about how much of a threat it really is to human life. However, the existence af that debate is the point, assuming that global warming is as real and credible of a threat as it is presented, it has done little to unite humanity under a single banner. If anything, different countries and peoples living in those countries have wildly divergent views (and access to information regarding) on the threat global warming/climate change presents.

      +1

      1. Somewhere in the TDG archives
        Somewhere in the TDG archives from some years back there was a good article on a fringe group highly placed in government who were fundie Christians having wet dreams about fascistically mobilizing the country again “satanic” alien invaders.

        Could perhaps the management here unearth that story and run it again? I haven’t been able to find it.

          1. Thank you. That was it. It
            Thank you. That was it. It explains the mentality behind the enthusiasm for a faked alien invasion. Mainly, a staged invasion would make the military industrail complex even more big mountains of money. There is your rationale right there. It is horribly simple.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mobile menu - fractal